Recommendation for Curriculum Innovation in Closed System Teacher Preparation of Teacher Education Institute under Kru Rak Tin Project for Small Schools in Remote Areas
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to propose recommendations for developing the innovation of the core curriculum for the Teacher Education Institute in remote areas of teacher preparation and development institutions. This study is qualitative research, consisting of in-depth data analysis through documentary analysis of theoretical frameworks, prior studies, and data study through in-depth interviews to obtain insightful information from key informants. The research participants in this study were a total of 11 people, divided into two groups: 1) three experts in teacher education; and 2) eight lecturers from Teacher Education Institute. Research instruments included data collection forms to gather information on core curriculum documents for teacher production of teacher training and development institutions, the “Kru Rak Tin” project, and documents related to the teacher preparation curriculum. The research also involved in-depth interview protocols concerning the development of a closed-teacher preparation curriculum system for remote schools. Data analysis involved examining documents to identify key issues and information about guidelines for curriculum development and content analysis, performing inductive content analysis, and comparing data from interviews to conclude the development of a closed-teacher preparation curriculum system for small schools in remote areas.
The research findings suggest that the proposed innovative curriculum for preparing teachers in the closed system of the Kru Rak Tin project at teacher training institutes for small schools in remote areas should be based on the philosophies of developmentalism and reformism in curriculum development. These philosophical foundations would guide the development of teacher competencies, particularly for community development-oriented educators. In terms of the curriculum’s major subject areas, it should address fields where there is a shortage, particularly in early childhood education and primary education. Regarding student learning outcomes, the curriculum should emphasize learning approaches based on real-life contexts. For student recruitment, the focus should be on recruiting candidates from within local communities, utilizing assessment methods that are appropriate for this context. In terms of curriculum management, it is essential to establish a framework for the design, development, and administration of the teacher training curriculum that allows flexibility to adapt to changing social contexts and situations. Moreover, collaboration with local stakeholders, including school administrators, teachers, and community members is crucial for ensuring active participation in curriculum development, management, and evaluation. In the broader context of closed-system teacher development, relevant agencies involved in teacher production and development should establish and implement a policy and operational framework for closed-system teacher production. The curriculum design should be closely linked to the local context, without excessive control by state authorities. Additionally, it is recommended that the government revise the structural policies or approach to teacher preparation and development to align with the evolving needs of teacher training, as well as the demands of students. There should also be continued growth of the closed system teacher production.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Aiemphaya, K. (2018). Professional development for teachers. Nonthaburi: 21 Century Co., Ltd. [In Thai]
Brameld, T. (1950). Patterns of educational philosophy: A democratic interpretation. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/patternsofeducat0000bram
Brameld, T. (1971). Education as power. Retrieved from http://125.22.75.155:8080/handle/123456789/11374
Carter, L. & Jenson, M. (2022). The role of community-based learning in transformative education: Moving beyond traditional curriculum. Journal of Transformative Education, 20(2), 142-160. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344622110819
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560. (2017). (2017, April 6). Royal Thai Government Gazette, Vol. 134, Sect 40(a). pp. 1-90. [In Thai]
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Retrieved from https://www.schoolofeducators.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/EXPERIENCE-EDUCATION-JOHN-DEWEY.pdf
Field, A. & Hole, G. (2020). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (5th ed.). CA: SAGE Publications.
Herrington, J. & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48.
Higher Education Act, B.E. 2562 (2019). (2019, May 1). Royal Thai Government Gazette, Vol. 136, Sect 57(a). pp. 54-78. [In Thai]
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. CA: Sage Publications.
Nastasi, B. K. & Schensul, J. J. (2005). Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research. Journal of School Psychology, 43(3), 177-195.
Noddings, N. (2013). Philosophy of education. (3rd ed.). CO: Westview Press.
Office of the Education Council. (2007). Report on the evaluation of opportunities and quality of education of Thai people. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [In Thai]
Office of the Education Council. (2015). Thailand's educational competence on the international stage, 2015 (IMD2015). Bangkok: Office of the Education Council. [In Thai]
Office of the Education Council. (2017). National Education Plan 2017-2036. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council. [In Thai]
Office of the Education Council. (2018). State of Thai education 2016/2017: Guidelines for reforming Thai education towards Thailand 4.0. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council. [In Thai]
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2018). 20-Year National Strategy (2018-2037). Bangkok: Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. [In Thai]
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (2nd ed.). CA: Sage: Newbury Park.
Petchchuay, S. (2015). The future of teacher production in Thai higher education institutions. Faculty of Education, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [In Thai]
Petchchuay, S., Phonsaram, P., & Pithiyanuwat, S. (2017). Best practices of teacher production projects in Thai higher education institutions. Dusit Thani College Journal, 11(1), 308-320. [In Thai]
Pithiyanuwat, S. (2012). Documentary research report: Teacher professional license. Bangkok: Office of the National Education Commission, Prime Minister's Office. [In Thai]
Rajabhat University Act, B.E. 2547. (2004). (2004, June 14). Royal Thai Government Gazette, Vol. 121, Special part 23(a). pp. 1-25. [In Thai]
Sanansiang, A. (2021). The development guidelines the competency of measurement and authentic assessment by using professional learning community for teachers in elementary schools under Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Primary Educational Service Area Offices 1 and 2. ARU Research Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(3), 103 – 110. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rdi-aru/article/view/253938
Sasiwuttiwat, S. (2016). Proposal for creating and selecting new generation teachers to enhance the quality of education: A series of reports on teacher personnel reform. Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute.
Secretariat Office of the Teachers Council of Thailand. (2017). Southeast Asia teachers competency framework. Bangkok: Secretariat Office of the Teachers Council of Thailand. [In Thai]
Siribanpitak, P. (2018). Development of mechanisms driving the production and development of high competency teachers for Thailand 4.0. Bangkok: Pepper Graphic Company Limited.
Tangjuang, P. (2011). A model for developing the competence of educational personnel. Bangkok: Duang Kamol Publishing. [In Thai]
Tangkitvanich, S. (2018). Research report on the development of digital manpower to support target industries (S-Curve) and the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute. [In Thai]
The Equitable Education Fund (EEF). (2019). EEF Annual Report 2019. Bangkok: The Equitable Education Fund. [In Thai]
The Equitable Education Fund (EEF). (2023). EEF Annual Report 2023. Bangkok: The Equitable Education Fund. [In Thai]
Veepion, S., Sauphayana, S., & Ployduangrat, J. (2023). Guidelines for school administration as learning community (SLC). The Journal of Research and Academics, 6(6), 301–316. [In Thai]
Wongkum, T., Konpuang, A., Chaowchai, S., & Prajanban, P. (2023). Essential competencies of student teachers in the closed-system teacher production project. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 25(2), 341-351. [In Thai]
Wongkum, T., Konpuang, A., Chaowchai, S., & Prajanban, P. (2024). Competency development model for teachers in the closed-system teacher production project. Journal of Education and Innovation, 26(1), 163-176. [In Thai]
Yingyaw, P., Sujjitjool, W., Thadatantichoke, T., Pumdeeying, N., & Jongchalermchai, P. (2020). Research report on the development of mechanisms and systems for screening professional teachers according to the professional standards of the Teachers Council of Thailand. Bangkok: Secretariat Office of the Teachers Council of Thailand. [In Thai]