Ethical Dimensions of Pet Tourism: Balancing Human Enjoyment, Animal Welfare and Sustainable Hospitality
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pet tourism is expanding rapidly worldwide, reflecting a profound societal shift in which companion animals are increasingly regarded as integral members of the family unit. Despite this growth, the majority of pet-friendly service providers remain predominantly driven by commercial interests, with insufficient attention given to ethical considerations and animal welfare.
This article proposes a conceptual framework for ethical pet tourism, aimed at achieving a balanced equilibrium among human enjoyment, animal welfare, and the sustainable operation of hospitality businesses. The framework is grounded in the integration of three theoretical perspectives: Stakeholder Theory, which delineates the ethical responsibilities of all parties involved in pet tourism; the Triple Bottom Line of Sustainability, which extends the conventional 3P model — People, Planet — to include Pets as a third dimension of sustainable development; and Animal Welfare Theory, which establishes ethical standards based on the Five Freedoms framework.
The synthesis of these perspectives leads to the development of an Ethical Pet Tourism Model — a conceptual framework centered on principles of respect, compassion, and shared responsibility between humans and their animal companions. The article further offers practical recommendations for service businesses and public policy, advocating for ethical pet tourism as a foundational paradigm for contemporary tourism development
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารบริหารธุรกิจและสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความโดยตรง ซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย หรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใดๆ
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารบริหารธุรกิจและสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารบริหารธุรกิจและสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำบทความทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อ หรือเพื่อกระทำการใดๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากวารสารบริหารธุรกิจและสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง ก่อนเท่านั้น
References
Campbell, K. L., Yam, P. S., & Brown, H. (2016). The influence of dog walking on human–animal bonding. Anthrozoös, 29(4), 623-637.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2016.1228751
Carr, N. (2014). Dogs in the leisure experience. Annals of Leisure Research, 17(1), 56-71.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2014.890512
Chen, C. C., Lin, Y. H., & Yeh, T. C. (2022). Responsible tourism and ethical hospitality: A
stakeholder perspective. Tourism Review, 77(5), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-03-
-0163
Dashper, K. (2020). Human–animal relationships in tourism: Exploring encounters with nonhuman
animals. np.: Channel View Publications.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts,
evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. (2008). Understanding dog–human companionship. Journal of
Business Research, 61(5), 457-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.019
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. np.:
Capstone Publishing.
Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare: The science in its cultural context. Wiley-
Blackwell.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Grand View Research. (2022). Pet services market size, share & trends analysis report 2022–2030.
Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/pet-services-market
Hoy, L. S., Stangl, B., & Morgan, N. J. (2023). The social behavior of traveling with dogs: Drivers,
behavioral tendencies, and experiences. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 29(4), 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667231161505
Jamieson, D. (2019). Ethics, animals, and the environment: Extending stakeholder theory.
Environmental Ethics, 41(3), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201911221
Kirillova, K., Lehto, X. Y., & Cai, L. (2015). What triggers transformative tourism experiences? Tourism
Management, 46, 326-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.07.009
Rickly, J. M., & Kline, C. (2021). The emotional labor of dogs in tourism. Tourism Management
Perspectives, 39, 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100839
Sander, R., & Thøgersen, J. (2020). Empathy in hospitality service encounters: The missing link to
ethical experiences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 90-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.07.005
Sönmez, S. F., & Graefe, A. R. (1998). Influence of terrorism risk on foreign tourism decisions. Annals
of Tourism Research, 25(1), 112-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(97)00072-8
Ying, T., Norman, W. C., & Wang, S. (2021). Pet-friendly tourism: A review and research agenda.
Tourism Review, 76(3), 606-620. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-07-2020-0329
