Factors Affecting Student Retention in Caregiver Education in Chonburi Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aimed to (1) examine differences in caregiver-education student retention by demographic characteristics, (2) examine the levels of learning motivation, perceived value, quality of learning experience, and student retention, and (3) analyze the effects of learning motivation, perceived value, and quality of learning experience on student retention. This quantitative study collected questionnaire data from 400 students enrolled in caregiver schools in Chonburi Province. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, independent-samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Games-Howell post hoc comparisons, simple linear regression, and multiple linear regression at the .05 significance level. The findings showed that (1) student retention differed significantly by sex, age, educational level, and length of study; (2) learning motivation (M = 4.77, SD = 0.44), perceived value (M = 4.65, SD = 0.49), quality of learning experience (M = 4.72, SD = 0.46), and student retention (M = 4.58, SD = 0.44) were all at the highest level; and (3) in separate regressions, motivation, perceived value, and learning-experience quality positively predicted retention, explaining 18.30%, 19.90%, and 23.90% of the variance, respectively. In the multiple-regression model, the three predictors jointly explained 26.20% of the variance (R² = .262; adjusted R² = .257; F = 46.953, p < .001). Quality of learning experience was the strongest predictor (β = .320, p < .001), followed by motivation (β = .161, p = .011), whereas perceived value was not significant when the predictors were considered simultaneously (β = .083, p = .280). These findings suggest that caregiver schools should prioritize high-quality learning experiences and sustained learner motivation to support students’ intention to remain enrolled through program completion.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in articles in the Journal of Arts of Management It is the responsibility of the author of the article. and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team I agree that the article is copyright of the Arts and Management Journal.
References
Amado, M., Guzmán, A., & Juarez, F. (2023). Relationship between perceived value, student experience, and university reputation: Structural equation modeling. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 780. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02272-y
Chong, P. Y., Kam, A. J. Y., & Tham, S. Y. (2024). Factors influencing international students’ perceived value and satisfaction at private universities in Malaysia. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 11(2), 255–334. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2592
Edge, D., & Gladstone, N. (2022). Exploring support strategies for improving nursing student retention. Nursing Standard, 37(9), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2022.e11914
Hovdhaugen, E., Sweetman, R., & Thomas, L. (2023). Institutional scope to shape persistence and departure among nursing students: Re-framing Tinto for professional degrees. Tertiary Education and Management, 29, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-022-09111-w
Jeffreys, M. R. (2022). Nursing student retention and success: Action innovations and research matters. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 17(1), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2021.06.010
Kelly, M., Willis, R., & Nieuwoudt, J. (2022). A sense of belonging at university: Student retention, motivation and enjoyment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1955844
Lee, Y., & Song, H.-D. (2022). Motivation for MOOC learning persistence: An expectancy–value theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 958945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958945
Mingo, S. R., & Wolf, Z. R. (2024). Academic program enhancement supporting the success of undergraduate nursing students and graduates. Journal of Professional Nursing, 53, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.02.007
Qvortrup, A., & Lykkegaard, E. (2022). Study environment factors associated with retention in higher education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 7(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2022.2072361
Sweetman, R., Hovdhaugen, E., & Thomas, L. (2023). The (dis)integration of nursing students: Multiple transitions, fragmented integration and implications for retention. Tertiary Education and Management, 29, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-022-09106-7
Termjai, P., Khattiyasuwan, S., Suriyasookprasert, P., Mungmee, S., & Songsang, W. (2024). The academic administrations affecting the management of active learning in basic educational institutions under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Surin. Arts of Management Journal, 8(2), 415–427. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jam/article/view/269819
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089
Toyinbo, P., Rugs, D., Nedd, N., Wang, X., Hall, K. S., Hyacinthe, M., & Cowan, L. (2023). Retention in nursing education and scholarship programs: Survival analysis of the Veterans Health Administration National Nursing Education Initiative Data. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(8), 3069–3081. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15655