The Development of Management Model to Improve the Quality of Vocational Education Teachers Under the Office of Vocational Education Commission Chonburi
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to develop a management model to improve the quality of vocational education teachers under the Office of Vocational Education Commission in Chonburi. The research procedure was divided into three steps: Step 1: Study the conditions of management to improve the quality of vocational education teachers under the Office of Vocational Education Commission Chonburi. Data were collected from 244 administrators and teachers. And key informants through in-depth interviews with nine experts. Step 2: Create and examine a management model to improve the quality of vocational education teachers under the Office of Vocational Education Commission, Chonburi by the administrator of the Bureau of Personnel Competency Development, the administrator of Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, and the administrators of vocational education, totaling 10 people. Step 3: Evaluation of the feasibility and utility of a management model to improve the quality of vocational education teachers under the Office of Vocational Education Commission Chonburi by the college director, deputy director, and teachers who were head of department at Pattaya Technical College, totaling 40 people. The research instruments were a semi-structured interview form, a questionnaire, and an evaluation form. Quantitative data were analyzed by a computer program, whereas quality data were analyzed using a content analysis technique. The statistics used for data analysis were mean, standard deviation, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and chi-square.
The research found that the development of a management model to improve the quality of vocational education teachers under the Office of Vocational Education Commission Chonburi consists of seven main components: 1) Learning management development; 2) Coaching; 3) Bilateral vocational education management; 4) Planner; 5) Creation of innovation; 6) Learning community; and 7) Management process (POCLCE) consists of planning, organizing, coordinating, leading, controlling, and evaluating. The results of the model evaluation in terms of accuracy, propriety, feasibility, and utility overall subcomponents and all indicators were consistent (p-value >.05).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in articles in the Journal of Arts of Management It is the responsibility of the author of the article. and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team I agree that the article is copyright of the Arts and Management Journal.
References
Bartol, K. M., & Martin, D. C. (1997). Management. McGraw-Hill.
Bovee, C.L. & et al. (1993). Management. McGraw-Hill.
Bureau of Personnel Competency Development. (2022). Policy for developing teachers and
vocational education personnel. Office of the Vocational Education Commission. https://bpcd.vec.go.th.
Cronbach. L.J. (1970). Essentials of Psychological Testing. Harper & Row.
Dalf, R. (2006). The New Era of Management: International Edition. Thompson.
Dechakupt, P. et al. (2012). Teacher Competency and Guidelines for Teacher Development in a
Changing Society. Dhurakij Pundit University.
Drucker, P.F. (2007). Monagement: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practice. Transaction Publishers.
DuBrin, A.J. (2011). Essentials of Management (6th ed.). South-Western.
Erawan, P. (2018). How does Singapore Produce and Develop Teachers?. Suratthani Rajabhat
Journal, 5(2), 61-84. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/srj/article/view/149551
Ermuthai, S. (2021). Guidelines for developing teachers and Vocational Education Personnel for the
year 2022 for driving policy Education of careers and building the country's competitiveness. CSNP-Journal, 6(2), 3-12. https://ph01.tci-haijo.org/index.php/csnp_veis1
/article/view/247295
Fayol, H. (1916). General and Industrial Management. Pitman.
Futemwong, N., Piyanonthasin, W., Prasongsuk, K., & Promsuwicha, S. (2021). Foreign Teacher
Preparation Context: The Lesson is Capable to apply to Thai Education System. The Journal
of Pacific Institute of Management Sciences (Humanities and Social Sciences), 7(2), 46-
https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pacific/article/view/253177
Gregg, R.T. (1957). The Administrative Process. In Administrative Behavior in Education, 274 R.F. Cambell and R.T. Gregg. Harper and Row.
Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (1937). Papers on the Science of Administration. Institute of Public Administration.
Kabilan, M. K. (2004). Online Professional Development: A Literature Analysis of Teacher
Competency. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(2), 51-57. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ876878.pdf
Koontz, H. (1972). Principles of Management: An Analysis of Managerial Functions. McGraw-Hill. Koontz, H., & Weihrich, H. (1988). Management. McGraw-Hill. Koul, L. (1984). Methodology of Educational Research. Vikas Publishing House. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. Laohavichienwhich, U. (2005). Public Administration: Nature of the Subject and Various
Dimensions (13th ed.). Sematham.
