สภาพแวดล้อมทางกายภาพในเส้นทางศึกษาธรรมชาติกับการรับรู้และประสบการณ์เรียนรู้ของ ผู้มาเยือนอุทยานแห่งชาติ THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT IN NATURE TRAILS AND PERCEPTION AND LEARNING EXPERIENCE OF NATIONAL PARK VISITORS

Main Article Content

ชวาพร ศักดิ์ศรี Chawaporn Suksri
นภวรรณ ฐานะกาญจน์ พงษ์เขียว Noppawan Tanakanjana Phongkhieo

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to study the physical environment of nature trails in national parks and to study the relationship between environmental perception and learning experience of trails users. The data were collected by surveying the physical environment of nature trails and using a set of questionnaires on 500 trail users.  The site survey data was analyzed by using qualitative analysis method and the questionnaire data was analyzed by descriptive analysis, factor analysis, multiple regression analysis and correlation analysis.  The study results showed that the physical environment and characteristics of trail users positively influencing environmental perception were as follows: 1) landscape features 2) naturalness 3) distance 4) motivation to learn new things 5) attention and 6) prior knowledge about nature and environment. The standardized regression coefficient value (beta) were 0.170, 0.106, 0.101, 0.200, 0.099, 0.089 respectively. Moreover, the environmental perception was positively related to the learning experience in all aspects.  The study recommended that the management of the nature trails’ environment should focus on all environmental perception influential factors mentioned above.  The trail management should encourage users to perceive and learn about the unique landscape features of the trails, content, interpretive methods, or trail components should be designed to promote interest and create effective learning motivation.  All of the above, nature trails' environmental management will enhance the trail users' environmental perception and, thus, lead to their learning experience enhancement

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chawaporn Suksri ช. ศ., & Noppawan Tanakanjana Phongkhieoน. ฐ. พ. (2020). สภาพแวดล้อมทางกายภาพในเส้นทางศึกษาธรรมชาติกับการรับรู้และประสบการณ์เรียนรู้ของ ผู้มาเยือนอุทยานแห่งชาติ THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT IN NATURE TRAILS AND PERCEPTION AND LEARNING EXPERIENCE OF NATIONAL PARK VISITORS. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 16(2), 20-41. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JEM/article/view/240261
Section
บทความวิจัย Research

References

Bell, P. A., Green, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental Psychology. 5th ed. Orlando: Harcourt College Publishers.
Bell, S. (1997). Design for Outdoor Recreation. London: E & FN Spon,
Berchez, F., Carvalhal, F., & Robim, M. D. J. (2005). Underwater interpretative trail: guidance to improve education and decrease ecological damage. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 4(2): 128-139.
Brody, M. (2005). Learning in nature. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 603-621.
Cole, D. N., & Hall, T. E. (2009). Perceived effects of setting attributes on visitor experiences in wilderness: variation with situational context and visitor characteristics. Environmental Management, 44(1), 24.
Crawford, D. (2004). The Aesthetics of Nature and The Environment. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
D’ Antonio, A., Monz, C., Newman, P., Lawson, S., & Taff, D. (2012). The effects of local ecological knowledge, minimum-impact knowledge, and prior experience on visitor perceptions of the ecological impacts of backcountry recreation. Environmental Management, 50(4), 542-554.
Dorwart, C. E., Moore, R. L., & Leung, Y. F. (2009). Visitors' perceptions of a trail environment and effects on experiences: A model for nature-based recreation experiences. Leisure Sciences,
32(1), 33-54.
Emmons, K. M. (1997). Perceptions of the environment while exploring the outdoors: a case study in Belize. Environmental Education Research, 3(3), 327-344.
Emphandhu, D., Wannalert, S., & Ruschano, R. (2004). Guide to The Classification of Ecotourism Zoning by Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) [In Thai]. Bangkok: Tourism Authority of Thailand.
Gundersen, V., & Vistad, O. I. (2016). Public Opinions and use of various types of recreational infrastructure in boreal forest settings. Forests, 7(6), 113.
Heimlich, J. E. (1993). Nonformal environmental education: toward a working definition. The Environmental Outlook. ERIC/CSMEE Informational Bulletin, 2-9.
Herzog, T. R. (1984). A cognitive analysis of preference for field‐and‐forest environments. Landscape Research, 9(1), 10-16.
Horayangkura, V., Settaworakit, B., & Klinmalai, S. (2011). Environmental Psychology: A Basis for Creation
and Management of Livable Environment [In Thai]. Bangkok: G.B.P Center.
Hughes, M., & Saunders, A. M. (2002). Impact of trail-side interpretive signs on visitor knowledge. Journal of Ecotourism, 1, 122-132
Jarupakorn, A., & Lertvicha, P. (2008). Brain Learning Knowing [In Thai]. Bangkok: Institute for gifted and innovative learning (GIL).
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1982). Cognition and Environment: Functioning in An Uncertain Word. New York: Praeger publishers.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaymaz, I.C. (2012). Landscape Perception. In M. Ozyavuz, eds. Landscape Planning. InTech. Retrieved January 26, 2016 from http://www.intechopen.com/books/landscapeplanning/landscapeperception.
Kearney, A. R., Bradley, G. A., Petrich, C. H., Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Simpson-Colebank, D. (2008). Public perception as support for scenic quality regulation in a nationally treasured landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(2), 117-128.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental education research, 8(3), 239-260.
Kalkan, S., & Demirbas, E. (2017). An empirical assessment on environmental awareness of school managers and teachers as stakeholder of private schools. Research Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 310-325.
Lakanawarakul, R. (2011). Guidline of preparation nature trail [In Thai]. Bangkok: National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department.
Meechart, W. (2008). Public Organization Management Behavior. 2nd ed. Bankok: Chulalongkorn university press.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGrawHill.
Ode, A., Fry G., Tveit, M. S., Messager, P., & Miller, D. (2009). Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1), 375-383.
Oku, H., & Katsue, F. (2006). The differences in scenic perception of forest visitors through their attributes and recreational activity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 34-42.
Simonic, T. (2003). Preference and perceived naturalness in visual perception of naturalistic landscapes. Journal of Biotechnology, 81(2), 369-387.
Srisawat, l. (2015). Cognition [In Thai]. Bangkok: Odeon store publisher.
Taweerat, P. (1997). Research in Behavioral and Social Sciences [In Thai]. 7th ed. Bangkok: Educational and psychological test bureau, Srinakharinwirot university prasarnmit.
Tuntates, U. (2011). A Study on Landscape Perception of Visitors to Doi Suthep-Pui National Park [In Thai]. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Kasetsart University.
Turner, R. C., & Carlson, L. (2003). Index of Item-Objective Congruence for Multiple Objective Measure. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 163-171.
Vanichbuncha, K., & Vanichbuncha, T. (2016). Using SPSS for Windows to Analyze Data [In Thai]. Bangkok: Threelada Publisher.
Vandenberg, A. E., & Koole, S. L. (2006). New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4), 362-372.