Implementing Nature-based Solutions: Learning from Benchakitti Forest Park in Bangkok
Main Article Content
Abstract
Given the limited number of case studies reflecting Nature-based Solutions (NbS) implemented in the Global South, existing cases of NbS within the city of Bangkok offer valuable lessons. This article aims to document and discuss the design process involved in implementing the NbS concept for Benchakitti Forest Park in Bangkok. The methodology involves a narrative literature review, qualitative content analysis, and interdisciplinary discussion. The article is complemented by insights from the landscape architect responsible for the park’s design and inspection during the construction process. The results are presented in three parts: optimizing the benefits of NbS, barriers to NbS, and the implementation of the design for Benchakitti Forest Park in Bangkok. The discussion centers on exploring opportunities and challenges in implementing the NbS concept, particularly in the context of a tropical monsoon climate. By deepening the understanding and contextualizing NbS, Benchakitti Forest Park is proposed as a valuable case study for learning landscape architectural design concepts and strategies related to NbS, offering efficient local construction methods, and adhering to specified time frames and budgets. At the early stage after opening to the public in 2022, there should be scientific proof of the park’s performance reflected in ecosystem services and disservices. Our study emphasizes the need for a long-term site monitoring program, landscape management framework, and guidelines to manage the urban wild space which should be integrated with educational programs and multi-stakeholder visioning for NbS.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, unless otherwise stated. As such, authors are free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The authors must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The authors may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. The authors may not use the material for commercial purposes. If the authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material, unless permission is obtained from JARS. Final, accepted versions of the paper may be posted on third party repositories, provided appropriate acknowledgement to the original source is clearly noted.
References
Abello, R. P., & Bernaldez, F. G. (1986). Landscape preference and personality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(86)90004-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(86)90004-6
Aboufazeli, S., Jahani, A., & Farahpour, M. (2021). A method for aesthetic quality modelling of the form of plants and water in the urban parks landscapes: An artificial neural network approach. MethodsX, 8. 101489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101489
Agaton, C. B., & Guila, P. M. C. (2023). Ecosystem services valuation of constructed wetland as a nature-based solution to wastewater treatment. Earth , 4(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth4010006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/earth4010006
Albert, C., Spangenberg, J., & Schröter, B. (2017). Nature-based solutions: Criteria. Nature, 543, 315. https://doi.org/10.1038/543315b DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/543315b
Albert, C., Brillinger, M., Guerrero, P., Gottwald, S., Henze, J., Stefan, S., Ott, E., & Schröter B. (2021). Planning nature-based solutions: Principles, steps, and insights. Ambio, 50, 1446-1461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01365-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01365-1
Almenar, J. B., Elliot, T., Rugani, B., Philippe, B., Gutierrez, T. N., Sonnemann, G., & Geneletti, D. (2021). Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges. Land Use Policy, 100, 104898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104898
Bush, J., & Doyon, A. (2019). Building urban resilience with nature-based solutions: How can urban planning contribute?. Cities, 95, 102483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483
Chandrasiri, O., & Arifwidodo, S. (2017). Inequality in active public park: A case study of Benjakitti Park in Bangkok, Thailand. Procedia Engineering, 198, 193 – 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.083
Cheesbrough, A. E., Garvin, T., & Nykiforuk, C. I. J. (2019). Everyday wild: Urban natural areas, health, and well-being. Health and Place, 56, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.005
Chen, S., Sleipness, O., Xu, Y., Park, K., & Christensen, K. (2020). A systematic review of alternative protocols for evaluating non-spatial dimensions of urban parks. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 53, 126718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126718
Chitwatkulsiri, D., Miyamoto, H., Irvine, K. N., Pilailar, S., & Loc, H. H. (2022). Development and application of a real-time flood forecasting system (RTFlood System) in a tropical urban area: A case study of Ramkhamhaeng Polder, Bangkok, Thailand. Water, 14(10), 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14101641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14101641
Colley, K., & Craig, T. (2019). Natural places: Perceptions of wildness and attachment to local greenspace. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61, 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.12.007
Davies, C., & Lafortezza, R. (2019). Transitional path to the adoption of nature-based solutions. Land Use Policy, 80, 406-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.020
Dinda, S. & Ghosh, S. (2021). Perceived benefits, aesthetic preferences and willingness to pay for visiting urban parks: A case study in Kolkata, India. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.12.007
