Right to Be Forgotten on the Internet
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this study were to study and to analyze study and analyze the criteria and guidelines right to be forgotten on the Internet in case of search engines according to Thai and foreign laws. To study problems and guidelines for the protection of personal data, the right to be forgotten on the Internet in Thailand. to explore the suitable model of protection of the right to be forgotten regarding search engines for Thai community. The study was conducted as qualitative research by analyzing law documents such as textbooks, articles, thesis, court verdicts and online information from local and foreign sources. The study found that the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 does not inclusively and clearly specify the right to be forgotten of the data subject on the internet. The Committee does not announce the rules for exercising rights and exemptions for the right to be forgotten on the internet in terms, explicitly. As a result of this, the right to be forgotten could not be fully exercised. For this reason, it is recommended that to announce the rules for exercising rights and exemptions for the right to be forgotten on the internet in terms by explicitly, covering a secondary law. As a guideline for protecting the right to be forgotten on the Internet in case of appropriate in Thailand. This could be the proper guideline for protection of the right to be forgotten on the internet, especially search engine, in Thailand.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author(s) is only responsible for data appearing in the submitted manuscript of Interdisciplinary social sciences and communication journal.Besides, this journal encourages and enables you to share data such as statements, contents, figures, etc. that support your research publication where appropriate, and enables you to interlink the data with proper citation.
References
Alessi, S. (2017). Eternal Sunshine: The Right to Be Forgotten in the European Union after the 2016 General Data Protection Regulation. Emory International Law Review, 32(1), 145-171. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol32/iss1/4
Kantamanee, Y. (2018). Protection of the Right to be Forgotten(Master of Law, Business Law). Thammasat
University.
Leadford, J. L. (2009). Search Engine Optimization Bible(2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Wiley.
Lee, E. (2016). Recognizing Right in Real Time: The Role of Google in the EU Right to be Forgotten. Retrieved
April 10, 2020, from https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/49/3/Articles/49-3_Lee.pdf
Rosen, J. (2010). The Web Means the End of Forgetting. The New York TIMES Magazine. Retrieved April 10,
, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/magazine/25privacy-t2.html
Sangsuvan, K. (2021). The Right to Be Forgotten under the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562. Mae Fah
Luang University Law Journal, 4(1), 13-53
Serirak, N. (2014). Privacy: Thoughts, Knowledge, Truth and Development on Personal Data Protection in
Thailand. Bangkok: P. press.
Verschaeve, S. (2020). Going Dark or Living Forever: The Right to be Forgotten, Search Engines and Press
Archives. SSRN. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3669865
