Spaces between Control and Care: Field Hospitals during the Covid-19 Crisis in Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research examines and questions the role and importance of the field hospitals during the Covid-19 crisis in Thailand, which, after a successful pilot during an outbreak in Samut Sakhon province, became a model throughout the country. It does so through the perspective of an anthropology of space and the concept of care and uses methods of official document analysis alongside ethnographic fieldwork.
The paper finds that the Thai government considered Covid-19 a national security threat, requiring the proclamation of a state of emergency. The field hospital operates under this emergency with a two-fold objective: 1) to control and stop the spreading of the virus; 2) to care for infected patients. The patient becomes a sick body, subject to control and surveillance, under the continual gaze of healthcare workers. However, this panoptically designed space is subject to change. Through practices of care and personal requests, the field hospital gradually became bearable for migrants. But then, as cases skyrocketed, the balance between control and care burst. As field hospitals reached capacity, Thai citizens received preferential treatment, and migrants were sent back. This crisis raises the question of “whose lives can live long?”
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
References
Agamben G. (2005). State of Exception. University of Chicago Press; 1st edition.
Andrejevic, M., & Volcic, Z. (2021). Pandemic lessons: total surveillance and the post-trust society. The Political Economy of Communication, 9(1), 4-21.
Department of Medical Service. (2021). Guideline for Field hospital preparartion in case of Covid-19 infection. Retrieved from http://covid19.dms.go.th: https://ddc.moph.go.th/viralpneumonia /file/g_health_care/g06.pdf (In Thai)
Dr. Aim, BBC Thai. (2021). Covid-19: Experience the medical team to care of migrant workers at Field Hospital, Samut Sakhon. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/thai/thailand-55643096 (In Thai)
Fassin, D. (2009)., as cited in Foucault, (1979). Another politics of life is possible. Theory, Culture&Society, 26(5), https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0263276409106349.
Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics : an advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
Mol, A., & Hardon, A. (2021). Caring. In J. R. Bowen, N. Dodier, J. W. Duyvendak, & A. Hardon, Pramatic inquiry critical concepts for social sciences, Oxon: Routledge (pp. 185-204).
Rabinow, P. (1996). Artificiality and enlightenment: from sociobiology to biosociality. Politix, 90(2), 21-46.
The Thai government gazette. (2020) Declaration of state of emergency in the kingdom of Thailand, 137(69) D, Retrieved 1Novermber, 2021 https://www.nsc.go.th/wp-content/uploads/ 2020/05/CV19-02.pdf
Ticktin, M. (2006). Where ethics and politics meet: the violence of humanitarianism in france. American Ethnologist, 33(1), 33-49.
World Health Organization. (2003). WHO-PAHO Guidelines for the Use of Foreign Field Hospitals in the Aftermath of Sudden-Impact Disasters. Retrieved from WHO.int: https://www.who.int/hac/ techguidance/pht/FieldHospitalsFolleto.pdf
Wun'Geao, S. et al. (2007). Sociology of Tsunami: Disaster Preparedness and Management, Bangkok: Duentula (pp.1-421).