Main Article Content
The purpose of this study was to investigate the major influencing factors on attitudes of university students in Thailand toward a blended e-learning system (BELS). This study applied a survey method to collect data from 249 students who studied the subject “Computer for Studies and Works” using BELS. The findings confirm that many factors derive from the existing Teaching Acceptance Model (TAM) model and new findings were also discovered as such; (a) learners’ experiences and knowledge required for using BELS can stimulate learners to be more confident to execute all BELS activities; whereas (b) learners’ confidence and experience of using BELS do not lead to learners’ positive or negative feelings of using BELS; (c) the flexibility of BELS did not cause learners to have better control on BELS activities; and (d) the learners seem to believe that BELS is a useful learning tool when they were encouraged by other people. System developers, academic professionals, and other practitioners are anticipated to draw some benefits from these findings in order to develop and implement BELS in a way that helps increase learners’ positive attitude and performance achievement.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All rights reserved. Apart from citations for the purposes of research, private study, or criticism and review,no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any other form without prior written permission by the publisher.
Akkoyunlu, B. and Soylu, M. Y. (2006) A Study on Students’ Views On Blended Learning Environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 7(3): 43-56.
Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P. and Lundqvist, K. (2017) Investigating the Effect of Learning Styles in a Blended E-Learning System: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 33(2): 1-23.
Alharbi, S. and Drew, S. (2014) Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics’ Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 5(1): 143-155.
Ali, H., Ahmed, A. A., Tariq, T. G. and Safdar, H. (2013) Second life (SL) in Education: The Intensions to Use At University of Bahrain. Paper Presented at the Conference on 2013 Fourth International Conference on e-Learning "Best Practices in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards of Excellence and Creativity", Manama, Bahrain. May 7-9. [Online URL: www.bspace.uob.edu.bh: 80/xmlui/handle/123456789/1699] accessed on September 17, 2017.
Aydin, C. C. and Tirkes, G. (2010) Open Source Learning Management Systems in Distance Learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 9(2): 175-184.
Bailey, J. E. and Pearson, S. W. (1983) Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction. Management Science 29(5): 530-545.
Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought & Action, A Social Cognitive Theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bouhnik, D. and Marcus, T. (2006) Interaction in Distance-Learning Courses. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 57(3): 299-305.
Brown, S. J. and Adler, R. P. (2008) Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0. Educause Review 43(1): 16-20.
Chen, Y. C., LIN, Y. C., Yeh, R. C. and LOU, S. J. (2013) Examining Factors Affecting College Students’ Intention to Use Web-Based Instruction Systems: Towards an Integrated Model. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 12(2): 111-121.
Cheng, Y. (2012) Effects of quality antecedents on e‐learning acceptance. Internet Research 22(3): 361-390.
Choi, D. H., Kim, J. and Kim, S. H. (2007) ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(3): 223-243.
Chuo, Y. H., Tsai, C. H., Lan, Y. L. and Tsai, C. S. (2011) The effect of organizational support, self efficacy, and computer anxiety on the usage intention of e-learning system in hospital. African Journal of Business Management 5(14): 5518-5523.
Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davis, F. D. (1985) A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8): 982-1003.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1992) Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22(14): 1111-1132.
DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. (2003) The DeLone and McLean Model
of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4): 9-30.
Escobar-Rodriguez, T. and Monge-Lozano, P. (2012) The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers & Education 58(4): 1085-1093.
Fathema, N., Shannon, D. and Ross, M. (2015) Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Examine Faculty Use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching 11(2): 210-232.
Ferriman, N. (2013) The impact of blended e-learning on undergraduate academic essay writing in English (L2). Computers & Education 60(1): 243-253.
Fidani, A. and Idrizi, F. (2012) Investigating Students’ Acceptance of a Learning Management System in University Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Paper Presented at the Conference on ICT Innovations 2012, Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia. September 12- 15. [Online URL: www.pdfs.semanticscholar.org/92fa/9dce84860 a54cec1d165c6a2a891f6772946.pdf] accessed on September 17, 2017.
Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J. and Renzi, P. (2006) Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers in Human Behavior 22(2): 163-176.
Fry, K. (2001) E-learning markets and providers: some issues and prospects. Education+Training 43(4/5): 233-239.
George, D. and Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Graham, C. R. and Bonk, C. J. (2006) The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W.M. and Tam, K.-Y. (2002) Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(3): 97-124.
Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G. and Higgins, A. (2014) Blended learning: How Teachers Balance the Blend of Online and Classroom Components. Journal of Information Technology Education 13: 121-140.
Johnston, J., Killion, J. and Oomen, J. (2005) Student Satisfaction in the Virtual Classroom. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 3(2): 1-7.
Kanthawongs, P., Suwandee, S., Jabutay, F. A., Chitcharoen, C., Kanthawongs, P. and Limpachot, T. (2016) The Effect of Digital Literacy on Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Scientific and Technical Advancements 2(1): 237-240.
Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Pascot, D. and Bytha, A. (2014) UTAUT Model for Blended Learning: The Role of Gender and Age in the Intention to Use Webinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 10(1): 33-52.
Kinshuk, D. and Yang, A. (2003) Web-based Asynchronous Synchronous Environment for Online Learning. United States Distance Education Association Journal 17(2): 5-17.
Kline, R. B. (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Second Edition). London: Guilford Publications.
Lee, B. C., Yoon, J.O. and Lee, I. (2009) Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education 53(4): 1320-1329.
Lee, L. T. and Hung, J. C. (2015) Effects of blended e-Learning: a case study in higher education tax learning setting. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences 5(1): 1-15.
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K. and Chen, Z. (2005) Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management 42(8): 1095-1104.
Lee, Y. (2006) An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e‐learning system. Online Information Review 30(5): 517-541.
Leflore, D. (2000) Instructional and Cognitive Impacts of Web-Based Education. In Theory Supporting Design Guidelines for Web-Based Instruction, edited by Beverly Abbey, pp. 102-117. PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Liao, C. H. and Huang, W. L. (2009) Community adaptability, computer and internet self-efficacy, and intention of blended e-learning. International Journal of Society Systems Science 1(3): 209-226.
Liaw, S. S. (2008) Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education 51(2): 864-873.
Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D. and Kuo, C. H. (2010) Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers & Education 54(2): 600-610.
Mao, C. and Hu, X. (2013) Teachers’ Use Intention of Multimedia Instruction Resources among Rural Primary Schools in China. Creative Education 4(9): 620-625.
Moore, G. C. and Benbasat, I. (1991) Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3): 192-222.
Osguthorpe, R. T. and Graham, C. R. (2003) Blended Learning Environments: Definitions and Directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(3): 227-33.
Padilla-Meléndez, A., del Aguila-Obra, A. R. and Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013) Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education 63: 306-317.
Palloff, R. M. and Pratt, K. (1999) Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Park, S. Y. (2009) An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 12(3): 150-162.
Pituch, K. A. and Lee, Y. (2006) The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education 47(2): 222-244.
Punnoose, A. (2012) Determinants of Intention to Use eLearning Based on the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 11(1): 301-337.
Rovai, A. P. and Jordan, H. (2004) Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 5(2): 1-13.
Servage, L. (2005) Strategizing for workplace e-learning: some critical considerations. Journal of Workplace Learning 17(5/6): 304-317.
So, H. J. and Brush, T. A. (2008) Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education 51(1): 318-336.
Straub, D., Boudreau, M. C. and Gefen, D. (2004) Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 13(1): 380-427.
Stubbs, M., Martin, I. and Endlar, L. (2006) The structuration of blended learning: putting holistic design principles into practice. British Journal of Educational Technology 37(2): 163-175.
Teo, T. and Noyes, J. (2011) An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education 57(2): 1645-1653.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A. and Howell, J. M. (1991) Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS Quarterly 15(1): 125-143.
Tran, T. and Glowatz, M. (2014) A comparative case study of Irish and Vietnamese students’ eLearning perceptions and acceptance, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services, pp. 44–48. Hanoi: ACM.
Tselios, N., Daskalakis, S. and Papadopoulou, M. (2011) Assessing the Acceptance of a Blended Learning University Course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 14(2): 224-235.
Tuntinakhongul, A. and Muangnakin, P. (2015) Blended E-Learning for Postgraduate Research-Article Writing: A Case Study in One University in Thailand, The International Academic Forum 2016 (IAFOR): Asian Conference on Education 2015, pp. 855 - 872. Kobe: IAFOR.
Venkatesh, V. (1999) Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation. MIS Quarterly 23(2): 239-260.
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (1996) A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences 27(3): 451-481.
Wongwuttiwat, J. and Lawanna, A. (2018) The digital Thailand strategy and the ASEAN community. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 84(3). [Online URL: https://www.onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/isd2.12024] accessed on January 2, 2019.
Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D. and Hsia, T. L. (2010) A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education 55(1): 155-164.
Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., Hsia, T. L. and Liao, Y. W. (2008) Analysis of E-learning innovation and core capability using a hypercube model. Computers in Human Behavior 24(5): 1851-1866.
Yang, Y. T. C., Chuang, Y. C., Li, L. Y. and Tseng, S. S. (2013) A blended learning environment for individualized English listening and speaking integrating critical thinking. Computers & Education 63: 285-305.
Yang, Z. and Liu, Q. (2007) Research and development of web-based virtual online classroom. Computers & Education 48(2): 171-184.
Yuen, A. H. K. (2010) Blended learning in higher education: An exploration of teaching approaches, In S. L. Wong et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 623-630. Putrajaya: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.