Main Article Content
An exploration of the definitions of ‘record’ and ‘archive’ in Thailand identifies not only the lack of integration of records and archives but also the Thai perception of archives as memory and heritage. This perspective determines the role of the National Archives of Thailand (NAT) to acquire, appraise, arrange, preserve, conserve, and provide access to archives in its holding. The law requires that non-current records of Thai public agencies be transferred to NAT and have their historical value appraised. In addition, under the National Archives Act of Thailand B.E. 2556 (A.D. 2013), NAT is required to record significant national events and oral history. The legal authority to manage public records belongs to the public agencies who own them. However, under the Office of the Prime Minister’s Regulations on Records Management B.E. 2526 (A.D. 1983), No.2 B.E. 2548 (A.D. 2005), and No.3 B.E. 2562 (A.D. 2019), their authority to establish and manage records is overseen by the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM). The separation of authority for managing records and archives in Thailand plays a significant role in the functions of NAT. First, to ensure that non-current records are effectively transferred, NAT should collaborate with the OPM to develop guidelines to help Thai public agencies properly implement their record management systems. Second, to claim the records of significant national events and oral history as archives, NAT should develop national standards on how to collect, appraise, arrange, and provide access to them. Finally, the key requirement is that archives be recognised as both non-current records and reliable cultural heritage information in accordance with modern archival theories incorporating two archival paradigms: (1) evidence and (2) memory and heritage.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All rights reserved. Apart from citations for the purposes of research, private study, or criticism and review,no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any other form without prior written permission by the publisher.
Brown, C. (2013) Memory, identity, and the archival paradigm: introduction to the special issue. Archival Science 13(2-3): 85-93.
Cook, T. (1997) What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archivaria 43 (Spring 1997): 17-63. [Online URL: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12175/13184] accessed on June 9, 2020.
Cook, T. (2013) Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science 13(2-3): 95-120.
Duranti, L. (1993) The Archival Body of Knowledge: Archival Theory, Method, and Practice, and Graduate and Continuing Education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 34(1): 8-24.
Flinn, A. (2012) Archives and their communities: Collecting histories, challenging heritage. In Memory, Narrative and Histories: Critical Debates New Trajectories, edited by Dawson, G., pp. 19-35. Brighton: University of Brighton.
Gilliland, A. and McKemmish, S. (2004) Building and Infrastructure for Archival Research. Archival Science 4: 149-197.
Hughes, W. and Hughes, C. (2013) Professionalism and professional institutions in times of change. Building Research and Information 41(1): 28-38.
International Council on Archives - Committee on Descriptive Standards. (1999) Glossary of Terms Associated with the General Rules. General International Standard Archival Description ISAD(G). Ottawa: International Council on Archives.
International Organisation for Standardisation. (2016) Information and documentation-Records management-Part 1: Concepts and principles (ISO Standard No. 15489-1:2016). [Online URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/62542.html] accessed on September 23, 2019.
InterPARES 2. (2018) Terminology Database. [Online URL: https://interparestrust.org/terminology] accessed on June 9, 2020.
Kallberg, M. (2012) Archivists - A Profession in Transition? Professions and Professionalism 2(1): 27-41.
Kootiem, S. and Poolsatitiwat, W. (2018) Enforcement of National Archives Act B.E. 2556 regarding Records Transfer: A Case Study on Analysis of The National Library of Thailand, Fine Arts Department. Master’s thesis. Silpakorn University, Thailand. [Online URL: http://ithesis-ir.su.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/2128] accessed on June 9, 2020.
Kormendy, L. (2007) Changes in archives’ philosophy and functions at the turn of the 20th/21st centuries. Archival Science 7(2): 167-177.
Krahan, N. and Poolsatitiwat, W. (2017) Appraisal guidelines for digital image records in the context of Thailand: a case study of The National Archives in Honour of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej. Master’s thesis. Silpakorn University, Thailand. [Online URL: http://ithesis-ir.su.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/1167] accessed on June 9, 2020.
Ministry of Culture, Fine Arts Department, Office of National Archives of Thailand. (2013) National Archives Act of Thailand 2013. [Online URL: https://bit.ly/3ijMl2W] accessed on June 9, 2020.
Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC). (2011) Standard for archivist position according to Civil Service Act B.E. 2551 (2008). [Online URL: https://www.ocsc.go.th/sites/default/files/attachment/job_specification/3-8-002-1.pdf ] accessed on October 1, 2020.
Pearce-Moses, R. (2005) A Glossary of Archival and Records Terminology. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
Poolsatitiwat, W. (2017) Identification of the factors shaping archival education in Thailand and an investigation into the effectiveness of that education in preparing graduates for the archival workplace. Doctoral dissertation. University of Liverpool, UK. doi:10.17638/03007661.
Poolsatitiwat, W. (2019) Records management and Internal Quality Assessment: A case study of higher educational institution in the context of Thailand. Veridian E-Journal Silpakorn University Humanities, Social Sciences and Arts 12(3): 1-20. [Online URL: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Veridian-E-Journal/article/view/17
8263/131830] accessed on June 9, 2020.
Rapeepatchai, P. and Poolsatitiwat, W. (2017) The records management approach of function-based records classification system: a case study of Graduate School (Taling Chan) Silpakorn University. Master’s thesis. Silpakorn University, Thailand. [Online URL: http://ithesis-ir.su.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/1168] accessed on June 9, 2020.
Roe, K. D. (2016) Why Archives? The American Archivists 79(1): 6-13.
Shepherd, E. and Yeo, G. (2003) Managing records: a handbook of principles and practice. London: Facet Publishing.
State of Queensland, Department of Public Works. (2010) Glossary of Archival and Recordkeeping Terms. Queensland: Queensland State Archives.
The Office of the Prime Minister. (2005) The Regulations of the Prime Minister’s Office on Records Management B.E 2526 (1983), and No.2 B.E. 2548 (2005). [Online URL: https://bit.ly/2GR9BrV] accessed on June 9, 2020.
The Office of the Prime Minister. (2019) The Regulations of the Prime Minister’s Office on Records Management No.3 B.E. 2560 (2019). [Online URL: http://www.oap.go.th/images/documents/about-us/regulations/saraban_3-29-12-60.pdf] accessed on June 9, 2020.
Upward, F. (1996) Structuring the records continuum part one: Post custodial principles and properties. Archives and Manuscripts 24(2): 268-285. [Online URL: https://publications.archivists.org.au/index.php/asa/article/view/8583/8577] accessed on June 9, 2020.
Williams, C. (2006) Managing Archives: Foundations, Principles and Practices. Oxford: Candos.
Wongbun, P. and Poolsatitiwat, W. (2018) Guidelines for Selection and Arrangement of Contemporary Historical Records of The National Archives of Thailand: A case study of the collection regarding the Celebration of the 100th Birthday Anniversary of His Holiness Somdet Phra Nyanasamvara the Supreme Patriarch of Thailand on 3 October 2013. Master’s thesis. Silpakorn University, Thailand. [Online URL: http://ithesis-ir.su.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/2127] accessed on June 9, 2020.
Yale, E. (2015) The History of Archives: The State of the Discipline. Book History 18: 332-359.