READINESS FOR ADAPTATION OF STUDENT TEACHERS AT VALAYA ALONGKORN RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY UNDER THE ROYAL PATRONAGE ACCORDING TO THE BANI WORLD CONCEPT
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to 1) analyze the readiness of student teachers at Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage to adapt according to the BANI World concept, 2) compare the levels of adaptability readiness based on gender, and 3) propose guidelines for developing student teachers to prepare for the BANI World. The sample consisted of 140 student teachers, selected using stratified random sampling. The research instrument was a four-point Likert scale questionnaire with a Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient of .904. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation and t-test for independent samples
The results showed that 1) the overall readiness of student teachers at Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage to adapt to the BANI World concept was at a relatively high level ( = 3.05, SD = .33); 2) there was no significant difference in adaptability readiness based on gender (t = .327, p = .744); and 3) five key guidelines were suggested for preparing student teachers for the BANI World, including: (1) developing adaptability and change management skills, (2) promoting technological and digital learning skills, (3) enhancing collaboration and empathy, (4) fostering creative thinking to design effective teaching approaches, and (5) raising awareness of ethics and social responsibility.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกเรื่องได้รับการตรวจความถูกต้องทางวิชาการโดยผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิ ทรรศนะและข้อคิดเห็นในบทความ Journal of Global of Perspectives in Humanities and Social Sciences (J-GPHSS) มิใช่เป็นทรรศนะและความคิดของผู้จัดทำจึงมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของบัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์ กองบรรณาธิการไม่สงวนสิทธิ์การคัดลอก แต่ให้อ้างอิงแหล่งที่มา
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Cascio, J. (2020). Facing the age of chaos: Lessons from the BANI world. https://medium.com
Ebel, R. L. (1965). Measuring educational achievement. prentice–Hall.
Erkuş, A. (2003). Psikometri üzerine yazılar. Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
Garcia, E. & Weiss, E. (2019). The teacher shortage is real, large, and growing, and worse than we thought. https://www.epi.org/publication/the-teacher-shortage-is-real-large-and-growing-and-worse-than-we-thought-the-first-report-in-the-perfect-storm-in-the-teacher-labor-market-series/
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review. 16(3), 235–266.
Jiracheewewong, E. (2023). Tools for Transforming from VUCA World to BANI World: A Case of Educational Sector in Thailand. STOU Education Journal. 16(2), 1-12.
Kanjanawasi, S. (2013). Classical test theory. 7th ed. Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University.
Mitzkus, S. (2022). BANI world: What is I tand why we need it? Digital leadership. https://digitalleadership.com/blog/bani-world/
Nunnally, J. (1967). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2022). Education in the digital era: guidelines for developing digital skills for students. Office of the Higher Education Commission.
Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.
Tunsook, A. (2022). How to Adapt to the BANI World Era. https://www.coachforgoal.com/home
Ungar, M. (2011). The social ecology of resilience: Addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 81(1), 1–17.
Wright, B. D. & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Mesa Press.
