EMERGING TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR ENHANCING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCE IN BACHELOR OF EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN THAILAND

Main Article Content

Teerayut Satjabut
Duangkamol Traiwichitkhun
Suwimon Wongwanich

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and synthesize the emerging trends and directions in promoting intercultural competence within the Bachelor of Education curriculum in Thailand—an essential competence for teachers in an increasingly diverse and interconnected world. The research was conducted in two phases. First, a scoping review was employed to examine the general state of teacher education curricula in Thailand and to synthesize key characteristics of effective interventions for fostering intercultural competence. The data were analyzed using narrative synthesis. Second, in-depth interviews were conducted to explore trends, future directions, and curriculum design approaches relevant to multicultural education. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, with values coding applied in the coding process. The key findings reveal that, while Thai teacher education curricula emphasize academic skills and moral development, they lack a systematic and explicit integration of intercultural competence. Furthermore, the synthesis of international research on effective interventions highlights that promoting intercultural competence requires experiential learning, critical self-reflection, active student participation, and the creation of culturally safe learning environments. The findings suggest that curriculum development should shift from a content-centered framework to a fully integrated multicultural curriculum. This includes alignment at all levels—objectives, content, pedagogy, and assessment—in order to prepare future teachers to navigate and facilitate learning effectively in multicultural societies with a strong sense of social consciousness.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Byram, M. (2021). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence: Revisited. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018). CASP qualitative checklist. Retrieved 1 April 2025, from https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/qualitative-studies-checklist/

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10 (3), 241-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002

Deardorff, D. K. (2020). Manual for developing intercultural competencies: Story circles. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.

Downs, S. H. & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of epidemiology & community health, 52 (6), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.52.6.377

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

Gorski, P. C. & Swalwell, K. (2015). Equity literacy for all. Educational Leadership, 72 (6), 34-40. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1062914

Holmes, P. & O’Neill, G. (2012). Developing and evaluating intercultural competence: Ethnographies of intercultural encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36 (5), 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.04.010

Hooper, P., Jutai, J. W., Strong, G. & Russell-Minda, E. (2008). Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation: A systematic review. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 43 (2), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.3129/i08-001

Jackson, J. (2018). Interculturality in international education: Critical approaches. New York: Routledge.

Mezirow, J. (2018). Transformative learning theory. In I. Knud, Ed. Contemporary theories of learning. (pp. 84-96). London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147277

OECD. (2018). PISA for development assessment and analytical framework: Reading, mathematics and science. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264305274-en

Page, M. J. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International journal of surgery, 88, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Richardson, W. S., Wilson, M. C., Nishikawa, J. & Hayward, R. S. (1995). The well-built clinical question: A key to evidence-based decisions. ACP Journal Club, 123 (3), A-12. https://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-1995-123-3-A12

Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, UK: SAGE.

Sleeter, C. E. (2011). The academic and social value of ethnic studies: A research review. Washington, DC: National Education Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435

Tervalon, M. & Murray-Garcia, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9 (2), 117-125. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/268076

Times Higher Education. (2024). Asia university rankings 2024. Retrieved 12 April 2024, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2024/regional-ranking#!/length/25/locations/THA/subjects/3108/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats

UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.54675/DRHC3544