BOEING 737 NEXT GENERATION COMMERCIAL JET AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/acsr.2024.4Keywords:
Commercial Aircraft, Aircraft Accident, Boeing 737 Next Generation, Risk IndicatorAbstract
The Boeing 737 Next Generation series, comprising the 737-600, 737-700, 737-800, and 737-900 models, has been a widely used commercial jet aircraft since its introduction in the late 1990s. Although it is considered one of the most reliable aircraft in its class, it has unfortunately been involved in several accidents over the years. The hull loss aircraft accident concerning the Boeing 737 Next Generation, was statistically evaluated. Modes of aircraft movement indicators were developed and found to have a high relationship with aircraft accidents, and therefore could be considered a good accident risk indicator with R2 higher than 0.8573. This means that the modes of aircraft movement indicators, when used to evaluate the hull loss aircraft accidents involving the Boeing 737 Next Generation, showed a high correlation with the occurrence of accidents. The relationship was found to be strong, with the R2 value being higher than 0.8573. This statistical evaluation suggests that the modes of aircraft movement indicators can be considered as reliable accident risk indicators for the Boeing 737 Next Generation. The high R2 value indicates that these indicators have a strong predictive ability in identifying the potential for accidents to occur.
References
Airbus. (2022). A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2021. Retrieved from https://skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/34487.pdf.
Aviation Safety Network. (n.d.). ASN Aviation Safety Database. Retrieved from www.aviation-safety.net/database/.
Boeing Commercial Airplanes. (2017). Statistics Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accident Worldwide Operation 1959-2016. Retrieved from https://skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/4239.pdf.
Boeing. (n.d.). Boeing Next-Generation 737. Retrieved from www.boeing.com/commercial/737ng/.
Brockwell, P., & Davis, R. (2016). Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting. Cham: Springer.
Commercial Aviation Safety Team. (2013). Phase of Flight Definitions and Usage Notes. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization.
Cusick, S., Cortés, A., & Rodrigues, C. (2017). Commercial Aviation Safety. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
EUROCONTROL. (2021). European Flight Movements and Service Units Three Scenarios for Recovery from COVID-19. Retrieved from www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/2021-10/eurocontrol-7-year-forecast-2021-2027.pdf.
Gosling, G., Muir, A., Hunt, C., Schneemann, G., & Speyer, J. (eds.). (2003). Guide to Methods & Tools for Airline Safety Analysis. Retrieved from https://skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/237.pdf.
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2015). Manual of Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation. Retrieved from https://skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/3282.pdf.
Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5-55.
Montgomery, D., Jennings, C., & Kulahci, M. (2015). Introduction to Time Series Analysis and Forecasting. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiegmann, D., & Shappell, S. (2003). A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.