Broken rung roles in the female leadership deficit phenomenon in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The underrepresentation of women in top management positions is marked by a decline in participation as the hierarchy rises. This study investigates the impact of the "broken rung" phenomenon—referring to unfair promotion systems as a key barrier to female career advancement—on the leadership deficit among women in Indonesia. Using a qualitative methodology and a phenomenological approach, data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews. The research analysis followed four stages of coding: open coding, axial coding, selective coding, and process coding. Findings reveal that gender stereotypes in certain industries and occupations contribute to the scarcity of female leaders. The shortage of female leaders initially stems from the limited presence of women in specific industries, influenced by these stereotypes. The "broken rung" is not the primary factor in Indonesia’s female leadership deficit, as there were already few women in specific sectors before unfair company systems impacted them. The root cause is not an unfriendly promotion system, but rather the unequal distribution of female workers across industries. Feminine-dominated sectors see higher female representation, while masculine-dominated sectors do not. Unfortunately, a significant portion of jobs are perceived as masculine, leading to an overrepresentation of male-dominated industries.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All rights reserved. Apart from citations for the purposes of research, private study, or criticism and review,no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any other form without prior written permission by the publisher.
References
Adachi, T. (2013). Occupational gender stereotypes: Is the ratio of women to men a powerful determinant? Psychological Reports, 112(2), 640–650. https://doi.org/10.2466/17.07.PR0.112.2.640-650
Anker, R., Melkas, H., & Korten, A. (2003). Gender-based occupational segregation in the 1990s (WP.16). Bureau of Statistics, International Labour Office.
Arquisola, M. J., Zutshi, A., Rentschler, R., & Billsberry, J. (2020). Academic leaders’ double bind: Challenges from an Indonesian perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(2), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2018-0328
Badan Pusat Statistik [Statistics Indonesia]. (2023). Indeks Ketimpangan Gender 2022 (No. 54/08/Th. XXVI) [Gender Disparity Index 2022]. Berita Resmi Statistik. [in Indonesian]
Boonla, D., & Treputtharat, S. (2014). The Relationship between the leadership style and school effectiveness in school under the office of secondary education area 20. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112(ICEEPSY 2013), 991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1260
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2011). Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism. Sex Roles, 64(9), 768–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9987-3
Carless, S. A. (1998). Gender differences in transformational leadership: An examination of superior, leader, and subordinate perspectives. Sex Roles, 39(11–12), 887–902. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018880706172
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Desvaux, G., Devillard, S., Zelicourt, A., Kossoff, C., Labaye, E., & Sancier-Sultan, S. (2017). Women matter: Time to accelerate - Ten years of insights on gender diversity. McKinsey & Company.
Dowling, G. (2017). The glass ceiling: Fact or a misguided metaphor? Annals in Social Responsibility, 3(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/asr-05-2017-0002
Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. The American Psychologist, 52(12), 1380–1383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1380.b
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the Emergence of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 685–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.685
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22.
Edirisinghe, C. L., & Udayangani, T. K. (2016). Investigation of barriers on glass ceiling effect among female executive employees in a selected large apparel industry in Sri Lanka. Advances in Economics and Business Management, 3(3), 291–296. http://www.krishisanskriti.org/Publication.html
Fetterolf, J. C., & Eagly, A. H. (2011). Do young women expect gender equality in their future lives? An Answer from a possible selves experiment. Sex Roles, 65(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9981-9
Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32(9–10), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544212
Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509653.pdf
Huang, J., Krivkovich, A., Starikova, I., Yee, L., & Zanoschi, D. (2019). Women in the workplace 2019. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured%20Insights/Gender%20Equality/Women%20in%20the%20Workplace%202019/Women-in-the-workplace-2019.ashx
Innayah, M. N., & Pratama, B. C. (2019). Tantangan dan Kesempatan Wanita Dalam Lingkungan Kerja [Challenges and opportunities for women in the work environment]. Jurnal Manajemen, 13(2), 8–15. [in Indonesian]
Jayachandran, S. (2021). Social norms as a barrier to women’s employment in developing countries. IMF Economic Review, 69(3), 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-021-00140-w
Kiaye, R. E., & Singh, A. M. (2013). The glass ceiling: A perspective of women working in Durban. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 28(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411311301556
Kinanti, N. A., Syaebani, M. I., & Primadini, D. V. (2021). Stereotip Pekerjaan Berbasis Gender Dalam Konteks Indonesia [Gender-based job stereotypes in the Indonesian Context]. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Usahawan Indonesia, 44(1), 1–16. [in Indonesian]
Kulik, L. (1999). The impact of evaluation procedure on occupational sex-typing at different educational levels. Journal of Career Assessment, 7(4), 415–427.
Kuruppuarachchi, K. A. P. S. T., & Surangi, H. A. K. N. S. (2019). The glass ceiling and women career advancement: A study based on ready – Made garment industry in Sri Lanka. Kelaniya Journal of Management, 8(2), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.4038/kjm.v8i2.7581
Lathabhavan, R., & Balasubramanian, S. A. (2017). Glass ceiling and women employees in Asian organizations: A tri-decadal review. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 9(3), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-03-2017-0023
Mainiero, L. A., & Sullivan, S. E. (2005). Kaleidoscope careers: An alternate explanation for the “opt-out” revolution. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 106–123. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2005.15841962
McKinsey & Company. (2018). The power of parity: Advancing women’s equality in Asia Pacific. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/gender-equality/the-power-of-parity-advancing-womens-equality-in-asia-pacific
Moreno-Gómez, J., Lafuente, E., & Vaillant, Y. (2018). Gender diversity in the board, women’s leadership and business performance. Gender in Management, 33(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-05-2017-0058
Nixdorff, J. L., & Rosen, T. H. (2010). The glass ceiling women face: An examination and proposals for development of future women entrepreneurs. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/NEJE-13-02-2010-B006
Powell, G. N. (2000). The glass ceiling: Explaining the good and bad news. In M. J. Davidson & R. J. Burke (Eds.), Women in management current research issues volume II (pp. 236–249). Sage Publications.
Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (2015). The glass ceiling: What have we learned 20 years on? Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 2(4), 306–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-09-2015-0032
Puspitawati, H. (2012). Konsep, teori dan analisis gender [Concept, theory and gender analysis]. In H. Puspitawati (Ed.), Gender dan Keluarga: Konsep dan Realitas di Indonesia (Vol. 4, pp. 1–13). IPB Press. [in Indonesian]
Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press.
Ritter, B. A., & Yoder, J. D. (2004). Gender differences in leader emergence persist even for dominant women: An updated confirmation of role congruity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(3), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00135.x
Salazar, L., & Moline, A. (2023). Increasing women’s representation in business leadership (Report No. 182632). World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39870
Saleem, S., Rafiq, A., & Yusaf, S. (2017). Investigating the glass ceiling phenomenon: An empirical study of glass ceiling’s effects on selection-promotion and female effectiveness. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 6(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-04-2016-0028
Sidani, Y. M., Konrad, A., & Karam, C. M. (2015). From female leadership advantage to female leadership deficit: A developing country perspective. Career Development International, 20(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2014-0009
Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group and Organization Management, 36(2), 223–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111401017
Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Sage Publications.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 699–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699