Likert, R. (1976). The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. McGraw-Hill.
Ministry of Education. (2021). Announcement of Policies and Focuses of the Ministry of Education.
Fiscal year 2023. Ministry of Education.
Merakha, P. (2017). Teacher’s Characteristics of 21st Century. MBU Education Journal, 5(2), 23-
http://ojs.mbu.ac.th/index.php/edj/article/view/152
Munastiwi, E. (2015). The Management Model of Vocational Education Quality Assurance Using
‘Holistic Skills Education (Holsked). In 4th World Congress on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (WoCTVET), 5th–6th November 2014, Malaysia, 218-230.
Nastasi, B. K., & Schensul, S. L. (2005). Contributions of Qualitative Research to the Validity of
Intervention Research. Journal of School Psychology, 43(3), 177–195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.04.003
National Legislative Assembly. (2017). Report on the study of vocational teachers: production,
development and standards for vocational teachers. Education and Sports Commission.
Office of the Commission 3. Office of the Secretary of the Senate Performing duties of the
Secretariat.
Nuangchalerm P. (2020). Teachers in the 21st Century. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences,
Mahasarakham University, 39(1), 15-24.
Office of the Secretary of the National Strategy Committee. (2017). The 20-Year National Strategic Plan. Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board.
Office of the Education Council. (2015). Status of Production and Develop Teachers in Thailand (Research report). Office of the Education Council, Ministry of Education, Thailand.
Office of Vocational Education Commission. (2017). Lecture on the situation of the shortage of vocational teachers. Parliament Meeting Room, July, 14 2017. Parmwong, E., Sikkhabundit, S., & Theerawitthayalert, P. (2016). A Model Management on
Vocational Teacher Development in Technology Application for Work Efficiency. Journal of
Chandrakasemsarn, 22(42), 61-70.
Prachyapruit, A. (2017). Development of Teacher Preparation Models to Serve Education 4.0.
Romphruek Journal Krirk University, 35(3), 101-135.
Prasertsri, R. (2006). Modern Management. Thammasan.
Prasitratsin, S. (2011). Project Evaluation: Principles and Applications (2nd ed.). Samlada. Sabherwal, R., & Becerra-Fernandez, I. (2003). An Empirical Study of the Effect of Knowledge
Management Processes at Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels. Decision Sciences, 34, 225-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5915.02329
Saengthong, T. et al. (2021). Adaptation of Thai Teachers in the VUCA World Era. Poll Talk
Exclusive SDU. Suan Dusit University.
Srichomkwan, W. (2013). An A Management Model for Thai Vocational Competency Based Staff
Development. Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal, 3(3), 68-81. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/ index.php/phdssj/article/view/71406
Siridhrungsri, P. (2014). Improving the Quality of Thai Teachers in the 21st Century. Quality
Learning Foundation. https://dol.thaihealth.or.th/resourcecenter/sites/default/files/ documents/kaarykradabkhunphaaphkhruuaithyainstwrrsthii_2.pdf
Somphakdee, P. (2021). Development of Thai Teachers to 21st Century. Journal of Graduate Saket
Review, 5(2), 19–30. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/saketreview/article/view/248930
Thippamas, T., Chairuang, N., & Somkhaoyai, T. (2021). The Development of Employee Retention Model in Private Vocational College of Southern Thai. Journal of Arts Management, 5(3), 972-985.
Vocational College in Chonburi Province. (2020-2021). Self Assessment Report (SAR) Academic Year 2020-2021. Under the Office of the Vocational Education Commission in Chonburi Province.
Wiratniphawan, W. (2005). Management and Development Administration of Constitutional Organizations and Government Agencies. Nititham.
Wongsakittikul, P., Pradubvate, R., Sukwan, C., & Vongyuttakrai, P. (2017). The Development of Vocational Management and Cooperation model to raise quality to international standards. Journal of Industrial Education, 11(2), 126-145. https://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/jindedu/article/view/9651