Impact of posting Narcissistic Facebook statuses on impression formation and coworking desirability

Main Article Content

Yokfah Isaranon

Abstract

Individuals currently have the ability to form positive impressions of themselves through status updates on Facebook. However, little is known about the influence of self-descriptions on Facebook statuses on peer perception, especially when narcissistic contents are included. This study aimed to examine the impact of posting narcissistic Facebook statuses on impression formation. Specifically, it attempted to explore how types of narcissistic self-descriptions on Facebook affected perceived warmth, competence, likability, and coworking desirability. Using an experimental research design, 201 Thai participants (aged 18-35 years) were randomly assigned to look through one of five imitation Facebook profiles and rate the target person. The results supported the hypothesis that the target who posted an agentic narcissistic Facebook status with self-oriented tactics was rated to have lower degrees of warmth than those who posted communal narcissistic statuses with other-oriented tactics and nonnarcissistic Facebook statuses. However, posting both agentic and communal narcissistic self-descriptions on Facebook reduced likability and coworking desirability. Findings from this research contribute to the literature on social media behaviors and the drawbacks of Facebook posting by highlighting that bragging on Facebook via status updates, even in another-oriented manner, could result in negative social judgment. This study has implications for raising awareness about the harmfulness of posting boastful statuses on Facebook.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Abele, A. E. and Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “big two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47: 935-948.

Abele, A. E. and Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93: 751-763.

Apiwattanodom, K., Supniti, C., Anusornthanawat, R. and Isaranon, Y. (2018). The effects of types of Facebook statuses of a poster on perceived warmth and competence of reader towards the poster. Paper presented at Thailand National Conference on Psychology 2018, Bangkok, Thailand. July 6.

Aslam, S. (2019). Facebook by the Numbers: Stats, Demographics and Fun Facts. [Online URL: https://
www.omnicoreagency.com/facebook-statistics/] accessed on November 30, 2019.

Bakan, D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence: Isolation and Communion in Western Man. Boston: Beacon Press.

Barry, C. T., Lui, J. H., Lee‐Rowland, L. M. and Moran, E. V. (2017). Adolescent communal narcissism and peer perceptions. Journal of Personality 85(6): 782-792.

Bergmann, K., Eyssel, F. and Kopp, S. (2012). A second chance to make a first impression? How appearance and nonverbal behavior affect perceived warmth and competence of virtual agents over time, In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, edited by Nakano, Y., Neff, M., Paiva, A., Walker, M, pp. 126-138. Berlin: Springer.

Biesanz, J. C. and Human, L. J. (2010). The cost of forming more accurate impressions: accuracy-motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively than perceivers without an explicit goal. Psychological Science 21(4): 589-594.

Buss, D. M. (1990). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: an analysis of the negative components of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles 22(9-10): 555-568.

Campbell, W. K., Brunell, A. B. and Finkel, E. J. (2006). Narcissism, interpersonal self-regulation, and romantic relationships: an agency model approach. In Self and Relationships: Connecting Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Processes, edited by K. D. Vohs and E. J. Finkel, pp. 57-83. New York: Guilford Press.

Capozzi, F., Human, L. and Ristic, J. (2019). Attention promotes accurate impression formation. Journal of Personality 88(3): 1-11.

Carlson, E. N., Naumann, L. P. and Vazire, S. (2011). Getting to know a narcissist inside and out. In The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Findings, and Treatments, edited by W. K. Campbell and J. D. Miller, pp. 285-299. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T. and Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: the stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40: 61-149.

Davenport, S. W., Bergman, S. M., Bergman, J. Z. and Fearrington, M. E. (2014). Twitter versus Facebook: exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior 32: 212-220.

Deters, F. G. and Mehl, M. R. (2013). Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? an online social networking experiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science 4(5): 579-586.

Ellison, N., Heino, R. and Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(2): 415-441.

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C. and Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(2): 77-83.

Forest, A. L. and Wood, J. V. (2012). When social networking is not working: individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science 23(3): 295-302.

Gebauer, J. E. and Sedikides, C. (2018a). Agency and communion in grandiose narcissism. In Agency and Communion in Social Psychology, edited by A. E. Abele and B. Wojciszke, pp. 90-102. London: Routledge.

Gebauer, J. E. and Sedikides, C. (2018b). Communal narcissism: on the theoretical and empirical support for a new form of grandiose narcissism. In The Handbook of Trait Narcissism: Key Advances, Research Methods, and Controversies, edited by A. D. Hermann, A. Brunell and J. Foster, pp. 69-78. New York: Springer.

Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B. and Maio, G. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103(5): 854-878.

Harris, R. B. and Paradice, D. (2007). An investigation of the computer-mediated communication of emotions. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 3(12): 2081-2090.

Jørgensen, Ø., Bäckström, M. and Björklund, F. (2017). Judgments of warmth and competence in a computerized paradigm: little evidence of proposed impression formation asymmetries. PloS One 12(4): e0175210.

Moore, K. and McElroy, J. C. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior 28: 267-274.

Morf, C. C. and Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: a dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry 12(4): 177-196.

Muscanell, N. L., Ewell, P. J. and Wingate, V. S. (2016). “S/He posted that?!” perceptions of topic appropriateness and reactions to status updates on social networking sites. Translational Issues in Psychological Science 2(3): 216-226.

Oleszkiewicz, A. and Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K. (2016). Perceived competence and warmth influence respect, liking and trust in work relations. Polish Psychological Bulletin 47(4): 431-435.

Park, S. W. and Colvin, C. R. (2014). Narcissism and discrepancy between self and friends' perceptions of personality. Journal of Personality 82(4): 278-286.

Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: a mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(5): 1197-1208.

Pelled, A., Zilberstein, T., Tsirulnikov, A., Pick, E., Patkin, Y. and Tal-Or, N. (2017). Textual primacy online: Impression formation based on textual and visual cues in Facebook profiles. American Behavioral Scientist 61(7): 672-687.

Raskin, R. N. and Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports 45(2): 590.

Rentzsch, K. and Gebauer, J. E. (2019). On the popularity of agentic and communal narcissists: the Tit-for-Tat Hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 45(9): 1365-1377.

Rosenthal-Stott, H. S., Dicks, R. E. and Fielding, L. S. (2015). The valence of self-generated (status updates) and other-generated (wall-posts) information determines impression formation on Facebook. PloS One 10(6): 1-12.

Scott, G. G. and Ravenscroft, K. (2017). Bragging on Facebook: the interaction of content source and focus in online impression formation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 20(1): 58-63.

Statista (2019). Leading Countries Based on Number of Facebook Users as of July 2019 (In Millions). [Online URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/268136/top-15-countries-based-on-number-of-facebook-users/] accessed on November 30, 2019.

Winter, S., Neubaum, G., Eimler, S. C., Gordon, V., Theil, J., Herrmann, J. and Kramer, N. C. (2014). Another brick in the Facebook wall – how personality traits relate to the content of status updates. Computers in Human Behavior 34: 194-202.

Westrop, S., Nordmann, E., Bruce, G. and Scott, G. G. (2018). F*c*book: swearing impacts impression formation on social media. [Online URL: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wvcsa] accessed on September 15, 2019.

Wojciszke, B., Abele, A. E. and Baryla, W. (2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology 39(6): 973-990.