Activity-Based Learning in Mathematics Classroom
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mathematics instruction in most Thai schools could not bring about an interesting learning lessons because of highly abstract contents. This therefore affected the mathematics performance of students when considered the unsatisfactory result from a national assessment. One of the most important factors affecting learning achievement of students was the instruction style of mathematics teachers using traditional teaching methods. The traditional methods may not be effective for mathematics instruction nowadays, therefore Active Learning seem to be an effective learning method. This article proposed a strategy and instructional framework for Activity-based learning according to the approach of active Learning. It was found important principles for using activity-based learning in mathematics classrooms were 1) Learning thrives when learners discover the knowledge by themselves during instructional activities 2) Learning comes from proper practical action 3) Learning grows when Mathematical concepts are concrete 4)Participation from learners is a key mechanism for learning process 5) Self-learning requires individual feeling and intelligence. The framework can support learners to naturally learn on the basis of the different learning ability of the individual.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Azuka, B. F. (2013). Means of Evaluating job of teaching. Journal of Education and Practice,
(13), 8-15.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future, The Clearing
House. Journal of Educational Strategies, 83(1), 39-43.
Education Resources Information Centre. (2012). Activity learning in elementary school
Mathematics. [Online]. Retrieved September 21, 2021, from http://www.eric,ed.gov/ERICwebportal/search/detailmini.jsp.html
Elliot, S., Thomas, A., & Joan L. (2002). Educational psychology; effective teaching, and
effective learning (3rd ed.). MC Graw Hill.
Emaikwu, S. O. (2012). Assessing the relative effectiveness of the three teaching methods in
the measurement of students’ achievement in mathematics. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 3(4), 479-486.
Hung, D., Tan, S. C., & Koh, T. S. (2006). Engaged learning: Making learning an authentic
experience. In D. Hung & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies. Dordrecht.
Kaka, M. O. (2007). Games assisted instructional materials–A strategy for enhancing
students’ achievement in integrated sciences. Journal of Research in Curriculum and Teaching, 2(1), 120-128.
Max, A. S. (1998). Teaching mathematics, A source book of aids, activities and strategies
(2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Mackeachie, W. J. & Svinicki, M. (2006). Mackeachie’s Teaching Tips. Houghton Mifflin.
Mckeachie, W. J. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A Review of the
Research Literature. Ann Arbor: Regents of the University of Michigan.
National Institute of Educational Testing Service. (2021). National Quality Assurance Examination
Result 2020. [Online]. Retrieved August 2, 2021, from https://www.niets.or.th/th/
catalog/view/280.html. (in Thai)
Ojonubah, J. O. (2009). The Influence of English Language Background on Mathematic
Achievement for Achieving National Agenda. Journal of Education, 5(1), 80–89.
Stoblein, M. (2009). Activity-based learning experiences in quantitative research
methodology for young scholars. [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2021, from
www.pomsmeetings.org/...../011-0782.html
Treat, A., Wang, W., Chadha, R., & Hart Dixon, M. (2008). Major Developments in Instructional
Technology: Prior to the 20th Century. [Online]. November 17, 2021, from http://www.indiana.edu/~idt/shortpapers/documents/ITprior20.htm