Do, Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2020). An assessment of the aesthetic value of protected wetlands based on a photo content and its metadata. Ecological Engineering, 150, 105816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105816
Dorst, H., van der Jagt, A., Raven, R., & Runhaar, H. (2019). Urban greening through nature-based solutions – Key characteristics of an emerging concept. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49, 101620. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101620
Drainage and Sewage Department. (2024). Khō̜mūn khunnaphāp nam khlō̜ng chalīa rāy pī (2540-patčhuban) [Average water quality in canals within Bangkok Metropolitan Administration]. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J-e7zsioniuVyjYEXuJ17iewSukW049Q/edit?gid=376494751#gid=376494751
Dreiseitl, H., Leonardsen, J. A., & Wanschura, B. (2015). Cost-benefit analysis of Bishan-Ang Mo Kio park, Singapore. Dreiseitl Consulting. https://ramboll.com/-/media/files/rnewmarkets/herbert-dreiseitl_part-1_final- report_22052015.pdf?la=en
Eggermont, H., Balian, E., Azevedo, J. M. N., Beumer, V., Brodin, T., Claudet, J., Fady, B., Grube, M., Keune, H., Lamarque, P., Reuter, K., Smith, M., van Ham, C., Weisser, W., & Le Roux, X. (2015). Nature-based solutions: New influence for environmental management and research in Europe. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(4), 243-248. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.24.4.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.24.4.9
Escobedo, F. J., Giannico, V., Jim, C. Y., Sanesi, G., & Lafortezza, R. (2019). Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors?. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 37, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011
Fastenrath, S., Bush, J., & Coenen, L. (2020). Scaling-up nature-based solutions: Lessons from the Living Melbourne strategy. Geoforum, 116, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.011
Ferreira, C. S. S., Potočki, K., Kapović-Solomun, M., & Kalantari, Z. (2022). Nature-based solutions for flood mitigation and resilience in urban areas. In C. S. S. Ferreira, Z. Kalantari, T. Hartmann & P. Pereira (Eds.), Nature-based solutions for flood mitigation: Environmental and socio-economic aspects (Vol. 107, pp. 59-78). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/698_2021_758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2021_758
Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities. Environmental Science and Policy, 93, 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033
Frantzeskaki, N., Vandergert, P., Connop, S., Schipper, K., Zwierzchowska, I., Collier, M., & Lodder, M. (2020). Examining the policy needs for implementing nature-based solutions in cities: Findings from city-wide transdisciplinary experiences in Glasgow (UK), Genk (Belgium) and Poznań (Poland). Land Use Policy, 96, 104688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104688
Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 34(3-4), 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012
Gulsrud, N. M., Raymond, C. M., Rutt, R. L., Olafsson, A. S., Plieninger, T., Sandberg, M., Beery, T. H., & Jönsson, K. I. (2018). ‘Rage against the machine’? the opportunities and risks concerning the automation of urban green infrastructure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.012
Gungor, S., & Polat, A. T. (2018). Relationship between visual quality and landscape characteristics in urban parks. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 19(2), 939-948. https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/326941365_Relationship_between_visual_quality_and_landscape_characteristics_in_urban_parks
Haase, A. (2017). The Contribution of nature-based solutions to socially inclusive urban development–some reflections from a social-environmental perspective. In N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler & A. Bonn (Eds.), Nature‐based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas: Linkages between science, policy and practice (pp. 221-236). Springer Open. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_13
Hamel, P., & Tan, L. (2022). Blue–green infrastructure for flood and water quality management in Southeast Asia: Evidence and knowledge gaps. Environmental Management, 69, 699–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01467-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01467-w
Huai, S., Chen, F., Liu, S., Canters, F., & Van de Voorde, T. (2022). Using social media photos and computer vision to assess cultural ecosystem services and landscape features in urban parks. Ecosystem Services, 57, 101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101475
Hwang, Y. H., & Roscoe, C. J. (2017). Preference for site conservation in relation to on-site biodiversity and perceived site attributes: An on-site survey of unmanaged urban greenery in a tropical city. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 28, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.09.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.09.011
Kendal, D., Ford, R. M., Anderson, N. M., Farrar, A. (2015). The VALS: A new tool to measure people’s general valued attributes of landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 163, 224-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.017
Kennen, K., & Kirkwood, N. (2015). Phyto principles and resources for site remediation and landscape design. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746661
Routledge.
Koottatep, T., & Panuvatvanich, A. (2010). Constructed wetlands for effective wastewater treatment. In K. Irvine, T. Murphy, V. Vanchan & S. Vermette (Eds). Water resources and development in Southeast Asia (pp. 179–192). Pearson.
