Understanding the formation of moral and political-ethical values among high school and university students in Chiang Mai, Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
What are the moral values and characteristics of political-ethical judgment among Thai youth in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand, and how do they understand and reflect the moral framework and political identity within the context of Thai political-cultural norms? This study addresses these questions by applying moral foundation theory to the Thai political and cultural context to assess youths’ moral and political judgments. The study analyzed responses across eight domains (Rights and Freedom, Equality, Justice, Honesty and Loyalty, Harmony, Empathy, Authority and Respect, and Peace) using data collected through an online questionnaire hosted on the Thai Moral Foundations Research Project website. The findings, based on 137 responses from participants aged 15–20 years, reveal that honesty and loyalty, together with justice, are the most strongly endorsed moral values, and form a fairness-oriented core. Authority, respect, and equality are also highly valued, whereas rights and freedom receive the lowest level of endorsement. These results suggest that Thai youth in Chiang Mai construct a pluralistic moral framework in which fairness, honesty, and legitimate authority coexist with emotional sensitivity and a selective endorsement of individual rights and freedoms. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of Thai youths’ political identities, highlighting the dynamic interplay between traditional cultural values and ongoing democratic transformation in shaping their moral and political reasoning. Overall, these patterns may be interpreted as reflecting a hybrid moral framework.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All rights reserved. Apart from citations for the purposes of research, private study, or criticism and review,no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any other form without prior written permission by the publisher.
References
Chobphon, P. (2024). Global citizenship education in a politically polarised country: Thai teachers’ perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138, Article 104428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104428
Dubbink, W., & van Liedekerke, L. (2020). Rethinking the purity of moral motives in business: Kant against moral purism. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3), 379–393. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45386901
Dusanic, A., & Penev, P. P. (2009). The influence of the neoconservative movement on U.S. Foreign Policy. Connections, 8(2), 91–99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26326171
Ezedike, E. U. (2020). A contemporary analysis of Kant’s concept of goodwill and the categorical imperative. PINISI Discretion Review, 3(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.26858/pdr.v1i1.13625
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
Habermas, J. (1988). Legitimation crisis (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Polity Press. (Original work published 1973)
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon; Random House.
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
Iurino, K., & Saucier, G. (2020). Testing measurement invariance of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire across 27 countries. Assessment, 27(2), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118817916
Iwuagwu, E. K. (2019). Kant’s absolute good will and its implications for some current ethical issues like suicide, war and abortion. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 7(8), 3–14.
Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), Article e42366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
Jarernpanit, T. (2018). The moral disintegration and the politics of cultural emotions within Thailand’s current, deeply divided political conflicts. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 18(3), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.14456/hasss.2018.32
Jarernpanit, T. (2019). The contestation of “good politics”: Explaining conflict and polarisation in Thailand. Asian Studies Review, 43(4), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1663785
Kaewponngam, N. (2014). Ethics of politicians in Thailand. Nakhon Lampang Buddhist College’s Journal, 3(1). https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NBJ/article/view/253134 [in Thai]
Kanpanpong, K. (2011). The political legitimacy on political movement; People’s Alliance for Democracy (25 May–2 December, 2008) and National United Front of Democracy against Dictatorship (12 March–20 May, 2010) [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. TU Digital Collections. https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:120316 [in Thai]
Kemp, J. (1957). Foundations of morality. The Philosophical Quarterly, 7(29), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.2307/2217294
Klemme, H. F. (2010) The origin and aim of Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. In A. Reath & J. Timmermann (Eds.), Kant’s ‘Critique of Practical Reason’: A critical guide (pp. 11–30). Cambridge University Press.
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Lertchoosakul, K. (2021). The white ribbon movement: High school students in the 2020 Thai youth protests. Critical Asian Studies, 53(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.1883452
McCargo, D. (2021). Disruptors’ dilemma? Thailand’s 2020 Gen Z protests. Critical Asian Studies, 53(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.1876522
Metheechutikul, C. (2021). ‘Neo-gene’: The decline of the New Deal order and the emergence of American Neoconservatism [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. TU Digital Collections. https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:299662 [in Thai]
Prompanjai, A. (2019). The Thai style democratic regime (2006–2017) in Thai Bureaucratic Polity after the Thaksin Chinnawatra period. Journal of Social Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, 49(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v49i1.736 [in Thai]
Royal Institute. (n.d.). จริยธรรม [Ethics]. In Royal Institute dictionary. Retrieved November 5, 2026, from https://dictionary.orst.go.th/ [in Thai]
Sangkaew, T. (2013). The reflection on the concept of Max Weber’s political ethics. Srinakharinwirot Research and Development Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(10), 145–160. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/swurd/article/view/32257 [in Thai]
Siha, P. (2016). Political conflict and the 2014 coup d’état [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. Chula Digital Collections. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/chulaetd/51910/ [in Thai]
Student protests in Ubon Ratchathani and Chiang Mai echo Free Youth’s demands. (2020, July 20). Prachathai English. https://prachataienglish.com/node/8664
Taweesak, S. (2017, May 3). Liberating Buddhism from the state. Matichon. https://www.matichon.co.th/weekly/deep/article_33842 [in Thai]
Thai Enquirer. (2020, October 18). At Chiang Mai University, more and more people are entering the area to join the planned protest. Not even time and almost a thousand here now [Image attached] [Status update]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/ThaiEnquirer/posts/at-chiang-mai-university-more-and-more-people-are-entering-the-area-to-join-the-/202673014553573/
Thai Lawyers for Human Rights. (2020, November 10). Before 14 October: Overview of harassment of individuals by authorities following Free Youth’s protest: Statistics of 18 July to 10 October 2020. https://tlhr2014.com/en/archives/23028
Thai Tham Philosophy Group. (n.d.). Consequentialism / Teleology: Ethical theories emphasizing the consequences of actions. In Concise Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://www.parst.or.th/philospedia/consequentialism.html [in Thai]
Thanasathit, U. (2013). Ethics of politicians. Journal of Moral and Virtue, 2(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.14456/jmv.2013.5 [in Thai]
Will, L. (2020, September 28). Student led protests roaring in Chiang Mai. Chiang Mai Citylife. https://www.chiangmaicitylife.com/clg/our-city/city-issues/student-led-protests-roaring-in-chiang-mai/
Wongyannava, T. (2016). The rationality of legitimacy (domination) (2nd ed.). Sommadhi Publishing House. [in Thai]