THINKING ABOUT OPIUM AND THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE: QUESTIONS AND INSIGHTS FROM GLOBAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVES

Authors

  • Aaron Abel T. MALLARI Department of Political Science, University of the Philippines Diliman, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/acsr.2024.19

Keywords:

Golden Triangle, Opium, Global Studies, Southeast Asia, Drug Trade

Abstract

Opium has a complex history. The consumption of opium throughout history ranges from medicinal and ritual practice; to recreational and mass-production proportions. Opium cultivation, consequently, has also undergone shifts from being ‘legal’ to illegal, encouraged to banned. The illicit trade of opium, however, remains to be a global phenomenon. The ebbs and flows of the relationship between this intoxicant and human society, therefore, promise various vantage points to further nuance its complex history not only in terms of related policies, but to more ambitious projects of further thinking about global capitalism, globalization, and global governance. This paper reflects about the Golden Triangle, a region at the heart of mainland Southeast Asia, considered to be one of the major sources of opium in the global drug market. The discussion underscores the value of looking at the Golden Triangle from global studies perspectives. Here, the Golden Triangle is presented as a site of production (pertaining to the site opium poppy cultivation and in a sense pertaining to how it has been produced as a space), interaction (how the Golden Triangle could be seen as a commodity frontier where global capitalism asserts and exerts), negotiation (how the Golden Triangle figures in how ideas and discourses are encountered, contested); and also a window to see local-global dynamics as in the case of Myanmar. These reflections ultimately aim to ask how we can locate illicit commodities and illegal/criminal activities within and from the broader discussions of global studies.

References

Anderson, M., & Holmsten, S. (2019). Political and Economic Foundations in Global Studies. New York: Routledge.

Beckert, S. (2014). Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York: Knopf.

Beckert, S., Bosma, U., Schneider, M., & Vanhaute, E. (2021). Commodity frontiers and the transformation of the global countryside: a research agenda. Journal of Global History, 16(3), 435-450.

Bodetti, A. (2017). War, Drugs, and Peace: Afghanistan and Myanmar. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2017/09/war-drugs-and-peace-afghanistan-and-myanmar/.

Braudel, F. (2023). The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. California: University of California Press.

Chouvy, P. (2021). The Golden Triangle: Regression then Reform?. In A. Idler, & J. Vergara. (eds.). Transforming the War on Drugs: Warriors, Victims and Vulnerable Regions (pp. 229-252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Darian-Smith, E., & McCarty, P. (2017). The Global Turn: Theories, Research Designs, and Methods for Global Studies. California: University of California Press.

Foster, A. (2000). Prohibition as Superiority: Policing Opium in South-East Asia, 1898-1925. The International History Review, 22(2), 253-273.

Gootenberg, P. (2021). Building the Global Drug Regime: Origins and Impact, 1909-1990s. In A. Idler, & J. Vergara. (eds.). Transforming the War on Drugs: Warriors, Victims and Vulnerable Regions (pp. 53-82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grosfoguel, R. (2000). Developmentalism, Modernity, and Dependency Theory in Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(2), 347-374.

Harvey, D. (2001). Globalization and the "Spatial Fix". Geographische Revue, 3(2), 23-30.

Kim, D. (2020). Empires of Vice: The Rise of Opium Prohibition across Southeast Asia. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Kramer, T. (2015). The Current State of Counternarcotics Policy and Drug Reform Debates in Myanmar. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

Kramer, T., Jelsma, M., & Blickman, T. (2009). Withdrawal Symptoms: A Drugs Market in Disarray. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.

Kramer, T., Jensema, E., Jelsma, M., & Blickman, T. (2014). Bouncing Back: Relapse in the Golden Triangle. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.

Lefebvre, H. (1992). The Production of Space. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.

Luong, H. (2022). Paradoxical issues in eradicating opium cultivation in Myanmar: A perspective from local farmers’ voices. Poverty & Public Policy, 14(2), 96-116.

McCarthy, S. (2010). Legitimacy under Military Rule: Burma. Politics & Policy, 38(3), 545-569.

McCoy, A. (2000). From Free Trade to Prohibition: A Critical History of the Modern Asian Opium Trade. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28(1), 307-349.

McCoy, A. (2003). The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade. New York: Laurence Hill Books.

Meehan, P. (2011). Drugs, Insurgency and State-Building in Burma: Why the Drugs Trade Is Central to Burma’s Changing Political Order. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 42(3), 376-404.

Meehan, P. (2015). Fortifying or Fragmenting the State? The Political Economy of the Opium/Heroin Trade in Shan State, Myanmar, 1988-2013. Critical Asian Studies, 47(2), 253-282.

Mignolo, W. (2000). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Mignolo, W. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Mignolo, W., & Escobar, A. (eds.). (2010). Globalization and the Decolonial Option. London: Routledge.

Mignolo, W., & Walsh, C. (2018). On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Moore, J. (2000). Sugar and the Expansion of the Early Modern World-Economy: Commodity Frontiers, Ecological Transformation, and Industrialization. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 23(3), 409-433.

Moore, J. (2003). “The Modern World-System” as Environmental History? Ecology and the Rise of Capitalism. Theory and Society, 32(3), 307-377.

Moore, J. (2015). Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. London: Verso Books.

Moore, J. (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. New York: PM Press.

Moore, J., & Patel, R. (2018). A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things: A Guide to Capitalism, Nature, and the Future of the Planet. California: University of California Press.

Neilson, B. (2000). Unmapping the Golden Triangle or the World on Drugs. Passages, 2(2), 159-185.

Sassaroli, M. (2022). Drugs flow where the rivers meet: Myanmar’s drug economy before and after the coup. In G. Gabusi, & R. Neironi. (eds.). Myanmar After the Coup: Resistance, Resilience, and Reinvention (pp. 96-106). Torino: Torino World Affairs Institute.

Stoddard, E., & Collins, J. (2017). Social and Cultural Foundations in Global Studies. London: Routledge.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). World Drug Report 2020. Retrieved from https://wdr.unodc.org/wdr2020/en/index2020.html.

Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-02

How to Cite

T. MALLARI, A. A. (2024). THINKING ABOUT OPIUM AND THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE: QUESTIONS AND INSIGHTS FROM GLOBAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVES. Asian Crime and Society Review, 11(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.14456/acsr.2024.19