Protecting farmlands amid urban and industrial expansion: Community mechanisms in Yothaka and Khao Din under Thailand’s EEC development
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study analyzed the community mechanisms used to manage agricultural areas amid urban expansion and the conditions that support their success, focusing on the Yothaka and Khao Din communities in Chachoengsao province. This study adopted a qualitative research approach to understand social phenomena in all relevant contextual dimensions, using a holistic perspective to examine the economic, social, and political dimensions of the study areas, following the framework of local community studies in political economy. Data collection included documentary research (primary and secondary sources), in-depth interviews with key informants in urban development and local governance, and focus group interviews. The study found that both communities developed civil society mechanisms to form social movements. Yothaka formed the “Yothaka Rak Thin Group” to strengthen networks with non-governmental organizations and enhance its bargaining power through petitions, symbolic actions, and negotiations, while Khao Din mobilized through the “Rak Mae Phra Thoranee Network” and utilized specific mechanisms such as rejecting public hearings, seeking redress through the Land Bank Administration Institute, and leveraging national political mechanisms. Key conditions for successful agricultural land management include internal community cooperation, the nature of conflicts, social network building, effective communication, and post-election political context. This study contributes to the reconceptualization of rural civil society in Thailand as shifting from adaptive cooperation to networked, activist resistance under state-led capitalist development.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All rights reserved. Apart from citations for the purposes of research, private study, or criticism and review,no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any other form without prior written permission by the publisher.
References
Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 2003)
Ariyaviriyanant, V. (2009). Development of land reform in Thailand: A case study on the passing of land reform law (B.E. 2475–B.E. 2518) [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. Chula DigiVerse. https://digiverse.chula.ac.th/Info/item/dc:51119 [in Thai]
Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning, Ministry of Interior. (2019, August 5). Draft plan for the Eastern Economic Corridor: Land use plan, infrastructure development plan, and utility systems plan [Meeting document]. The 8th meeting of the Eastern Economic Corridor Policy Committee (EECPC), Bangkok, Thailand. [in Thai]
Eastern Economic Corridor Policy Committee Office, & Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning. (2020). Regulations and enforcement measures for the development plan of the Eastern Economic Corridor: Land use plan, infrastructure development plan, and utility systems plan. https://www.fti-rayong.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/576213120360644825_ข้อกำหนด-มาตรการ-การบังคับใช้แผนผังการพัฒนา-3.pdf [in Thai]
Eastern Friends Network, & Agenda to Change the East. (2019). Submission of a petition by stakeholders regarding the land use plan in the Eastern Economic Corridor [Open letter]. Document submitted to the Secretary-General of the Eastern Economic Corridor Policy Committee. [in Thai]
Eastern People’s Strategy Forum. (2020, September 27). Strategic promotion project for sustainable development and community well-being in the Eastern Economic Corridor [Meeting document]. The Eastern People’s Strategy Meeting, Chonburi, Thailand. [in Thai]
Ecological Alert and Recovery – Thailand (EARTH). (2019, July 23). Yothaka villagers storm Bangkok, proposing a subcommittee to scrutinize the EEC city plan draft. https://earththailand.org/th/article/6342 [in Thai]
Kamchamnarn, P. (2018, August 11). 4 years of fighting: Life in Yothaka and its unpredictable future. Nisitjournal. https://nisitjournal.press/2018/08/11/4-years-of-fighting-life-in-yothaka-and-its-unpredictable-future/
Krueanuan, C., & Sanitwong na Ayutthaya, P. (2021). Political economy of development: A case study the development of the eastern special development zone. Faculty of Political Science and Law, Burapha University. https://buuir.buu.ac.th/handle/1234567890/4445 [in Thai]
Kuaycharoen, P., Laokuemhung, S., Wadjung, C., & Pongkao, W. (2021). Economic valuation of ecosystem services at the Bang Pakong River estuary: A case study of rice farming in natural water fields in Khao Din subdistrict, Bang Pakong district, Chachoengsao province. Thai Health Promotion Foundation (ThaiHealth) & Assembly of Private Organizations for Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Conservation. [in Thai]
