Peer-Review Process
Criteria for Reviewing Articles:
Review Process:
1. Screening: All submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editorial team to ensure alignment with the journal's objectives and scope. Articles that do not meet these criteria or violate publication ethics, such as those containing plagiarism, will be rejected at this stage. This initial screening process is completed within 2 weeks.
2. Evaluation by Experts: Articles that pass the screening stage will be reviewed by three experienced experts with knowledge relevant to the article's topic. To ensure impartiality, reviewers must have no conflicts of interest with the authors. A double-blind review process will be conducted, and this stage is completed within 4 weeks.
3. Notification of Assessment: Upon receiving the reviewers' evaluations, the editorial team will notify the author of the decision, accompanied by comments and suggestions from the reviewers and the editor. The decision will fall into one of four categories: accepted, accepted with minor revisions, accepted with major revisions, or rejected. Articles accepted without further revisions will proceed directly to the publishing stage.
4. Improvement: If the author receives a notification recommending revisions, they must revise the article in accordance with the provided comments and suggestions. The revised manuscript must be resubmitted within 4 weeks. For articles requiring major revisions, the experts will re-evaluate the resubmitted manuscript.
5. Article Publication: Upon final acceptance, the article will be published online in the Silpa Bhirasri Journal. Articles will be published in the order of acceptance as indicated in the official acceptance letter issued by the journal.