About the Journal

Ethics
The journal focuses on maintaining ethical standards in the publication of articles. Therefore, all parties involved are required to strictly adhere to the following ethical principles and standards in publication:
Role of editor and editor
1. Editors and Editors are responsible for reviewing and reviewing all articles submitted for publication in the journal. By considering the consistency of the article content with the goals and scope of the journal. Including article quality checks in the article quality assessment process prior to publication.
2. Editors and editors are required to consider articles based on academic reasons. And there must be no prejudice against authors and articles being considered in any case.
3. Editors and editors must not have interests with authors or experts. Either for the sake of business or for their own academic work.
4. Editors and editors must not block, change or interfere with information exchanged between experts and authors.
5. Editors and editors must strictly follow the journal processes and procedures.

Role of authors
1. The article submitted by the authors for consideration to be published in a journal must be an article that has not been published or published anywhere before.
2. Authors must always make correct references when presenting others' work or citing in their own article content. And must not copy other people's work
3. If the authors' academic work involves the use of animals, participants or volunteers. Or the research results contain vulnerable subjects to informants Authors should act according to ethical principles. Strictly abide by all applicable laws and regulations. Including the need to obtain consent before the data collection or display relevant documents such as a certificate from the Human Research Ethics Committee or in animal testing consists of every time.
4. The authors must agree to transfer the copyright to the journal prior to publication. The work will not be published or published to other sources after it has been published with the journal.
5. The authors' names appearing in the article must be the actual contributors to the article.
Roles and duties of experts to evaluate articles
1. Experts must not have interests with authors. When considering the quality of the article, it is important to consider the quality of the article. And considered on academic principles and reasons without personal prejudice or conflicts
2. A qualified person must recognize that he or she is an expert. Have real knowledge and understanding of the content of the article being evaluated.
3. Experts must not take advantage of the articles they have evaluated.
4. If qualified experts found that the articles to be evaluated As an article plagiarized other works, experts must notify the editor immediately. With clear evidence
5. The qualified person must maintain the evaluation period according to the evaluation time frame set by the journal. Including not disclosing the information of the article to other people to know