Mindfulness practice experiences of individuals with a high connectedness with nature

Main Article Content

Teerawan Teerapong
Proetphan Daensilp
Benjamin Weinstein

Abstract

The environmental and climate crises unfolding around the globe have made understanding what motivates people to be more ecologically aware and practice conservation more important than ever. This qualitative study explored the experience of the mindfulness development practices among people (N=10) demonstrating a high connectedness with nature. It used a phenomenological method of data collection through in-depth interviews. The findings of this study reveal three main themes concerning experiences of mindfulness practice among the informants. The first theme is the informant’s pathway of mindfulness practice. The second theme is concerned with how each informant came to understand the meaning of mindfulness. This factor can be further divided into six sub-themes: (1) do, learn and see it myself; (2) practice with coaching; (3) “I” and my thoughts are not the same thing; (4) practice letting go bit by bit; (5) mindfulness is vital; and (6) improved quality of life through mindfulness (e.g., mentality, relationships, and work performance). The last main theme addresses three attributes of connectedness with nature that have been improved via continual mindfulness practice, including: (1) awareness that connection with nature and mindfulness practice are one; (2) awareness that inner and outer worlds are connected as one; and (3) being careful not to do anything that can harm nature. People who are concerned about conservation of natural resources are advised to study and develop methods of mindfulness practice that are suitable for public distribution for the future care and healing of nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Amel, E. L., Manning, C. M. and Scott, B. A. (2009). Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing green behavior. Ecopsychology 1: 14-25.

Barbaro, N. and Pickett, S. M. (2016). Mindfully green: examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences 93: 137-142.

Capaldi, C. A., Passmore, H. A., Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M. and Dopko, R. L. (2015). Flourishing in nature: a review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing 5(4): 1-16.

Chaichantipyuth, P. (2011). The Effect of Buddhist-Ecotherapy Group on Connectedness to Nature and Paññā in Interconnected of University Students. Master’s Thesis in Psychology. Faculty of Psychology: Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. [in Thai]

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design; Choosing among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. California: Sage.

Daensilp, P. (2007). Effects of Yonisomanasikāra Group Counseling on Paññā in Interconnectedness and Change. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation in Psychology. Faculty of Psychology: Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. [in Thai]

Dinona, F. (2009). Clinical Handbook of Mindfulness. New York: Springer.

Ericson, T., Kjønstad, B. G. and Barstad, A. (2014). Mindfulness and sustainability. Ecological Economics 104: 73-79.

Frantz, C., Mayer, F. S., Norton, C. and Rock, M. (2005). There is no ‘‘I’’ in nature: the influence of self-awareness on connectedness to nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25(4): 427-436.

Hanh, T. N. (2013). The World We Have, translated by P. S. Lāsūsō̜. Nakhon Ratchasima: Thai Plum Village. (Original work published 2004) [in Thai]

Harding, S. (2013). Animate Earth: Science, Intuition and Gaia, translated by K. Dīprawat. Bangkok: Sūan Ngœ̄n Mī Mā. (Original work published 2006) [in Thai]

Huineng, D. (2004). The Sutra of Weilang, translated by B. Bhikkhu. Bangkok: Sukkhapabjai. (Original work published 1985) [in Thai]

Kumar, S. (2013). Earth Pilgrim, translated by A. Phlœ̄nphrưksā. Bangkok: Sūan Ngœ̄n Mī Mā. (Original work published 2009) [in Thai]

Mayer, S. F. and Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(4): 503-515.

Peijsel, C., Teerapong, T. and Kreausukon, P. (2015). The effects of mindfulness practice on happiness. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 41(1): 167-180.

Phra Phrom Khunāphō̜n. (2006). Buddhadhamma, Revised and Expanded Edition. 11th ed. Bangkok: Sahathanmik. [in Thai]

Pierce, G. (2003). Ecotherapy. In Health Counseling Application and Theory, edited by J. Donnelly, Canada: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Roszak, T., Gomes, M. E. and Kanner, A. D. (1995). Ecopsychology. Berkeley: Counterpoint.

Santinan. (2009). The First Year of Mind Observation. 3rd ed. Bangkok: Howfar. [in Thai]

Smith, D. B. (2010). Is There an Ecological Unconscious? [Online URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/magazine/31ecopsych-t.html] accessed on May 25, 2019.

Smith, J. A. (2003). Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage.

Somdet Phra Buddhakosajarn. (2017). Buddhadhamma, Extended Edition, 49th ed. Bangkok: Sahathanmik. [in Thai]

Unsworth, S., Palicki, S. and Lustig, J. (2016). The impact of mindful meditation in nature on self-nature interconnectedness. Mindfulness 7(5): 1052-1060.

Zylstra, M. J., Knight, R. T., Esler, K. J. and Lesley, L. L. (2014). Connectedness as a core conservation concern: an interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Science Reviews 2(1-2): 119-143.