The The Development of Analytical Thinking of Grade 6 Students by Using Constructivist and Graphic Organizer
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were: 1) To enhance the analytical thinking skill of Grade 6 students after studying with constructivist approach and graphic organizer technique. 2) To compare students’ learning achievement of students before and after studying with constructivist approach and graphic organize and 3) to evaluate students’ satisfaction after studying with constructivist approach and graphic organizer technique. The target group was 20 students of Grade 6 in the first semester of the academic year 2022 from Watsrakatiem School (Sathapontaksinakan). The research instruments were 1) the lesson plans 2) analytical thinking skills assessment 3) an achievement test and 4) satisfaction survey of students towards studying with constructivist approach and graphic organizer technique. The data were statistically analyzed by mean () and standard deviation (). The results of this research were: 1) The overview of analytical thinking skill of Grade 6 after studying with constructivist approach and graphic organizer technique in the first time ( = 2.58, = 0.58) in the second time ( = 2.72, = 0.50) in the third time ( = 2.77, = 0.48) and in the fourth time ( = 2.82, = 0.37) were steadily increasing. 2) The learning achievement of students after studying with constructivist approach and graphic organize technique ( = 16.75, = 2.26) were higher than before ( = 7.40, = 2.99) with a 73.91% increase in development. 3) The student’s satisfaction towards studying with constructivist approach and graphic organizer technique were at the high level ( = 2.87, = 0.07).
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Angkanapatkajorn, V. (2012). Everything you should know for math teachers : Teaching
and Research Curriculum. Bangkok: Charansanitwong Printing Co.Ltd., Category.
(in Thai)
Driver, R,H, and bell. (1986). Student thinking and the learning of seience : A
constructivist. The School Review 67(240) : 443-456.
Fugkhao, S. (1993). The Development of Instructional System for Meaningful Learning in
Chemistry.
Hanpithak, K. (2016). The Effects of Learning Management Base on Constructivist Theory
Mathematical Concepts And Problem-Solving Ability on The Topic of
Triables of Grade 5 Students. Master of Education Program in Mathematics
Teaching Burapha University. (in Thai)
Khaemmani, T. .(2019). Pedagogical Sciences : Knowledge for effective organization of
learning Processes. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Kowtrakwl, S.(2013). Educational psychology. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Laowreandee, W., Kitroongrueng, P. and Sirisamphan, O. (2017). Proactive learning
management strategy To develop thinking and raise the quality of
education for the 21st century. Nakhon Pathom: Phetkasem Printing Group
Company Limited. (in Thai).
Ministry of Education. (2012). Professional Science Teachers Approaches to effective
teaching and learning. Bangkok: Intereducation Supplies. (in Thai)
Nueng Chalerm, P. (2014). Learning Science in the 21st Century. Maha Sarakham: Aphichat
Printing LTD., Part.
PISA Centre. (2021). PISA Assessment Results 2018 Reading, Mathematics and Science.
Bangkok: Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST).
(in Thai)
Pruengam, N. (2011).Developing Grade 11 Student’ Analytical Thinking Ability and
Learning Achievement in Chemistry on Acid-Base Using Problem-Based
Learning (PBL). Master of Education Program in Educationl Administration
Khonkaen University .(in Thai)
Sinlarat, P.(2020). 4 thought for Thai children. Bangkok ;Dhurakij Pundit University. (in Thai)
Worrakamin, D.(2016). project research report “A study of the ability to think critically
and to have a public mind to develop the potential of being a good
person of Thai students”. Bangkok ;Dhurakij Pundit University. (in Thai)
Yager, R. G. (1991). The Constructivist Learning Model”. The Science Teacher. (58)10, 52-57.