Transnational Human Trafficking Routes: Government Process to Prevent and Resolve Human Trafficking Problems in International Risk Areas

Main Article Content

อัจฉรา ชลายนนาวิน

Abstract

          This article aims to study human trafficking routes in risky areas at the international level and to explore preventive and problem-solving mechanisms to dealing with human trafficking. The study recruited the participants from organizations involved in the rescue for victims of international human trafficking. The researcher employed group discussion and in-depth interviews regarding this topic with 25 participants.


       The results showed that human trafficking routes at the international level started from victim selection. The offenders usually lure the victims who have financial problems. Furthermore, it was found that Thailand is the center for the transition of labor trafficking from neighboring countries which have lower social and economic status. The international criminal organization transferred forced prostitutes to designated countries. The labors from the neighboring countries are the most vulnerable group to human trafficking, especially forced prostitution. Therefore, the state should emphasize on the reinforcement for the susceptible groups by creating the training curriculum for labors and improving the rigidity of immigration law enforcement, or creating the network for proactive encounter in order to enhance interagency integration to cope with the problems concretely.

Article Details

How to Cite
ชลายนนาวิน อ. (2019). Transnational Human Trafficking Routes: Government Process to Prevent and Resolve Human Trafficking Problems in International Risk Areas. Journal of Criminology and Forensic Science, 5(2), 135–149. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/forensic/article/view/194869
Section
Research Articles

References

1.Berger, S.M. (2012). No End In Sight: Why The End Demand Movement Is The Wrong Focus For Efforts To Eliminate Human Trafficking. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 35: 524 – 570.

2.David, F. ( 2005). Human Trafficking. New York: Raven Press.
Friedman, M., & R. Friedman. (1980). Free to Choose. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

3.Genicot, G. (2002). Bonded Labor and Serfdom: A Paradox of Voluntary Choice. Journal of Development Economics. 67(1): 101-127.

4.Global Slavery Index. (2019). Human Trafficking and Modern Slavery. Retrieved 15 January 2019. from https://www.ipoint-systems.com/blog/human-trafficking-and-modern-slavery.

5.International Labour Organization: ILO. (2014). Forced Labour modern slavery and human trafficking. Retrieved 27 November 2018. from https://www.ilo.org/global/ topics/forced-labour/lang--en/index.htm.

6.International Labour Organization: ILO. (2017). Children in Hazardous Work. Retrieved 20 January 2019 from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/@publ/documents/publication/wcms_155428.pdf

7.International Affair Forum. (2017). Interview with Dr. Luke S. Bearup: Human Trafficking Retrieved 23 January 2019 from https://www.ia-forum.org/Content/ViewInternalDocument.cfm?ContentID=8625.

8.Louise, S. (2010). Human Trafficked Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9. Parliament of the United Kingdom. (2003). Sexual Offences Act 2003. Retrieved 20 June 2019. from https://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/police/operationalpolicing/guidance-part-2-sexual-offences?view=Binary.

10. The Minnesota Department of Health: MDH. (2016). Sex Trafficking and Prostitution. Retrieved 20 June 2019.from https://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/uploads/sextrafficking_and_prostitution_10_15.pdf.

11.UNIAP. (2012). Human Trafficking 101. Geneva: UNIAP.

12.Walby, S. et.al. (2016). Study on the Gender Dimension of Trafficking in Human Being. Luxembourge: Publications Office of the European Union.

13.World Health Organization: WHO. (2018). Human Trafficking. Retrieved 20 June 2019. from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/77394/WHO_RHR_12.42_eng.pdf;jsessionid=EAD07292DFEE9FF75DFDD73D73F078B8?sequence=1.