IS THERE A SERIOUS BREACH OF ASEAN CHARTER?: A CASE STUDY OF THE MYANMAR MILITARY COUP 2021 VIOLENCE AGAINST CIVILIANS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/ijclsi.2023.1Keywords:
Non-interference Principle, ASEAN Charter, ASEAN Human RightsAbstract
This article is written from the perspective of ASEAN Charter to explain that a serious breach of ASEAN Charter does not exist in the case of the Myanmar military coup violence against civilians in February 2021. To analyze why article 5(3) could not be activated in practice to address the Myanmar military coup 2021 violence against civilians as a serious breach of ASEAN Charter, there are three elements to analyze and found that (1) no definition of serious breach and non-compliance of charter, (2) the final responsible body to address an issue of serious breach and non-compliance of ASEAN Charter is ASEAN Summit under article 20(4) but in practice this article pass a duty to interpret its definition of serious breach of charter to ASEAN Secretariat which has a very limit power under article 51(2) and Rule 2(1) of Rules of procedure for the interpretation of the ASEAN Charter 2012, and (3) decision making mode for applying article 5(3) is belong to article 20(1) (consultation and consensus method) which is based on politic compromise way more than legal binding way. Hence to unlock article 5(3) for addressing an issue of serious breach of ASEAN Charter, ASEAN needs to revise the decision-making mode under article 20(1) of ASEAN Charter by applying the majority vote or negative consensus (reverse consensus) method for the ASEAN Summit instead of consultation and positive consensus.
References
Andrews, T. (2021). UN Expert: Sham Sentence of Myanmar Leadership Highlights Need for Stronger International Action. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/RapporteurUn/status/1467853020553793544.
ASEAN. (n.d.). History. Retrieved from https://asean.org/category/about-asean/history/.
ASEAN. (2007). Twelfth ASEAN Summit, Cebu, Philippines, 9-15 January 2007. Retrieved from https://asean.org/speechandstatement/12th-asean-summit-cebu-philippines-9-15-january-2007/.
ASEAN. (2012). Rules of Procedure for the Interpretation of the ASEAN Charter. Retrieved from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/documents/ROP%20for%20Interpretation%20of%20ASEAN%20Charter.pdf.
ASEAN. (2015). The ASEAN Charter. Retrieved from www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/11.-October-2015-The-ASEAN-Charter-18th-Reprint-Amended-updated-on-05_-April-2016-IJP.pdf.
ASEAN. (2017). ASEAN Political-Security Community. Retrieved from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/7b.-May-2017-Factsheet-on-APSC.pdf.
BBC. (2021). Aung San Suu Kyi: Myanmar Court sentences ousted leader in widely criticized trial. Retrieved from www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-59544484.
CNN. (2021). Myanmar’s Aung San Suu Kyi faces two years in jail after her sentence is halved. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/06/asia/suu-kyi-verdict-sentence-myanmar-intl-hnk/index.html.
Garner, B. (2009). Black’s Law Dictionary. 9th ed. Minnesota: Thomsom Reuters.
Koh, T., Manalo, R., & Woon, W. (eds.). (2009). The Making of the ASEAN Charter. Singapore: World Scientific.
Latiff, R., & Allard, T. (2021). ASEAN to discuss excluding Myanmar army leader from summit-sources. Retrieved from www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/asean-meet-discuss-possible-exclusion-myanmar-leader-summit-sources-2021-10-14/.
Leviter, L. (2010). The ASEAN Charter: ASEAN Failure or Member Failure?. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 43(4), 200-201.
Limsiritong, N. (2016). The Deadlock of ASEAN Dispute Settlement Mechanisms and Why ASEAN Cannot Unlock It?. RSU International Journal of College of Government, 3(1), 18-25.
Limsiritong, N. (2017). Why ASEAN Fails to Play Role in the Rohingya Situation from the Perspective of ASEAN Charter. Asian Political Science Review, 1(2), 73-79.
Limsiritong, N. (2018). The Power Limitation of ASEAN Inter-Governmental Human Rights Commission Under the Perspective of ASEAN Charter in Case of the Rohingya Issue. International Journal of Crime, Law and Social Issues, 5(2), 32-38.
Limsiritong, N., Springall, A., & Rojanawanichkij, O. (2019). The Difficulty of ASEAN Decision Making Mode on South China Sea Dispute: The ASEAN Charter Perspective. Asian Political Science Review, 3(1), 25-33.
Maizland, L. (2022). Myanmar’s Troubled History: Coups, Military Rule, and Ethnic Conflict. Retrieved from www.cfr.org/backgrounder/myanmar-history-coup-military-rule-ethnic-conflict-rohingya.
Ng, E., & Gomez, J. (2021). Myanmar skips ASEAN summit after its military ruler excluded. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/business-asia-myanmar-global-trade-southeast-asia-6e9b0e627dd0fafda76d5d13a3817bcb.
Sharom, A. (ed). (2016). Human Rights Outlook in Southeast Asia: 2014-2015. Nakhorn Pathom: Strengthening Human Rights and Peace Research and Education in ASEAN/Southeast Asia.
Singapore Institute of International Affairs. (2014). Reviewing the ASEAN Charter: An Opportunity to Reform ASEAN Processes. Retrieved from www.siiaonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2014-10-Policy-Brief-Reviewing-the-ASEAN-Charter-An-Opportunity-to-Reform-ASEAN-Processes.pdf.
Sookhakich, P., & Limsiritong, N. (2021). Power of ASEAN Secretariat to interpret the ASEAN Charter. Psychology and Education, 58(2), 1940-1946.
Strangio, S. (2021). ASEAN Envoy Cancels Planned Myanmar Trip Due to Junta Stonewalling. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2021/10/asean-envoy-cancels-planned-myanmar-trip-due-to-junta-stonewalling/.
United Nations. (2021). Myanmar: UN deplores conviction and sentencing of Aung San Suu Kyi. Retrieved from https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/12/1107202.
Wong, R. (2012). Model Power or Reference Point? The EU and the ASEAN Charter. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(4), 669-682.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
.png)