Land Bank Management Institute (Public Organization). (2020, May 4). LBAI fulfills its commitment: Preparing to purchase land in Chachoengsao on May 5. https://www.labai.or.th/บจธ-ทำตามสัญญา-เตรียมจั/ [in Thai]
Land Bank Management Institute (Public Organization). (2024). Prayong Doklamyai: Honorary board member. https://www.labai.or.th/นายประยงค์-ดอกลำใย/ [in Thai]
Mansap, S. (2014). Eastern people’s network: “People politics” in Thai society [Doctoral dissertation, Thammasat University]. TU Digital Collections. https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:105331 [in Thai]
Matichon Online. (2019, May 18). Cheers! Khao Din villagers in Bang Pakong begin building homes in “Blue Tech City”. https://www.matichon.co.th/region/news_1500459 [in Thai]
Matichon Weekly. (2018, September 19). Yothaka farmers raise banners against the EEC, declaring they will die here—no relocation, no eviction! https://www.matichonweekly.com/hot-news/article_134592 [in Thai]
Nartsupha, C. (1986). Home and city. Village Institution Promotion Project and the Center for Cultural Development and Creative Isan Villages. [in Thai]
Patradhamkul, W. (2022). Dynamic of protest: A case study of the Anti-Eastern Economic Corridor movement [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. Chula Digital Collections. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/chulaetd/6166/ [in Thai]
Phothisita, C. (2011). The art and science of qualitative research (5th ed.). Amarin Printing and Publishing. [in Thai]
Pinprateep, P. (2020, August 30). Public report by Senator Poldej (No. 20): The case of Khao Din community and the impact of the EEC project 2019. Civil Society Development Institute – CSDI. https://www.csdi.or.th/2020/08/public-report-20/ [in Thai]
PPTV Online. (2018, September 16). Residents of Khao Din reject explanations of the “Chachoengsao BlueTech City” project. PPTV HD 36. https://www.pptvhd36.com/news/ประเด็นร้อน/89371 [in Thai]
Praditsilp, C., Krueanuan, C., & Sombatrattananan, J. (2021). The use of state power in land system organization of the Eastern Economic Corridor. Office of the National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy Council (NXPO), & National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT). [in Thai]
Sampantharak, T. (2021, February 3–7). Effects of urban sprawl on suburban-agricultural area: A case study of Bang-rak Noi agricultural community, Nonthaburi province [Paper presentation]. The 41st Kasetsart University Annual Conference: Engineering and Architecture, Bangkok, Thailand. [in Thai]
Secretariat of the House of Representatives. (2024, March 27). The seventh vice-chairman of the committee on land, natural resources, and environment received a petition from representatives of the Yothaka Rak Thin group to request a study on solutions for treasury land under the Royal Thai Navy’s jurisdiction in Yothaka subdistrict, Bang Nam Priao district, Chachoengsao province. https://web.parliament.go.th/view/1/รายละเอียดข่าว/ภาพข่าวสภาผู้แทนราษฎร/1404/TH-TH [in Thai]
Seemung, J. (2019). Eastern Thailand and its role of innovative industrial center and Greater Mekong Subregion hub: The reviews of Thai state’s proposal on development. Graduate Development Journal, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, 6(2), 57–83.
Strategic and Information Group, Chachoengsao Provincial Agricultural Office. (2022). Rice farming in natural water fields in Chachoengsao province: Local wisdom in sustainable agriculture. Department of Agricultural Extension, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. https://www.doae.go.th/doae_media/การทำนาขาวัง-ภูมิปัญญาท/ [in Thai]
Thai PBS. (2019, July 31). “Pita” visits the EEC area to address the “first button” issue of agricultural land. https://www.thaipbs.or.th/news/content/282224 [in Thai]
Thai PBS. (2020, February 28). Urban zoning changes under the EEC: The intersection of capital and politics. https://www.thaipbs.or.th/news/content/289369 [in Thai]
Thansettakij. (2019, April 10). Urban planning set to approve ‘BlueTech City’ industrial estate for investment exceeding 100 billion baht. https://www.thansettakij.com/economy/398778 [in Thai]
torzkrub. (2020, June 1). “Big Awb” accelerates assistance to farmers, emphasizing sufficient and dignified livelihoods, not just farmland. Kaset Kao Klai. https://www.kasetkaoklai.com/home/2020/06/บิ๊กอวบ-ชี้-ให้มีกิน-มีใ/ [in Thai]
Transborder News. (2018, September 12). Bang Pakong farmers angered by evictions—Investors buying up land to build battery industrial estates for the EEC: Petition to provincial governor planned; green zoning violated by state agencies. https://transbordernews.in.th/home/?p=19414 [in Thai]
Workpoint TODAY. (2019, July 31). “Pita” proposes that the EEC must also protect local agricultural land. https://workpointtoday.com/fwp-2/ [in Thai]