Distinguishing Copy, Inspiration, and Imitation: Analyzing the Dynamics of Creative Influence in Dance

Dharakorn Chandnasaro

doi:10.69598/sbjfa278958

Authors

Dharakorn Chandnasaro Assistant Professor, Ph.D., Department of Dance, Faculty of Fine Arts, Srinakharinwirot University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69598/sbjfa278958

Keywords:

Creative Influence, Imitation and Ethics, Contemporary Choreography, Intellectual Property in Performing Arts

Abstract

This article critically investigates the nuanced distinctions between copying, inspiration, and imitation in contemporary choreographic practice, foregrounding the complex mechanisms by which creative influence operates in dance. Positioned within interrelated historical, aesthetic, legal, and ethical paradigms, the study challenges simplistic notions of originality versus derivation, arguing instead for a more layered understanding of intertextuality and artistic lineage. Drawing from theorists such as Harold Bloom, Julia Kristeva, and Rosalind Krauss, the analysis situates choreographic borrowing within dialogic and intergenerational frameworks that reveal how inherited movement vocabularies continue to inform new work. Historical perspectives demonstrate that replication, once essential to cultural continuity in traditional dance, now intersects with modern imperatives for innovation. Case studies—including the Beyoncé–De Keersmaeker controversy, Pina Bausch’s choreographic strategies, and imitation in digital platforms—exemplify the ethical and legal complexities surrounding appropriation in a globalized context. The article contends that responsible artistic influence requires transparency, transformation, and contextual awareness. Moreover, it calls for legal frameworks that recognize both individual authorship and communal knowledge, especially within digital and non-Western settings. Ultimately, the study promotes a historically grounded, ethically informed, and culturally sensitive model of creative influence, vital for sustaining a pluralistic and critically engaged global dance practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfaro, M. J. M. (1996). Intertextuality: Origins and development of the concept. Atlantis, 18(1/2), 268–285. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41054827

Anderson, J. (2018). Ballet & modern dance: A concise history (3rd ed.). Princeton Book Company.

Betlemidze, M. (2025). Jalaiah Effect: A story of a stolen dance on TikTok and trans-platformization of ignorance. Social Media + Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251317765

Blanning, T. (2012). The romantic revolution: A history. Random House Publishing Group.

Bloom, H. (1972). Coleridge: The anxiety of influence. Diacritics, 2(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/464923

______. (1997). The anxiety of influence: A theory of poetry (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Boffone, T. (2021). Introduction: A tale of two teens; or, how the Renegade was born. In Renegades: Digital dance cultures from Dubsmash to TikTok. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197577677.003.0001

Celda Real, O. (2022). Pina Bausch and the dancing body: Social constructionism and identity in Nelken, The Rite of Spring and Kontakthof. Itamar. Revista de investigación musical: Territorios para el arte, (8), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.7203/itamar.8.24812

Chevrier-Bosseau, A. (2023). “Gestures of air and stone”: Translating Ethan Frome into dance in Cathy Marston’s Snowblind. Transatlantica, 2, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.4000/transatlantica.22211

Clements, L., & Nordin-Bates, S. (2020). Inspired or inhibited? Choreographers’ views on how classical ballet training shaped their creativity. Journal of Dance Education, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2020.1744154

Climenhaga, R. (2009). Pina Bausch. Routledge.

Demeilliez, M. (2024). La circulation des danseurs parisiens au XVIIIe siècle : Des théâtres professionnels aux ballets jésuites. Littératures Classiques, 113(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.3917/licla1.113.0061

Duff, D. (2002). Intertextuality versus genre theory: Bakhtin, Kristeva and the question of genre. Paragraph, 25(1), 54–73. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43263675

Engstrom, D. F., Ho, D. E., Sharkey, C. M., & Cuéllar, M.-F. (2020). Government by algorithm: Artificial intelligence in federal administrative agencies (Report submitted to the Administrative Conference of the United States). Stanford University. https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ACUS-AI-Report.pdf

Flatt, K. (2019). Choreography: Creating and developing dance for performance. The Crowood Press.

Florencio, J. (2015). Enmeshed bodies, impossible touch: The object-oriented world of Pina Bausch’s Café Müller. Performance Research, 20(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2015.1026719

Foster, S. (2010). Choreographing empathy: Kinesthesia in performance. Routledge.

Gordon, N. (2022). DANCEchARTS: A framework for dance education today. Boeklyn.

