Driving a three-age learning curriculum from local wisdom under the “YANGKHINOK Model” in Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study had the objective of developing a three-age learning curriculum from local wisdom under the YANGKHINOK Model which focuses on time, resources, knowledge, skills, and sincerity to enhance competency and leverage social networks in Khueang Nai District, Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand. Due to the dynamics of global society influencing Thai education, integrating local wisdom in curriculum development is essential for preserving cultural heritage and community sustainability. A mixed method of qualitative case studies and quantitative evaluation was employed to assess the efficacy of the local wisdom project. Key findings spotlighted the importance of community participation, educational coordination, and the appropriate development of a curriculum for all age groups by the YANGKHINOK Model (Youth, Adult, Narration, Gathering, Knowledge, Hearkening, Impetus, Network, Older Persons, Keeping). This inclusive approach emphasizes the critical role of collaboration among local communities and educational institutions to ensure that the curriculum remains relevant and adaptable across different generations. The approach also aims to create a contemporary democratic society by promoting continuous learning and sustainable professional development that fosters long-term community resilience. It was concluded that a sustainable community curriculum must include these components to meet the actual needs of the community, as well as being adaptable to social and economic changes. Effective use of limited local resources, strategic planning, and broad participation for practical results lead to lasting sustainability, providing a framework for continuous community improvement.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All rights reserved. Apart from citations for the purposes of research, private study, or criticism and review,no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any other form without prior written permission by the publisher.
References
Adhikari, Y. (2020). Teachers’ participation in the curriculum development process in Nepal: A study from teachers’ perspectives. Artech Journal of Art and Social Sciences, 2(4), 83–93.
Albilehi, R., Han, J. Y., & Desmidt, H. (2013). Curriculum development 101: Lessons learned from a curriculum-design project. The CATESOL Journal, 24(1), 187–197.
Bans-Akutey, A., & Tiimub, B. M. (2021). Triangulation in research. Academic Letters, Article 3392. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3392
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implantation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Bekhet, A. K., & Zauszniewski, J. A. (2012). Methodological triangulation: An approach to understanding data. Nurse Researcher, 20(2), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.40.c9442
Brennan, M., & Widdop, Q. H. (2020). An ethical re-framing of curriculum for sustainability education. Curriculum Perspectives, 40(1), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-019-00095-z
Chartofili, A., & Fokides, E. (2019). Teaching local history, culture, traditions, and customs using digital games: Preliminary results from a case study in the island of Nisyros. Open Journal for Educational Research, 3(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0302.04081c
Goussous, J. (2022). Preservation of cultural heritage sites: Methodology and application in case studies. ASTRA Salvensis, 10(1), 245–263.
Gwilliam, J. (2021). Environmental sustainability of learning and teaching. European University Association.
Hartnett, M. (2012). Relationships between online motivation, participation, and achievement: More complex than you might think. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 16(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.61468/jofdl.v16i1.90
Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Sánchez-Santamaría, J., Pérez-Pueyo, A., & Abella-García, V. (2019). Social networks to promote motivation and learning in higher education from the students’ perspective. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 56(4), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1579665
Kokanuch, A. (2019). The activity model to generate income for the elderly by citizen participation in the Yangkeenok sub-district administrative office, Khueang Nai district, Ubonratchathani province. Loei Rajabhat University.
Konecki, K. T. (2008). Triangulation and dealing with the realness of qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 4(3), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.3.02
Kotbantao, S. (2010). Curriculum development and implementation. Panyachon.
Mattiev, I. B. (2022). The importance of setting goals and objectives in the classroom, students’ worldview and method of setting learning objectives. European Scholar Journal, 3(2), 46–49.
Matzhanova, I., Simtikov, Z., Kairbekova, A., & Matzhanova, K. (2021). Stratification of youth employment and departure abroad with the purpose of work: Kazakhstan and neighboring countries. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(3), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/792
Maulana, R., & Helms-Lorenz, M. (2016). Observations and student perceptions of the quality of preservice teachers’ teaching behavior: Construct representation and predictive quality. Learning Environments Research, 19, 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9215-8
McMillan, M., Little, P., Conway, J., & Solman, A. (2019). Curriculum design and implementation resources, processes and results. Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.24313/jpbl.2019.00178
Moeller, A. J., Theiler, J. M., & Wu, C. (2012). Goal setting and student achievement: A longitudinal study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01231.x
Mpuangnan, K. N., & Ntombela, S. (2024). Community voice in curriculum development. Curriculum Perspectives, 44, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-023-00223-w
Nyabero, C. (2016). Toward a collective approach to course evaluation in curriculum development, contemporary perspective. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35), 60–64.
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills education 2030. OECD Publishing.
Omolewa, M. (2007). Traditional African modes of education: Their relevance in the modern world. International Review of Education, 53, 593–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-007-9060-1
Pamenang, F. D. N. (2021). Local wisdom in learning as an effort to increase cultural knowledge: Students’ perception as prospective teachers. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 5(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v5i1.3050
Retnowati, R., Istiana, R., & Nadiroh, N. (2020). Developing project-based learning related to local wisdom in improving students’ problem-solving skills. Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning, 5(1), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v5i1.1035
Rocco, M. L., & Priest, K. L. (2023). Extending the scope of leaderships identity development. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2023(178), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20559
Saepudin, A., & Mulyono, D. (2019). Community education in community development. Journal Empowerment, 8(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.22460/empowerment.v8i1p65-73.1165
Saylor, J. G., Alexander, W. M., & Lewis, A. J. (1981). Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Smith, T. A. (2011). Local knowledge in development (Geography). Geography Compass, 5(8), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00443.x
Steverink, N., Lindenberg, S., Spiegel, T., & Nieboer, A. P. (2020). The associations of different social needs with psychological strength and subjective well-being: An empirical investigation based on social production function theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 799–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00107-9
Stuer, D., De Vos, A., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Akkermans, J. (2019). A sustainable career perspective of work ability: The importance of resources across the lifespan. International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, 16(14), Article 2572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142572
Swaminathan, R. (2007). Educating for the “real world”: The hidden curriculum of community service-learning. Equity and Excellence in Education, 40(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680701246450
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Ucar, H., & Goksel, N. (2020). Enhancing online EFL learners’ motivation and engagement through supplementary activities on Facebook. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3881576
United Nations. (2018). The 2030 Agenda and the sustainable development goals: An opportunity for Latin America and the Caribbean (LC/G.2681-P/Rev.3). United Nations.
Vinish, P., Pinto, P., & D’Souza, R. (2022). Framework for identification of curriculum gaps: A systematic approach. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(Special Issue), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is1/22009
Winston, N. (2021). Sustainable community development: Integrating social and environmental sustainability for sustainable housing and communities. Sustainable Development, 30(1), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2238