Socratic Questioning Techniques for Critical Thinking
Main Article Content
Abstract
Critical thinking is important for learning and living in the present world because of the problem of believing in false advertisements for products and services. Being a victim of sexual crime through online conversations, the study found that the process of thinking critically has the following steps: 1) setting goals 2) identifying questions 3) processing information 4) forming hypotheses 5) drawing conclusions. Techniques that can be used to enhance critical thinking are techniques. Socratic questioning, the question format is as follows: 1) questions for opening minds, 2) questions for clarification, 3) questions for conceptualization, 4) questions that probe assumptions, 5) questions for literature to support those assumptions, 6) questions about viewpoints, 7) questions that probe implications and consequences, and 8) questions about definitions. In organizing learning, there are many formats and methods for organizing learning that create critical thinking. The Socratic questioning technique is another method to strengthen the intellectual defenses to be able to live in society in every era, knowingly and not being a victim of any crime.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Amornchewin, A. (2013a). Critical Thinking. Bangkok: Parbpin company Limited.
______________. (2013b). Thinking Classroom, Transform the classroom into a thinking room through philosophical inquiry. Bangkok: Critical Thinking Institute.
Binreem, S. (2021). Development of Measurement Scale on Critical Thinking Skills in the 21st Century for Lower Secondary School Students by Applying Polytomous Item Response Theory (in Thai). [Master’s thesis]. PSU Knowledge Bank. http://kb.psu.ac.th:8080/psukb/handle/2016/17834
Decaroli, J. (1973) “What Reason Say to The Classroom Teacher: Critical Thinking”. Social Education, 37(1), 67 – 68.
Deway, J. (1933). How We Think. New York: D.C. Healt and Company.
Fisher, R. (1998). Teaching Thinking: Philosophical Enquiry in the Classroom. London: Cassell.
Kaenin, T. (2011). Socratic teaching method (in Thai). Journal of Education Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus. 22(2), 156 – 166.
Khammanee, T. (2005). Pedagogical science: knowledge for organizing learning processes that promote problem solving abilities for students in higher education (in Thai). Journal of Education. Mahasarakham University. 12(12). 83–96.
_____________. (2017). Teaching science (21 ed). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University publishing house.
Ministry of Education. (2010). National Education Act B.E. 2542 and edited additional (No. 2) B.E. 2545 and (No. 3) B.E. 2010. Bangkok: Printing House, Shipping and Parcel Organization.
Munkham, S. (2002). Critical Thinking Teaching Strategies (in Thai). (3rd printing). Bangkok: Pubpim.
Nekmanurak, P. (1994). Development of a model of developing critical thinking for teacher students (in Thai). Doctorate of Education Thesis graduate school. Chulalongkorn University.
Paul, R.W. (1990). Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. Rohnert Park, CA: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique.
Phakhaphamongkholchai, W. (2016). The Development of Critical Thinking Skills on Microeconomics Using Research-Based Learning of Matthayomsuksa 5 Students. (in Thai). [Master’s thesis]. http://ithesis-ir.su.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/1060
Phoyen, K. (2022). How to teach students to think critically (in Thai). Journal of education Silpakorn University, 20(4), 11-25.
Phra Brahmapundit (Dhammacitto, P.). (2016). Greek philosophy: the source of Western wisdom (8th ed). Bangkok: Siam Paritut Publishing.
Pornkul, C. (2011). Teaching Thinking Process, Theory and Practice. (2th ed). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University publishing house.
Scriven, M. and R. Paul. (1999). National Council for Critical Thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/the-national-council-for-excellence-in-critical-thinking/406
Siripongnapat, V. (2023). The Enhancement of Active Citizenship for Learners through Socratic Questioning. Journal of Education Studies, 51(1), EDUCU5101008 (13 pages) doi: 10.14456/educu.2023.8. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDUCU/article/view/258400
Songkroh, S. (2019). The Development of Critical Thinking Ability on good Democratic Citizenship of Mattayom five Student Using Problem-Based Learning Management (in Thai). [Master’s thesis]. Ithesis. http://ithesis-ir.su.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/2703
Sriwat, L. (2006). Thinking. Bangkok: Odeon Store.
Suarez-Alvarez, J. (2021), “Are 15-year-olds prepared to deal with fake news and misinformation?”, PISA in Focus, No. 113, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/6ad5395e-en.
Tosuksri,W. (n.d.). Clinical Teaching: Questioning (in Thai). Feculty of Nursing. https://ns.mahidol.ac.th/english/th/departments/MN/th/med-index.html
University of Kent. (2022). Independent learning & critical thinking. https://www.kent.ac.uk/guides/independent-learning-and-critical-thinking/critical-thinking