Grueny, C. (2024). Struggling with the Louvre: De Keersmaeker, Beyoncé, Jay-Z. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, 46(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1162/pajj_a_00696

Harris, M. (2020, February 18). The original 'Renegade' dance creator performed at the NBA All-Star Game and met up with Charli D'Amelio for a TikTok collab [Photograph]. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/renegade-creator-danced-charli-damelio-nba-all-star-game-2020-2

Hunt, M. E. (2014, October 1). Copying choreography. DanceTeacher. https://dance-teacher.com/copying-choreography/#gsc.tab=0

Jennings, L. (2011, October 11). Beyoncé v De Keersmaeker: Can you copyright a dance move?. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2011/oct/11/beyonce-de-keersmaeker-dance-move

Klein, G. (2020). Pina Bausch’s dance theater: Company, artistic practices and reception. transcript publishing.

Krauss, R. E. (1986). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. The MIT Press.

Kraut, A. (2015). Choreographing copyright: Race, gender, and intellectual property rights in American dance. Oxford University Press.

Laland, K., Wilkins, C., & Clayton, N. (2016). The evolution of dance. Current Biology, 26(1), R5–R9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.031

Lorenz, T. (2020, February 13). The original Renegade: A 14-year-old in Atlanta created one of the biggest dances on the internet. But nobody really knows that. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/13/style/the-original-renegade.html

Mackrell, J. (2013, October 9). Beyoncé, De Keersmaeker – and a dance reinvented by everyone. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2013/oct/09/beyonce-de-keersmaeker-technology-dance

Minakshi, M. (2025). The concept of intertextuality in Julia Kristeva's hypothesis. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 10(1), 250–251. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijels.101.37

Mix, G. (2023). Choreography and copyright: Why the law must twist and turn to serve the dancing industry. Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & Law, 16(1), 65–104. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/jbel/vol16/iss1/3

Needham, M. (1997). Louis XIV and the Académie Royale de Danse, 1661: A commentary and translation. Dance Chronicle, 20(2), 173–190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1568065

O’Cadiz, D. (2020). Dance and cultural diversity (3rd ed.). Cognella Academic Publishing.

Ostrow, M. D., & Sanders, E. (2022, August 11). Copyrighting and licensing choreography. Romano Law. https://www.romanolaw.com/copyrighting-and-licensing-choreography/

Picart, C. J. S. (2013). Critical race theory and copyright in American dance: Whiteness as status property. Palgrave Macmillan.

Ravetto-Biagioli, K. (2021). Whose dance is it anyway? Property, copyright and the commons. Theory, Culture & Society, 38(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420925534

Rosenthal, L. (2019). Romanticism. Parkstone International.

Ruyter, N. C. (1973). American Delsartism: Precursor of an American dance art. Educational Theatre Journal, 25(4), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/3205595

Stadtler, S. (2012). Preservation and protection in dance licensing: How choreographers use contract to fill in the gaps of copyright and custom. The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 35(2), 252–292. https://doi.org/10.7916/jla.v35i2.2176

Sudmann, A. (Ed.). (2020). The democratization of artificial intelligence: Net politics in the era of learning algorithms. Transcript Verlag.

Thakur, R. (2023). The complexities of copyrighting choreography: A legal and cultural perspective on copyright protection for dance. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 3686–3695. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.5397

Thomas, H. (2003). The body, dance and cultural theory. Red Globe Press.

Thompson, P. (2011, October 11). ‘This is plagiarism’: Beyoncé accused of copying choreography in new Countdown video [Photograph]. MailOnline. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2047520/Beyonc-accused-copying-choreography-new-Countdown-video.html

Van Dyke, J. (1992). Modern dance in a postmodern world: An analysis of federal arts funding and its impact on the field of modern dance. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance.

Vargas, S. (2021, January 25). What copyright protections do choreographers have over their work?. Dance Magazine. https://dancemagazine.com/choreography-copyright/#gsc.tab=0

Vaughan, W. (1994). Romanticism and art (2nd ed). Thames & Hudson.

Weiss, U. (n.d.). Jean Laurent Sasportes, Malou Airaudo and Pina Bausch in “Café Müller” by Pina Bausch [Photograph]. Pina Bausch Foundation Archives. https://archives.pinabausch.org/id/cafe_30035373_44_0000

______. (n.d.). Poster for “Nelken (Carnations)” by Pina Bausch [Poster]. Pina Bausch Foundation Archives. https://archives.pinabausch.org/id/nelk_30040016_72_0100

Wosniak, C. (2018). Pina Bausch and Café Müller on screen: The mise-en-scène of co-presence of bodies and closed eyes. Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Presença, 8(3), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-266076227