Genealogy of reproduction: The governing of wombs in the nation of Vietnam

Main Article Content

Thouchanok Sattayavinit

Abstract

In Vietnam, the governing of women’s wombs has undergone multiple transformations that are contingent upon the particular disciplining power of the time. The technology of biopower is employed by the modern state to directly target and control human bodies as subjects of the state. It is centrally exercised over the human body, which disciplines and regulates them into social bodies. In the 19th century, the French colonial government advanced pronatalism as one of their main governing ideologies. Pronatalism encouraged women to procreate in order to increase the population (i.e. labor supply) at the same time that capitalism was beginning to emerge in the region. In opposition to this, the anti-colonial and socialist Vietnamese government disputed the colonial policy of pronatalism, instead encouraging family planning and birth control. This controversial ideology is significant in seeking to understand the tactics applied by the Democratic Republic of Vietnam against French colonial authorities and their stance on reproduction. Following this, communism would become the main ideology of Vietnam, further shifting the trajectory of governing reproduction, for instance in the case of the legalization of abortion. When the state is able to influence the population in these ways, women’s wombs become part of the nation-building process, in which the state apparatus is able to manipulate the population according to the “needs of the nation.” Consequently, women’s bodies become marked with traces of bodily and reproductive governance. Applying the genealogical method, this article will investigate the history of reproduction in Vietnam from the French colonial era to the arrival of socialism. Therefore, the article aims to reveal the disciplining power that governs women’s bodies as well as the power relations existent between them. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Andersen, M. C. (2015). Regeneration through empire: French pronatalists and colonial settlement in the third republic. University of Nebraska Press.

Beresford, M. (1990). Vietnam: Politics, economics, and society. Pinter.

Bradford, H. (2015). Abortion is communism: A genealogy of "abortion culture" [Master’s thesis, Minnesota State University-Mankato]. Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato.

Bryant, J. (1998). Communism, poverty, and demographic change in north Vietnam. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 235–269.

Bửu-Đề. (1932, July 28). Sản dục hiệp tình hay là sản dục hạn chế [Sympathetic sexual reproduction or reproductive and sexual control?]. Phụ Nữ Tân Văn, 11. http://baochi.nlv.gov.vn/baochi/cgi-bin/baochi?a=d&d=HtCq19320728.2.9&e=-------vi-20--1--img-txIN-h%E1%BA%A1n++ch%E1%BA%BF+d%E1%BB%A5c+t%C3%ACnh-----.

Cameron, L. (2009). Healthcare choices in the context of reform: Perspectives of lives caregivers in Vietnam. [Master’s thesis, University of Oxford]. Green-Templeton College Research Repository. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08b5de5274a27b2000ae1/Cameron_MScDissertation_Aug2009.pdf.

Chesneaux, J., & Tinker, M. (1969). The historical background of Vietnamese communism. Government and Opposition, 4(1), 118–135.

Chung, N. V. (2020, June 17). Đại biểu quốc hội: Hành vi bức tử thai nhi là vô đạo đức, cần xử lý nghiêm [National assembly deputies: The act of forcing the fetus to die is immoral, it needs to be dealt with severely]. Lao Động. https://laodong.vn/xa-hoi/dai-bieu-quoc-hoi-hanh-vi-buc-tu-thai-nhi-la-vo-dao-duc-can-xu-ly-nghiem-813234.ldo

Coughlin, R. J. (1965). Pregnancy and birth in Vietnam. In D. V. Hart, Phya, Anuman Rajadhon, & R. J. Coughlin (Eds.), Southeast Asian birth customs: Three studies in human reproduction (pp. 205–259). Human relations Area Files.

Duiker, W. J. (1977). Ideology and nation-building in the democratic republic of Vietnam. Asian Survey, 17(5): 413–431.

Duyên-Hồng. (1933, August 15). Cầu đa đinh [Bridge of having many sons]. Khoa Học. 7. http://baochi.nlv.gov.vn/baochi/cgi-bin/baochi?a=d&d=Hueo19330815.1.9&srpos=20&e=------193-vi-20--1--img-txIN-C%E1%BA%A7u+%C4%91a+%C4%91inh+-----#

Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press.

Foucault, M. (1977). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 139–164). Cornell University Press.

Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality volume 1: The will to knowledge. Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1997). The birth of biopolitics. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics, subjectivity, and truth (pp. 73–79). The New Press.

Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. Picador.

Gammeltoft, T. (1999). Women’s bodies, women worries: Health and family planning in a Vietnamese rural community. Curzon.

Gammeltoft, T. (2002). The irony of sexual agency: Premarital sex in urban northern Việt Nam. In J. Werner & D. Belanger (Eds.), Gender, household, state: Đổi mới in Việt Nam (pp.111–128). Cornell University Press.

Gammeltoft, T., & Nguyễn, H. T. T. (2007). The commodification of obstetric ultrasound scanning in Hanoi, Viet Nam. Reproductive Health Matters, 15(29), 163–171.

