Research and Development of the Academic Reinforcement to Enhance Procedures of Teacher Education Within the Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Universities Using the Concept of Contemplative Education, Coaching and Mentoring System, and Research-based Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to: 1) develop guidelines for academic reinforcement to enhance procedures to improve teacher education within the Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Universities using the concept of contemplative education, coaching and mentoring system, and research-based learning, 2) synthesize factors for the academic reinforcement, and 3) study the establishment of cooperation network for teacher education improvement within the Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Universities. Research participants consisted of teaching professors, student teachers, and mentor teachers in internship schools of 38 Rajabhat Universities. Research instruments were as follows: an analytical form for operating conditions of teacher education, a data form for knowledge sharing, and reflections from members of the research team. Data were analyzed using the method of content analysis. Research results were as follows: 1) guideline for academic reinforcement to enhance procedures to improve teacher education consisted of objectives, concept and theories, principles, procedures, and output, outcome, and impact of academic reinforcement, 2) success factors for academic reinforcement consisted of the following: knowledge of research team, methods used for academic reinforcement, and operating system and mechanisms for cooperation network, and 3) the cooperation networks among 38 Rajabhat Universities could be regarded as a ring network
Article Details
The Editorial Board claims a right to review and correct all articles submitted for publishing
References
Carter, B. 2012. Facilitating preservice teacher induction through learning in partnership. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 37(2): 99-113.
Chookamnerd, W. and E. Sungtong. 2014. Professional learning community of in school for teacher professional development based on learner centered approach. Academic Services Journal Prince of Songkla University. 25(1): 93-102. (in Thai)
Kheovichai, K. 2019. Participatory action research and empowerment of teacher and educational personnel. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal 11(1): 1-12. (in Thai)
Kimwarey, M.C., H.N. Chirure and M. Omondi. 2014. Teacher empowerment in education practice: Strategies, constraints and suggestions. Journal of Research & Method in Education. 4(2): 51-56.
Klangvijit, W. 2013. Development network administration model of Rajabhat University central area group. Journal of Education Studies 41(3): 201-212.
Meyer, T. 2002. Novice teacher learning communities: An alternative to one-on-one mentoring. American Secondary Education 31(1): 27-42.
Mekwichai, J. 2014. Development of an empowerment system for knowledge transfer in colleges of medicine towards being “talented” organizations. Journal of Education Studies 42(1): 20-34. (in Thai)
Nathongchai, S. and W. Charoensin. 2018. The model of network management in producing doctors at faculty of medicine, Naresuan University. Chiangrai Medical Journal 10(1): 49-58. (in Thai)
Ruchirat, S. 2015. Empowerment to develop instructional competency of teachers that promote happiness learning of students. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal. 13(1): 104-113. (in Thai)
Short, P.M. and J.S. Rinehart. 1992. School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of level of empowerment within the school environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement 52(4): 951-960.
Triwaranyu, C. 2017. Development of professional learning community through lesson study: An approach and guideline for success. Journal of Education Studies 45(1): 299-319. (in Thai)
Zimmerman, M.A. and J. Rappaport. 1988. A citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology 16(5): 725-750.