Peer-Review Process

Criteria for Reviewing Articles:

Review Process:

 

1. Screening: All submitted articles will be carefully reviewed by the editorial team. Articles that are inconsistent with the objectives and scope of the journal, or those that violate publication ethics by containing plagiarism, will be rejected at this stage.

 

2. Evaluation by Experts: If an article passes the screening stage, the editorial team will enlist 3 experienced experts knowledgeable about the article's topic. To ensure impartiality, the experts must not have conflicts of interest with the author. They will conduct a double-blind review.

 

3. Notification of Assessment: After the editorial team receives the reviews, the author will be notified of the outcome, along with comments and suggestions from both the reviewers and the editor. The author will receive one of four types of notifications: pass, pass with minor adjustments, pass with major adjustments, or fail. If the article passes without further adjustments, it will proceed to the publishing stage.

 

4. Improvement: If the author receives a notification recommending adjustments, they must edit the article based on the comments and suggestions. The author must resubmit the revised article within one month. If major adjustments are necessary, the experts will re-evaluate the article.

 

5. Article Publication: Once an article has been evaluated, it will be published in the Silpa Bhirasri Journal online. The articles will be ranked according to the acceptance letter issued by the journal.