Goodkind, D. M. (1995). Vietnam’s one-or-two-child policy in action. Population and Development Review, 21(1), 85–111.

H.V.T. (1933a, March 1). Những phương hạn-chế dục-tính [Sexual restriction methods]. Khoa Học. http://baochi.nlv.gov.vn/baochi/cgi-bin/baochi?a=d&d=Hueo19330301.2.20&e=-------vi-20--1--img-txIN-Những+Phương+Hạn%252DChế+Dục%252DT%C3%ADnh-----#

H.V.T. (1933b, April 15). Những phương hạn-chế dục-tính [Sexual restriction methods]. Khoa Học. http://baochi.nlv.gov.vn/baochi/cgi-bin/baochi?a=d&d=Hueo19330415.2.17&e=-------vi-20--1--img-txIN-Những+Phương+Hạn%252DChế+Dục%252DT%C3%ADnh-----

Hirschman, C., & Bonaparte, S. (2012). Population and society in Southeast Asia: A historical perspective. In L. Williams & M. P. Guest (Eds.), Demographic change in Southeast Asia: Recent Histories and Future Directions (pp. 1–37). Cornell University, South- East Asia Program.

Johansson, A., Nguyễn, L. T., Hoàng, H. T., Diwan, V. K., & Eriksson, B. (1998). Population policy, son preference and the use of IUDs in north Vietnam. Reproductive Health Matters, 6(11), 66–76.

Jones, G. W. (1995). Population and the family in Southeast Asia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26(1), 184–195.

King, L. (2002). Demographic trends, pronatalism, and nationalist ideologies in the late twentieth century. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25(3), 367–389.

Lê, H. (1895). Traitement de Nguyen Thi Hai, originaire du village de Phuong Canh (Ha Dong), au dispensaire municipal de Hanoi pour son avortement [Nguyễn Thị Hai, a native of the village of Phuong Canh (Hà Đông), Treated at the municipal dispensary of Hanoi for her abortion]. Vietnam National Archives Center 1.

Lê, H. V. (2020, December 16). Sự mất cân bằng sinh ở việt nam và giải pháp điều chỉnh [Birth imbalance and corrective solution in Vietnam]. State Management Review. www.quanlynhanuoc.vn/2020/12/16/su-mat-can-bang-sinh-o-viet-nam-va-giai-phap-dieu-chinh/

Lê, Q. H. (1932, October 27). Bàn thêm vấn đề hạn chế sản dục [Added the reproductive and sexual control problem]. Phụ Nữ Tân Văn. http://baochi.nlv.gov.vn/baochi/cgi-bin/baochi?a=d&d=HtCq19321027.2.6&e=-------vi-20-Hueo-1--img-txIN-Nh%E1%BB%AFng+L%C3%BAc+N%C3%A0o+%C4%90%C3%A0n+B%C3%A0+D%E1%BB%85+Th%E1%BB%A5%252DThai+-----

Lessard, M. R. (2002). Civilizing women: French colonial perceptions of Vietnamese womanhood and motherhood. In T. L. Hunt & M. R. Lessard (Eds.), Women and the colonial gaze (pp. 148–161). Palgrave.

Luangaramsri, P. (2020). Womb of the nation: Disciplining reproduction and the history of the state and women’s sexuality in Thailand. Stance: The Thai Feminist Review, 7(1): 91–130.

Marr, D. G. (1980). Vietnamese anticolonialism 1885–1925. University of California Press.

Marr, D. G. (1981). Vietnamese traditional on trial, 1920–1945. University of California Press.

Ministry of Health. (2020). Quyết định 1807/QĐ-BYT – Về việc ban hành hướng dẫn về chuyên môn kỹ thuật trong sàng lọc, chẩn đoán, điều trị trước sinh và sơ sinh [Decision 1807/QĐ-BYT – On the promulgation of guidelines on technical expertise in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of antenatal and neonatal care]. www.thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/The-thao-Y-te/Quyet-dinh-1807-QD-BYT-2020-chuyen-mon-ky-thuat-sang-loc-chan-doan-dieu-tri-truoc-sinh-so-sinh-440595.aspx

Nguyễn, A. C. (2008). A comparative study of abortion issues in Thailand and Vietnam [Master Degree, Chulalongkorn University]. Chulalongkorn University Research Reposition. www.car.chula.ac.th/display7.php?bib=b1851142.

Nguyễn, H. C. (1988). Women and family planning policies in postwar Vietnam. In D. G. Marr & C. P. White (Eds.), Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in socialist development (pp. 61–74). Cornell University, South- East Asia Program.

Nguyễn, K. G., & Nguyễn, X. Q. (2020, May 5). Vietnam wants young people to marry by 30. Bloomberg. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-05/vietnam-wants-to-put-couples-in-the-mood-for-love-and-babies

Nguyễn, T. L. (1992). Abortion in a Vietnamese perspective. In K. Wijma & B. von Schoultz (Eds.), Reproductive life: Advances in psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology (pp. 158–163). Parthenon Publishing Group.

