STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF LEARNING HOSPITALITY RELATED ENGLISH VOCABULARY USING THE LINE SOCIAL NETWORKING APPLICATION ON MOBILE DEVICES IN THE CLASSROOM AT THE UNDERGRADUATE LEVEL

Main Article Content

Alan Robert White
Parawee Namwong

Abstract

Thai graduates from hospitality and tourism programs need English vocabulary related to their industry in order to communicate with foreign visitors. Acquiring enough vocabulary to confidently converse in a foreign language though requires regular practice. Social networking applications are used by instructors to assist students in learning vocabulary for specific purposes. This study aimed to examine students’ perceptions of using the Line social networking application for learning hospitality related English vocabulary as part of a classroom lesson. The mean averages gained from the 5 point Likert scale questionnaire showed significant differences from the neutral value of 3.40. Perception of learning was found to be 4.36, satisfaction was 4.31, ease of use was 4.51 and media quality was 4.50. This study found that students were satisfied when learning through the Line application in a university level course.

Article Details

How to Cite
Robert White, A., & Namwong, P. (2020). STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF LEARNING HOSPITALITY RELATED ENGLISH VOCABULARY USING THE LINE SOCIAL NETWORKING APPLICATION ON MOBILE DEVICES IN THE CLASSROOM AT THE UNDERGRADUATE LEVEL. RMUTK Journal of Liberal Arts, 2(2), 20–30. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/larts-journal/article/view/244882
Section
Research Articles

References

Afreen, R. (2014). Bring your own device (BYOD) in higher education: opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science, 3(1), 233-236.

Andersson, D., Reimers, K., & Maxwell, S. (2013). Utilizing the Web to Enhance Student Engagement and Achievement; (International Technology, Education and Development Conference) Valencia, Spain.

Baba, P. A. (2014). Technology in the classroom: A tool or a drag. Technology, 5(27). 75-7

Basal, A., Yilmaz, S., Tanriverdi, A., & Sari, L. (2016). Effectiveness of Mobile Applications in Vocabulary Teaching. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(1), 47-59.

Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, Ö. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1-7.

Bloom, K. C., & Shuell, T. J. (1981). Effects of Massed and Distributed Practice on the Learning and Retention of Second-Language Vocabulary. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(4), 245-248.

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers' adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136.

Cavus, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2009). M‐Learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British journal of educational technology, 40(1), 78-91.

Chang, J. H., & Huynh, P. (2016). ASEAN in Transformation: The Future of Jobs at Risk of Automation. International Labour Organization.

Choosri, C. (2014). Relationship between motivation and students’ English learning achievement: A study of the second–year vocational certificate level Hatyai Technical College Students. The 3rd International Conference on Humanities and Social. Sciences. 1-15.

Dehghan, F., Rezvani, R., & Fazeli, S. (2017). Social networks and their effectiveness in learning foreign language vocabulary: A comparative study using WhatsApp. CALL-EJ, 18(2) 1-13.

DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage: Thousand Oaks.

Elgort, I. (2018). Teaching / Developing Vocabulary Using ICTs and Digital Resources. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-15.

Ellis, V., & Loveless, A. (2013). ICT, pedagogy and the curriculum: Subject to change. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Fattah, S. F. E. S. A. (2015). The Effectiveness of Using WhatsApp Messenger as One of Mobile Learning Techniques to Develop Students’ Writing Skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(32), 115-127.

Fredrickson, T. (2015). Thailand’s English skills lagging, says training company. Retrieved from http://www.Bangkok Post.com

Hayati, A., Jalilifar, A., & Mashhadi, A. (2013). Using Short Message Service (SMS) to teach English idioms to EFL students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 66-81.

Hwang, W. Y., Chen, H. S., Shadiev, R., Huang, R. Y. M., & Chen, C. Y. (2014). Improving English as a foreign language writing in elementary schools using mobile devices in familiar situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 359-378.

Khamkhien, A. (2010). Factors affecting language learning strategy reported usage by Thai and Vietnamese EFL learners. Electronic Journal of foreign Language teaching, 7(1), 66-85.

Klímová, B. (2017). Mobile phones and/or smartphones and their apps for teaching English as a foreign language. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1091-1099.

Lai, W. (2014). Using mobile instant messenger (WhatsApp) to support second language learning. Master’s thesis of Hong Kong University.

Lawrence, D. (2014). Students’ Experiences of Using SMS for Vocabulary Development–a Case Study. In Conference proceedings of ICT for language learning, 310.

Li, J., Li, S., & Li, Y. (2016). English learning on the move: A survey and study of mobile app assisted English learning in Chinese tertiary education. Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 2016 11th International Conference, 767-771.

Liao, P., & Lin, C. S. (2016). Innovation design: Integrating mobile-mediated communication with computational intelligence for task-based EFL learning in Taiwanese higher education. Eighth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI), 186-192.

Liu, M., Abe, K., Cao, M., Liu, S., Ok, D. U., Park, J. B., & Sardegna, V. G. (2015). An analysis of social network websites for language learning: Implications for teaching and learning English as a Second Language. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 114.

Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76-85.

McCarty, S., Sato, T., & Obari, H. (2016). Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology Case Study: Smartphone App LINE for EFL Peer Learning. In Implementing Mobile Language Learning Technologies in Japan, 33-56. Singapore: Springer Briefs in Education.

Nicholls, P. (2014). The ASEAN Mutual Recognition Agreement on Tourism Professionals in Thailand: A Mixed Blessing? AU-GSB e-Journal. 7(1).

Noom-Ura, S. (2013). English-teaching problems in Thailand and Thai teachers’ professional development needs. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 139.

Ozyurt, O. (2015). An Analysis on Distance Education Computer Programming Students’ Attitudes Regarding Programming and their Self-efficacy for Programming. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 111-121.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5).

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

Rott, S. (1999). The Effect of Exposure Frequency on Intermediate Language Learners’ Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition through Reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4) 589–619.

Siegle, D. (2014). Technology differentiating instruction by flipping the classroom. Gifted Child Today, 37(1), 51-55.

Suwantarathip, O. & Orawiwatnakul, W. (2015). Using mobile-assisted exercises to support students’ vocabulary skill development. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 163-171.

Thalheimer, W. (2006). Spacing learning events over time: What the research says. Work-Learning Research.

Zou, D., Wang, F. L., Xie, H., & Kohnke, L. (2018). Game-Based Vocabulary Learning in China and Hong Kong: Students’ Evaluation of Different Word Learning APPs. International Conference on Technology in Education, 44-55.