Comparative analysis the laws regarding housing estate juristic person regulations of Thailand, United States of America and People's Republic of China

Abstract

This article aimed to study 1) the principles concepts and theories about the laws regarding housing estate juristic person regulations of Thailand. 2) Comparative analysis the laws regarding housing estate juristic person regulations of Thailand, United States of America and People's Republic of China. 3) To study guidelines for improving the law on housing estate juristic persons in Thailand to be fair to housing estate members and housing estate juristic persons. This study used qualitative research and documentary research by studying various legal provisions. Other related books, documents, articles, research reports, thesis, including information from the Internet. The results showed that the Land Appropriation Act B.E. 2543 (2000) There is still no clarity on the investigation of housing entities that commit corruption. In the case of the United States, the Housing Holders Association shall have the power to prosecute cases alleging non-compliance with the law, according to the establishment document. Rules of the Association for the Litigation of Members or Directors officers of the association or prosecution of tenants. Residents of such land or use common areas and are not limited to the right of any group member to sue without going through the association and such members cannot act on behalf of the association. Impose penalties in case of house and land development enterprises receiving money for expenses incorrectly. The state organization has the right to order the house and land development enterprises to return the money charged. In serious cases, the organization or agency where the government organization is located shall impose administrative sanctions on the officials directly responsible to impose penalties for duty or corruption, which is different from Thai law.