Nguyễn, T. L. (2010). French-educated midwives and the medicalization of childbirth in colonial Vietnam. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 5(2), 133–182.

Nguyễn, T. L. (2016). Childbirth, maternity, and medical pluralism in French colonial Vietnam 1880–1945. University of Rochester Press.

Nguyễn, T. L. (2018). Overpopulation, racial degeneracy and birth control in French colonial Vietnam. Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1353/cch.2018.0024

Phạm, N. B., Hill, P. S., & Hall, W. (2013). The evolution of population policy in Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 27(2), 61–75.

President of Vietnam. (1950). Sắc lệnh số. 97/SL – Về Việc sửa đổi một số quy lệ và chế định trong dân luật do chủ tịch chính phủ việt nam dân chủ cộng hoà ban hành [Ordinance No. 97/SL – Amending regulations and provision in the civil law issued by the president of the democracy republic of Vietnam]. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Quyen-dan-su/Sac-lenh-97-SL-sua-doi-quy-le-che-dinh-dan-luat-36573.aspx

Prime Minister. (2020). Quyết định 588/QĐ-TTg – Phê duyệt chương trình điều chỉnh mức sinh phù hợp các vùng, đối tượng đến năm 2030 [Decision 588/QĐ-TTg – Approval the program of adjusting birth range appropriating the regions and subjects by 2030]. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Van-hoa-Xa-hoi/Quyet-dinh-588-QD-TTg-2020-Chuong-trinh-dieu-chinh-muc-sinh-phu-hop-cac-vung-doi-tuong-441265.aspx

Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Biopower today. BioSocieties, 1(2), 195–217. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1017/S1745855206040014

Raffin, A. (2008). Postcolonial Vietnam: Hybrid modernity. Postcolonial Studies, 11(3), 329–344. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13688790802226728

Read, G. (2012). Citizens useful to their country and to humanity: The convergence of eugenics and pro-natalism in interwar French politics, 1918–1940. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History, 29(2): 373-397.

Sattayavinit, T. (2020). Kānmư̄ang rư̄ang ʻanāmai charœ̄nphan: Kān pokkhrō̜ng ʻamnāt chīwa khrō̜pkhrūa læ rāngkāi khō̜ng phūying nai rat sangkhomniyom wīatnām [The politics of reproduction: Bio-power, families, and women’s bodies in Vietnam socialist state]. In V. Praphong (Ed.), Khwām (mai) pen ying khwām (mai) pen chāi khwām (mai) pen khon (pp. 1–30). Department of Sociology and Anthropology.

Sjösten, C. (2014). A minor field study on abortion legislation and practice in Vietnam [Master’s thesis, Lund University]. Lund University Research Repository. https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/lup/publication/4392145.

Thạch, B. (1933, June 15). Sản dục hạn chế [Reproductive and sexual control]. Khoa Học, 18. http://baochi.nlv.gov.vn/baochi/cgi-bin/baochi?a=d&d=Hueo19330615.2.20&e=-------vi-20--1--img-txIN-Những+Phương+Hạn%252DChế+Dục%252DT%C3%ADnh-----

Thomas, L. M. (2003). Politics of the womb: Women, reproduction, and the state in Kenya. University of California Press.

UNFPA & Ministry of Health-Vietnam. (2017). Study on the quality of family planning services in Viet Nam. UNFPA.

Vĩnh, T. (2014, December 29). Văn bản pháp quy đầu tiên của nhà nước về công tác dân số [The first decision of the state population]. Gia Đình. https://giadinh.suckhoedoisong.vn/van-ban-phap-quy-dau-tien-cua-nha-nuoc-ve-cong-tac-dan-so-172141227101759703.htm

Vũ, Q. N. (1994). Fammily planning programme in Vietnam. Vietnam Social Sciences, 39, 3–20.

Werner, J. (2018). Gender, household, and state: Renovation (đối mới) as social process in Việt Nam. In J. Werner & D. Bélanger (Eds.), Gender, household, state (pp. 29–48). Cornell University.

Winichakul, T. (1991). Rāingān khrōngkān wičhai sœ̄m laksūt rư̄ang withīkān sưksā prawattisāt bǣp wongsā witthayā [Genealogy]. Unpublished manuscript.

Wisensale, S. K. (2000). Family policy in a changing Vietnam. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31(1), 79–90.

Y sỹ B. (1934, October 15). Những lúc nào đàn bà dễ thụ-Thai [When women are easily pregnant]. Khoa Học, 17. http://baochi.nlv.gov.vn/baochi/cgi-bin/baochi?a=d&d=Hueo19341115.2.16&e=-------vi-20--1--img-txIN-Những+Phương+Hạn%252DChế+Dục%252DT%C3%ADnh-----