THE DEVELOPMENT OF CASE-BASED LEARNING MODEL INTEGRATED WITH GROUP INVESTIGATION TECHNIQES TO ENHANCE CRITICAL THINKING AND LEGAL LITERACY IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims were to 1) develop a learning model using case studies as a basis combined with the Group Investigation (GI) technique to enhance high school students' critical thinking skills and legal literacy. 2) study the effectiveness of the learning model using case studies as a basis combined with the GI technique to promote high school students' critical thinking skills and legal literacy. 2.1) compare the critical thinking abilities before and after learning through the GI model. 2.2) assess the legal literacy of students who learn through this learning model. The sample group for the research consists of 35 students from the 5th year of high school at a demonstration school of a university, enrolled in the course S 30223 Law in Daily Life, semester 1 of the academic year 2024, selected using simple random sampling. The research instruments include : A learning model using case studies as a basis combined with the GI technique, A manual for implementing the learning model, A learning management plan, An assessment tool for critical thinking skills and An assessment tool for legal literacy. The learning model using case studies as a basis combined with the GI technique consists of 5 components 1) Principles 1.2) Objectives 1.3) The learning management process includes 4 steps : Step 1: Explore and understand the problem or situation (Exploration: E). Step 2: Analyze, critique, and discuss the problem or situation collaboratively (Discussion: D). Step 3: Select and create strategies to solve the problem or situation (Selection: S). Step 4: Evaluate the results and apply the findings (Evaluation: E). 1.4 Measurement and evaluation 1.5 Success factors 4) Effectiveness of the Learning Model. 4.1) Students had an average score for critical thinking skills after learning of 36.09 (S.D.=2.68), which was significantly higher than before learning at the .05 level. 4.2) The average score for legal literacy after learning was (x̅ =34.69, S.D. = 4.99), which indicates a very good level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bunjong Amornchivan. (2013). Critical Thinking: Principles of Developing Logical Thinking, Reasoning, and Judgement. Nonthaburi: Amarin Book Center. (in Thai)
Charin Mungkhun. (2018). Knowledge Transfer of Royal Knowledge to Promote Green Citizenship among Learners in the Royal Project Areas of Northern Thailand. Veridian E-Journal Silpakorn University, 11(1), 1503-1521. (in Thai)
Chuwit Chaiyabao. (2009). A Study of Case Study Teaching Methods and Their Effects on Learning Achievement in Basic Social Science on Culture. Retrieved on September 2, 2024, from http://eduweb.kpru.ac.th/pdf/rs15.pdf. (in Thai)
Department of Academic Affairs, Ministry of Education. (2017). The Organization of Learning Content in the Thai Language Learning Area According to the Core Curriculum for Basic Education B.E. 2551. Bangkok: Department of Academic Affairs. (in Thai)
Nawaphat Trakulporn and Nilmani Pitak. (2015). Developing Critical Thinking Skills and Knowledge-Seeking Skills of Grade 11 Students through Problem-Based Learning Activities Combined with Group Investigation Techniques. Journal of Education, Khon Kaen University, 38(4), 97-98. (in Thai)
National Economic and Social Development Council. (2023). Strategic Framework for Addressing Poverty Issues 2023-2027. Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister. (in Thai)
Thitsana Khammanee et al. (2001). Cognitive Science. Bangkok: The Master Group Management Co., Ltd. (in Thai)
Thitsana Khammanee. (2002). Thinking and Teaching to Develop Thinking Processes. Bangkok: Office of the National Primary Education Commission. (in Thai)
Wimolrat Leehasunon. (2008). A Study of Science Learning Outcomes and Emotional Intelligence in Social Skills of Grade 7 Students through Group Inquiry-Based Learning. Master’s Thesis, Major in Secondary Education, Srinakharinwirot University. (in Thai)
Watchara Luearndee. (2009). Models and Strategies for Learning Management to Develop Thinking Skills. 4th Edition. Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University. (in Thai)
Sukon Sinthaphanant. (2010). Innovations in Teaching and Learning to Enhance the Quality of Youth. Bangkok: Akson Charoenthat. (in Thai)
Suwit Munkham and Arathai Munkham. (2002). 21 Learning Management Methods to Develop Thinking Processes. Bangkok: Phaepim. (in Thai)
Royal Institute Office. (2019). Contemporary Educational Vocabulary Dictionary, Smart Knowledge (Literacy) Edition. Bangkok: Royal Institute Office. (in Thai)
Brookfield, S. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. ST. Paul, IL: Open University Press.
Creswell, J.W., and Plano Clark, V.L.(2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed.CA: Sage.
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. New York : D.C. Healt and Company
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). “A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skill,” Educational Leadership. 43(6) : 45-48.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., and Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching. 8th ed. New York: Allyn& Bacon.
Kruse, K. (2008). Introduction to Instructional Design and the ADDIE Model. [Online]. Retrieved October 15, 2019. from http://www.transformativedesigns.com/id_systems. html
Yinger, R. J. (1980). New Directions for Teaching and Learning : Fostering Critical Thinking. Sanfrancisco : Jossery-Bass.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory. U.S.A.: Allvn and Bacon.
