Guidelines for Spatial Design within Lecture Classrooms Consistent with the Users' Needs
Keywords:
Perception, Lecture Classroom, Spatial DesignAbstract
Architectural theory is fundamental in analyzing space and reasonable geometric shapes within buildings. It also depends on the nature of the building to meet social attitudes and appropriate behavior in buildings with complex spaces. Distinguishing spatial elements must begin with separating proportions and showing the transformation of physical locations into easily understandable elements. The passage from one physical location to another is a common functional connection, which is why space emerges in how people use it. There is occupation of space, and there is movement. The duty level determines what the building should look like. Its function is the first screening in the field to analyze existing architectural features. The second is the culture of each ethnic group or the needs of the type of building. The third is the structural features of buildings that have different purposes in each building. Guidelines for designing floor plans within the physical learning environment that are consistent with the needs of users with different characteristics can promote effective teaching and learning. It also helps create interest and foster discipline among students. The physical environment of learning is one part that encourages students to be interested in lessons and become more motivated to learn. Therefore, creating an atmosphere in the physical learning environment is extremely important.
References
Ching, F. D. K., (1987). Interior Design Illustrated. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Devlin, K. & Nasar, J. L. (1989). The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 333-344.
Gifford, R. & Fan Ng, C. (1982). The relative contribution of visual and auditory cues to environmental perception. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 275-284.
Gifford, R. et.al, (2000). Decoding Modern Architecture: A Lens Model Approach for Understanding the Aesthetic Differences of Architects and Laypersons. Environment and Behavior. 163-187.
Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. Variances in the Impact of Visual Stimuli on Design Problem Solving Performance. Faculty of Architecture & Town Planning, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000. Israel. 2006. 549-569.
Groat, L. (1982). Meaning in post-modern architecture: An examination using the multiple sorting task. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 3-22.
Herbert Van, H. et.al, (1985). Comparative Floor plan-analysis as a mean to Develop Design Guidelines. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 155-179.
Leeniva, P. (2003). Study of guidelines for designing outpatient departments that are consistent with the behavior and satisfaction of service users. Case study: 60-bed community hospital, Chachoengsao Province [Master Degree of Architecture]. King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang.
Ritterfeld, U. & Cupchik, G. C. (1996). Perception of Interior Spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 349-360.
Steinfeld, E. et.al, (1999). Enabling Environment. New York. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publisher.
Weber, O. (2001). Perception of Environmental Risks of Company Sites. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 165-178.
Wolfgang, F.E. et.al., (1988). Post-Occupancy Evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Faculty of Industrial Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของคณะวิศวกรรมศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยีอุตสาหกรรม มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
