The Curriculum Evaluation on Master Degree Program of Fine Arts in Visual Art Education, Faculty of Painting Sculpture and Graphic Arts and Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University (edition 2018)

Main Article Content

WISUD PO NGERN

Abstract

The research’s a progress evaluation research. The objective’s to evaluate the Master of Arts program in Visual Arts Education, Faculty of Painting, Sculpture and Graphic Arts and Faculty of Education Silpakorn University (edition 2018) in the context of the curriculum Input factors process and production aspects by evaluating the output during the course and to study the problem and guidelines for curriculum development Collect quantitative and qualitative data. By using a questionnaire and interview topics. Statistics used are percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The results: 1) The results of the overall evaluation of the curriculum found that students and instructors/thesis examination committee members There was an opinion that it was appropriate at the highest level. 2) Results of the context assessment It is appropriate at the highest level. 3) Results of the evaluation of input factors. It is at the highest level of appropriateness, divided into 2 areas: the media used in learning management and the subjects in the curriculum. is at the highest level 4) The process evaluation results found that it was appropriate at the highest level with 2 aspects including the learning management process and measurement and evaluation, and 5) the results of the productivity evaluation found that it was appropriate at the highest level.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย (Research Articles)

References

Apinapas J. (2017). “The Curriculum Evaluation on Master Degree Program of Fine Arts in Visual Art

Education, Faculty of Painting Sculpture and Graphic Arts and Faculty of Education, Silpakorn

University”. Jounal of E-Veridian, Silpakorn University. 10(3). (September – December, 2017). pp. 2270 -2287.

Maream, N., et al. (2012). Evaluation of the Graduate Curriculum in Curriculum and Instruction,

Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University. Nakhon Pathom: Silpakorn University.

Ministry of Education. (2010). The Announcement of the Higher Education Commission Regarding Guidelines for Implementation According to the Standards Framework for Qualifications of Higher Education, 2009 .[Online], accessed 20 October 2023. Available from http://www.mua.go.th/users/tqf-hed/

Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2015). Standards Framework for Qualifications of Higher Education, Annexed to the

Announcement of the Higher Education Commission Regarding Guidelines for Implementation According to the Standards Framework for Qualifications of Higher Education, National Higher Education Standards 2015. [Online] Accessed on June 14, 2023, from http://www.mua.go.th/users/tqf-hed/

Office of the National of Economic and Social Development Council. (2023). The Thirteenth National of Economic and Social Development Plan (2023 – 2027). Bangkok : Office of Ministry.

Print Murry.(1993). Curriculum Development and Design. London : Routledge.

Silpakorn University. (2011). Manual for educational quality assurance within educational

institutions Higher education, 2010. [Online], accessed 14 November 2023. Available from

http://www.educ.su.ac.th/images /stories/Download_document /quality_assurance/manual_sar_2553_nov.pdf.

Stufflebeam D. L. and Shinkfield A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models & applications.

CA : Jossey - Bass.

Thumrong B. (1999). Theory of Curriculum Design and development. Bangkok : Arawan Publishing.

Wisud P., Wisa J., Maream N., Orapin S. and Athikamas M. (2017). “The Curriculum Evaluation on

Master Degree Program of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University”. Jounal of E-Veridian, Silpakorn University. 10(3). (September – December, 2017). pp. 1180 -1196.