Thai Undergraduate Students’ Perception and Production on English Prepositions

Main Article Content

Suwimol Jaiyote

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate Thai undergraduate students’ perception and production on English prepositions: independent and dependent. The participants consisted of 50 English minor students at a university in Thailand.  Research instruments used were a perception test (grammatical judgment) and a production test (writing) adopted from Ruangjaroon (2015). Each item from both tests were parallel. Paired samples t-test was conducted to compare mean score of students’ perception and production on independent and dependent prepositions. Results showed that the students gained higher score on English prepositions on the perception test than they did on the production tests. They also perceived and produced dependent prepositions better than independent prepositions. However, their scores were not very high, which illustrates that they had difficulty in judging and using English prepositions, both independent and independent, correctly.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jaiyote, S. . (2022). Thai Undergraduate Students’ Perception and Production on English Prepositions. Journal of Education Thaksin University, 22(2), 108–118. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/eduthu/article/view/259911
Section
บทความวิจัย

References

Al Khotaba, E. (2013). Errors in the use of prepositions and adverb particles by Arab ESL speakers: Performance analysis perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(1), 273-282.

Atmaca, C. (2016). Error analysis of Turkish EFL learners: A case study. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 234-241.

Castro, M. C. S. A. (2013). An analysis of prepositional errors of college students. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Foreign Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 97-108). Pathum Thani: Thammasat University Press.

Catalan, R. J. (1996). Frequency and variability in errors in the use of English prepositions. Miscelanea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 17, 171-188.

Dalgish, G. (1985). Computer-assisted ESL research and courseware development. Computers and Composition, 2(4), 45-62.

Diab, N. (1997). The transfer of Arabic in the English writings of Lebanese students. The ESPecialist, 18(1), 71-83.

Felix, S. (1991). Universal grammar in L2 acquisition: Some thoughts on Schachter’s incompleteness hypothesis. In L., Eubank, L., Selinker, & M. S., Smith (Eds.), The Current State of Interlanguage (pp. 139-152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Finney, A. M. (2005). Perception of errors in second language syntax: Acquisition or processing difficulties? In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on bilingualism (pp. 751-767). Somerville, MA: CascadillaPress.

Kampookaew, P. (2020). An analysis of grammatical errors made by Thai EFL university students in an EAP writing class: Issues and recommendations. rEFLections, 27(2), 246-273.

Kurk, G., & Atay, D. (2007). Students’ writing apprehension. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 3(1), 12-23.

Latif, M. A. (2007). The factors accounting for the Egyptian EFL university students’ negative writing affect. Language & Linguistics, 9(1), 57-82.

Loke, D. L., Alil, J. & Anthony, N. N. Z. (2013). A corpus-based study on the use of preposition of time ‘on’ and ‘at’ in argumentative essays of form 4 and form 5 Malaysian students. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 128-135.

Phoocharoensil, S., Moore, B., Gampper, C., Geerson, E. B., Chaturongakul, P., Sutharoj, S., & Carlon, W. T. (2016). Grammatical and lexical errors in low-proficiency Thai graduate students’ writing. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network (LEARN) Journal, 9(1), 11-24.

Promsupa, P. (2016). An analysis of grammatical errors in English writing of Thai university students (Master’s thesis, Burapha University, Chonburi). Retrieved from http://lib.buu.ac.th/

Tunaz, M., Muyan, E., & Muratoglu, N. (2016). A corpus-based study on the preposition error types in Turkish EFL learners' essays. International Peer-Reviewed Journal of Humanities and Academic Science, 17, 1-16.

Ruangjaroon, S. (2015). Perception and production of Thai learners on English prepositions. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 71-82.

Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2017). An analysis of errors in written English sentences: A case study of Thai EFL students. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 101-110.

Seyitkuliyev, D., Keyuravong, S., & Bunsom, T. (2020). Investigation of grammatical errors committed by Turkmen learners of English. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Phayao, 8(1), 96-117.

Sumonsriworakun, P., & Pongpairoj, N. (2017). Systematicity of L1 Thai learners’ English interlanguage of dependent prepositions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 246-259.

Suvarnamani, S. (2017). A study of grammatical and lexical errors in descriptive writing of first year arts students at Silapakorn University. Silapakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 17(2), 239-264.

Swan, M. (2005). Practical English usage (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Thong-Iam, N. (2016). English into Thai translation errors of English prepositions and prepositional phrases of Thai undergraduates. Journal of RMUTTO (Humanities and Social Sciences, 5 (2), 1-10.

Thumawongsa, T. (2018). L1 transfer on Thai EFL learners' utilization of prepositions: A corpus-based analysis. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 11(1), 35-47

Tsimpli, I., & Roussou, A. (1991). Parameter-Resetting in L2? UCL Working Paper in Linguistics, 3, 149- 169.

Yaari, S. A. (2013). The Problem of translating the prepositions at, in, and on into Arabic: An applied linguistic approach. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 1(2), 256-273.