Successful Implementation for Thailand as an emerging donor for infrastructure development in GMS


  • Onramon Shuaytong Public and Private Management, National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA).
  • Kasemsarn Chotchakornpant Public Administration, National Institute of Development Administration


Infrastructure Development, Financial Aid, Project Success, the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS)


The objectives of this study were to: (1) study the factors affecting the success of financial
aid under infrastructure development projects in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS), and
(2) propose a model for project implementation success. This study is the qualitative research by
using three research methods in gathering data, consisted of document analysis, semi-structured
interviews, and non-participant observation. The semi-structured interviews were conducted with
34 key informants comprised of 9 key informants from Thai government agencies, 6 key informants
from local administrations, 15 key informants representing the local people, and 4 key informants
from Laos People's Democratic Republic, Kingdom of Cambodia, and Republic of the Union of
Myanmar. All key informants have involved directly in road construction projects.
The study findings from content analysis revealed that government agents defined
success at the outcome level, which consisted of improving quality of life, Sub-region economic
development, and fostering partnerships with neighboring countries. On the other hand, the local
administrations and local people considered success at the output level, which consisted of

reducing travel time and facilitating cross-border trade. The factors affecting the success of financial
aid under infrastructure development projects in GMS consisted of 5 factors: (1) standards and
objectives of policy requirements, (2) involvement and participation among stakeholders,
(3) organization configuration management, (4) the social and political atmosphere, and
(5) harmonization and coordination among stakeholders. The project implementation success
model is presented consistent with evidence found in stakeholders considered success at the
different level which effecting to various success factors. For the policy recommendations, the
government sector should promote constructive relationships with neighboring countries and be
aware of the best interests of neighboring countries. Moreover, the government sector should
develop the foundation of legal, regulations as well as standards agreements under GMS along
with hard infrastructure development.


Download data is not yet available.


Bardach, E. (1977). The Implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes a law (2nd ed.).Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Bhattacharyay, B. N. (2009). Infrastructure development for ASEAN economic integration. ADBI Working Paper 138. Retrieved from
Chen, W. T., Chang, P. Y., & Huang, Y. H. (2010). Assessing the overall performance of value engineering workshops for construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 514-527.
Choi, E. K., & Choi, J. Y. (2007). Infrastructure Aid, Deindustrialization and Urban Unemployment. Staff General Research Papers Archive 12903, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
Hayman, R. (2006). The complexity of aid: Government strategies donor agendas and the coordination of development assistance in Rwanda 1994-2004 (Doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh.
Kanbur, S. R., Sandler, T., & Morrison, K. M. (1999). The future of development assistance: Common pools and international public goods (Vol. 25). Washington DC: Overseas Development Council.
Kuroda, H. (2007). Infrastructure and regional cooperation. ADBI Discussion Paper No. 76. Retrieved from
Lieber, E. (2009). Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Method: Insight into Design and Analysis Issue. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 3(4), 218-227.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1989). Implementation and public policy (2nd ed.). Glenview Ill: Scott Foresman.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland: Or, why it's amazing that Federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Roberts, C.W. (2001) Contentanalysis. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences 9pp.2697-2702). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Rothbauer, P.M. (2008) Triangulation. In L.M. Given (Ed.), The encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp.892-984). New York: Sage
Turner, J. R. (2009). The handbook of project-based management: Leading strategic change in organizations. (3rd ed.). London, U.K.: McGraw-Hill.
Turner, J. R., & Zolin, R. (2012). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 87-99.
United Nations. (2004). Millennium development goals: Status. New York: United Nations, Department of public Information.
Van Meter, D.S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration and Society, 6(4), 445-488.
World Bank. (2016). Annual report. Washington DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA).




How to Cite

Shuaytong, O. ., & Chotchakornpant, K. . (2020). Successful Implementation for Thailand as an emerging donor for infrastructure development in GMS. Journal of Business Administration The Association of Private Higher Education Institutions of Thailand, 9(1), 100–111. Retrieved from



Research Articles