Influence of Knowledge Factors from Organization Support and Employee Self-Support on the Innovation Capabilities in the Thai Automotive Industry: Under the Moderator Variable of Type of Manufacturers.

Authors

  • Poramet Eamurai Graduate School of Business Administration, Southeast Asia University.
  • Napaporn Khantanapha Graduate School of Business Administration, Southeast Asia University
  • Rapeepun Piriyakul Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng University

Keywords:

Organizational Support, Self-support, Innovation Capabilities, Thai Automotive Industry

Abstract

The objectives of this research were (1) to investigate the influence of organizational support
and self-support on the knowledge factors regarding to the innovation capabilities in the Thai
automotive parts manufacturers, Tier 2 and Tier 3; and (2) to compare the innovation capabilities
of the employees working in Tier 2 and Tier 3 automotive parts manufacturers. A quantitative
research was designed while the questionnaire survey was conducted. Employees working in the
Tier 2 and Tier 3 automotive parts manufacturers were targeted as the population of the study.
Two-stage Sampling together with simple random technique was applied to sampling 100 samples
from each tier. Structural equation modeling using the AMOS program was applied to analyze the
data.
The results revealed that (1) the influence of organizational support on knowledge-related
factors of the Tier 2 automotive parts manufacturers on innovation capabilities was higher than
that of the Tier 3 while the influence of self-support on knowledge-related factors of the Tier 3
on innovation capabilities was higher than that of the Tier 2. (2) The positive influence of knowledge
absorption of the Tier 2 on innovation capabilities was higher than that of the Tier 3 while the
influence of knowledge application of the Tier 3 on innovation capabilities was higher than that
of the Tier 2 The knowledge absorption was distinctively illustrated in the Tier 2 while the knowledge
application was more distinctive in the Tier 3 automotive parts manufacturers.

References

Automotive Institute. (2018). Master Plan for Automotive Industry Development 2019-2023. Retrieved from http://www.mfa.go.th/main/contents/files/information-20180618-142227-835103.pdf
Breznik, L., & Hisrich, R. D. (2014). Dynamic capabilities vs. innovation capability: Are they related?. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(3), 368-384.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nded.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation (Special Issue). Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
Department of Industrial Promotion (2018). SMEs Change to Shift. Annual Report 2018 Department of Industrial Promotion, Ministry of Industry.Retrieved from https://www.dip.go.th/uploadcontent/abhimuk/Annual%20Report__2561.pdf
Fonseca, L. M., & Domingues, J. P. (2017). Reliable and flexible Quality Management Systems in the automotive industry: monitor the context and change effectively. Procedia Manufacturing, 11(2017), 1200-1206.
Gregory, J.B., & Levy, P.E. (2010). Employee coaching relationships: enhancing construct clarity and measurement. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 3(2), 109-123.
Gureckis, T. M., & Markant, D. B. (2012). Self-Directed Learning: A Cognitive and Computational Perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 464-481.
Haarhoff, B., Gibson, K., & Flett, R. (2011). Improving the Quality of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Case Conceptualization: The Role of Self-Practice/Self-Reflection. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 39(3), 323–339.
Hagerty, N. (2010). Application of the Academic Motivation Scale to graduate school students. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 6(2), 48-55.
Hair, K. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. (6thed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hiemstra, R., & Burns, J. (1997). Self-Directed Learning: Present and Future. A paper delivered at the First World. Conference on Self-Directed Learning, Montreal, Canada.
Hurley, R. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Knight, G. A. (2005). Innovativeness and capacity to innovate in a complexity of firm-level relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(3), 281–283.
Jonassen, D. H., Cernusca, D., & Ionas, I. G. (2007). Constructivism and instructional design: The emergence of the learning sciences and design research.In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology, (2nd ed., pp. 45-52). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson. Kapur, M.
Kautz, K., & Mahnke, V. (2003). Value Creation through IT-supported Knowledge Management? The Utilisation of a Knowledge Management System in Global Consulting Company. Information Science Journal, 6, 75-88.
Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & Mc Coach, D. B. (2015). The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486-507.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling (2nded.). New York: Guilford Press.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The Myopia of Learning (Special Issue).Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-112.
Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. G. (2006). Effects of socio-technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing. Management Decision, 44(1), 74-88.
Mahnke, V., & Venzin, M. (2003). Governing Knowledge-teams in the MNC: The Case of Heidelberg Cement (Special Issue). Management International Review, 43(3), 47-67.
Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C., & Park, H. J. (2003).MNC Knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), 586-599.
Nair, A. C., Ramalingam, S., & Ravi, A. (2015). Knowledge Creation With in the Automotive Industry. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 7(6), 1-10.
Nybakk, E., Crespell, P., Hansen, E., & Lunnan, A. (2009). Antecedents to Forest Owner Innovativeness: An investigation of the non-timber forest products and services sector. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(2), 608-618.
Rowley, J. E. (2002). Reflections on customer knowledge management in e-business. Qualitative Market Research, 5(4), 258-280.
Ruswanto, T. P., & Saroso, D. S. (2018). Gap Analysis Study on the Compliance of Automotive Standard IATF16949 based on Internal Quality Audit Score in Automotive Industry. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 5(4), 271-285.
Sallis, E., & Jones, G. (2002). Knowledge Management in Education. Enhancing Learning & Education. London: Kogan Page.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Steiner, M., & Hartmann, C. (2006). Organizational learning in clusters: A case study on material and immaterial dimensions of cooperation. Regional Studies, 40(5), 493-506.
Sjoerdsma, M., & van Weele, A. J. (2015). Managing supplier relationships in a new product development context.Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 21(3), 192-203.
Thai Automotive Parts Manufacturers Association (2018). Thailand’s Automotive Industry The Next- Generation. Retrieved from https://www.boi.go.th/index.php?page=brochure
Townley, B. (1993). Performance appraisal and the emergence of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30(2), 221-238.
Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In: B. G. Tabachnick, & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246-260.
Welsch, H., Liao, J., & Stoica, M. (2001).Absorptive capacity and firm responsiveness: An empirical investigation of growth-oriented firms. Proceedings of 2nd USASBE/SBIDA Conference, An Entrepreneurial Odyssey, Orlando, USA.
Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower Bounds on Sample Size in Structural Equation Modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 476-487. DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003
Wutthirong, P. (2015). Innovation management: Resource, learning organization and innovation. Bangkok: Chula press.
Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R. (2005). Why integrating the leading and managing roles is essential for organizational effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 34(4), 361-375.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-15

How to Cite

Eamurai, P. ., Khantanapha, N. ., & Piriyakul, R. (2020). Influence of Knowledge Factors from Organization Support and Employee Self-Support on the Innovation Capabilities in the Thai Automotive Industry: Under the Moderator Variable of Type of Manufacturers. Journal of Business Administration The Association of Private Higher Education Institutions of Thailand, 9(1), 22–43. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/apheitvu/article/view/242855

Issue

Section

Research Articles