The Evaluation of Master of Education Administration Graduate School, Rajapark Institute
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were to: (1) evaluate the Master of Education Program in Educational Administration, and (2) explore approaches for its development and improvement. This research employed a mixed-methods approach. The sample (N=250) comprised 130 current students and 120 graduates. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed with frequency distribution, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The findings revealed that the suitability of the curriculum's context, process, and product was at the highest level. The input factor, however, demonstrated a high level of suitability. For curriculum development and improvement, subjects essential for administration should be categorized as compulsory courses. The curriculum should incorporate increased content on the application of technology in administration. Additionally, academic conferences should be organized, and students should be encouraged to present their work to enhance their academic skills and expertise.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in articles in the Journal of Arts of Management It is the responsibility of the author of the article. and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team I agree that the article is copyright of the Arts and Management Journal.
References
Best, J. W. (1977). Research in education (3rd ed., illustrated). Prentice-Hall.
Chantavanich, S. (2022). Qualitative research methods (26th ed., Rev. ed.). Chulalongkorn University.
Cheunsuksomwang, N., & Theeranurak Jaruchainiwat, P. (2014). A needs assessment to develop early childhood teachers’ professional competency. OJED, 9(1), 713-727. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/OJED/article/view/37268/36162
Good, G.V. (1973). Dictionary of Education (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Homfung, C., Ruamsuk, S., Natha, N., Khumnungphon, R., Punyajirawiti, W., Pungpong, P. (2016). An evaluation of bachelor of education program in Thai language Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 9(3), 408–420. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Veridian-E-Journal/article/view/73215/58932
Kaew-urai, W. (2021). Curriculum development: From theory to practice. Naresuan University.
Ketchararat, M., Buasuwan, P., & Wichitpatcharaporn, W. (2015). A study of desirable competencies of Kasetsart University lecturers. Journal of Education Studies, Chulalongkorn University, 43(1), 112–127. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDUCU/article/view/32658
Khananan, S. (2005). The evaluation of the master of education program in Educational Administration, Faculty of Education, Uttaradit Rajabhat University[Master’s Thesis, Uttaradit Rajabhat University].
Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Nillapun, M. (2011). The curriculum evaluation on doctor of philosophy program in curriculum and instruction, Faculty of Education Silpakorn University. Veridian E-Journal, SU, 4(2), 248-262. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Veridian-E-Journal/article/view/27188/23098
Nillapun, M. (2012). The evaluation of master of education program in curriculum and supervision Faculty of Education Silpakorn University. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 4(2), 25-40. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/suedureasearchjournal/article/view/28267/24299
Office of the Education Council, Ministry of Education. (2017). The National Scheme of Education B.E. 2560-2579 (2017-2036). https://www.onec.go.th/us.php/home/category/CAT0001145
Phonsiri, A. (2005). Evaluation of the master of Arts Program in Home Economics for Community Development, Faculty of Education, Ramkhamhaeng University[Research report]. Department of Home Economics, Ramkhamhaeng University.
Prasertsuk, N. et al. (2008). Evaluation of the Master of Arts Program in Community Psychology[Research report]. Department of Psychology and Guidance, Silpakorn University, Sanam Chandra Palace Campus.
Prasitwutiwet, W. (1999). Curriculum development: Continuing the local context. The Discovery Co., Ltd.
Rueangphanit, P. (2010). An evaluation of a bachelor of education degree program in pre-school education under the corporation of educational personnel development of local administration organization between department of local administration and Suan Dusit Rajabhat University: The case study of Nakhonsawan Academic Center. Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 133-140.
Sirisooksilp, S. (2021). Educational supervision leadership. Khon Kaen University.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). Education evaluation and decision making. F.E. Peacock Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D.L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan, (Eds.), Evaluation models (2nd ed.). (Chapter 16). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and Practice. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Wangthanomsak, M. (2010). Evaluation of the doctor of philosophy program in curriculum and education, Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University. Silpakorn University.