Kongjian, Y., & Dong, W. (2023). Modular approach creating low-maintenance sponge city: Benjakitti Forest Park in Bangkok, Thailand. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 11(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-0-040003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-0-040003
Lee, L.-H. (2017). Perspectives on landscape aesthetics for the ecological conservation of wetlands. Wetlands, 37(2). 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0873-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0873-1
Li, H., Peng, J., Jiao, Y., & Ai, S. (2022a). Experiencing urban green and blue spaces in urban wetlands as a nature-based solution to promote positive emotions. Forests, 13(3), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030473
Li, X. P., Fan, S.-X., Hao, P.-Y., & Dong, L. (2019). Temporal variations of spontaneous plants colonizing in different type of planted vegetation-a case of Beijing Olympic Forest Park. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 46, 126459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126459
Li, Y., Wang, G., Chen, T., Zhang, R., Zhou, L., & Yan, L. (2022b). Nature-based solutions in “forest–wetland” spatial planning strategies to promote sustainable city development in Tianjin, China. Land, 11(8), 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081227
Likitswat, F., Dejnirattisai, S., Sahavacharin, A., Irvine, K. N., & Chua, L. H. C. (2023). Designing ecological floating wetlands to optimize ecosystem eervices for urban resilience in tropical climates: A review. Future Cities and Environment, 9(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5334/fce.168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/fce.168
McKinney, M. L., Ingo, K., & Kendal, D. (2018). The contribution of wild urban ecosystems to liveable cities. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 29, 334-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.09.004
Pan, H., Page, J., Zhang, L., Cong, C., Ferreira, C., Jonsson, E., Näsström, H., Destouni, G., Deal, B., & Kalantari, Z. (2020). Understanding interactions between urban development policies and GHG emissions: A case study in Stockholm region. Ambio, 49, 1313-1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01290-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01290-y
Ramírez-Agudelo, N. A., Anento, R. P., Villares, M., & Roca, E. (2020). Nature-based solutions for water management in peri-urban areas: Barriers and lessons learned from implementation experiences. Sustainability, 12(23), 9799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239799
Sarabi, S., Han, Q., Romme, A. G. L., de Vries, B., Valkenburg, R., & den Ouden, E. (2020). Uptake and implementation of nature-based solutions: An analysis of barriers using Interpretive structural modeling. Journal of Environmental Management, 270, 110749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110749
Sikorska, D., Ciężkowski, W., Babańczyk, P., Chormański, J., & Sikorski, P. (2021). Intended wilderness as a nature-based solution: Status, identification and management of urban spontaneous vegetation in cities. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 62, 127155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127155
Skřivanová, Z., & Kalivoda, O. (2010). Perception and Assessment of Landscape Aesthetic Values in The Czech Republic - a Literature Review. Journal of Landscape Studies, 3, 211-220. https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/272823404_Perception_and_assessment_of_landscape_aesthetic_values_in_the_Czech_Republic_-_a_literature_review
Irvine, K., Likitswat, F., Suwanarit, A., & Koottatep, T. (2022). A multidisciplinary approach to authentic learning experiences for nature-based solutions design: Broadening the monkey cheeks. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 27(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2022.2083789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2022.2083789
Irvine, K. N., Chua, L. H. C., Hua’an, Z., Qi, L. E., & Xuan, L. Y. (2023). Nature-based solutions to manage particle-bound metals in urban stormwater runoff: Current design practices and knowledge gaps. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 23(3), 3671-3688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03365-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03365-y
Jahani, A., Allahverdi, S., Saffariha, M., Alitavoli, A., & Ghiyasi, S. (2022). Environmental modeling of landscape aesthetic value in natural urban parks using artificial neural network technique. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 8(1), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-01068-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-01068-2
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Pauleit, S., Naumann, S., Davis, M., Artmann, M., Haase, D., Knapp, S., Korn, H., Stadler, J., Zaunberger, K., & Bonn, A. (2016). Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: Perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239
Kalinauskas, M., Mikša, K., Inácio, M., Gomes, E., & Pereira, P. (2021). Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania. Journal of Environmental Management, 286, 112239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112239
Katz, D. S. W., Barrie, B. T. C., & Carey, T. S. (2014). Urban ragweed populations in vacant lots: An ecological perspective on management. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 13(4), 756–760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.06.001
Sowińska-Świerkosz, B., & García, J. (2022). What are nature-based solutions (NBS)? setting core ideas for concept clarification. Nature-Based Solutions, 2, 1000009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100009
Stefanakis, A. I. (2019). The role of constructed wetlands as green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management. Sustainability, 11(24), 6981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246981
Sung, C. (2023). Benchakitti park water+forest. In Park & plant 2023 (pp. 80-95). http://park.bangkok.go.th/ebook/2566/?fbclid=IwAR0iraKMtSdEV0Ywpq_HjDrxjYH5LkBtJcqgS9M#p=83
Threlfall, C. G., & Kendal, D. (2018). The distinct ecological and social roles that wild spaces play in urban ecosystems. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 29, 348-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.012
Toxopeus, H., Kotsila, P., Conde, M., Katona, A., van der Jagt, A. P. N., & Polzin, F. (2020). How ‘just’ is hybrid governance of urban nature-based solutions?. Cities, 105, 102839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102839
Toxopeus, H., & Polzin, F. (2021). Reviewing financing barriers and strategies for urban nature-based solutions. Journal of Environmental Management, 289, 112371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112371
Wolff, E., Rauf, H. A., Diep, L., Natakun, B., Kelly, K., & Hamel, P. (2022). Implementing participatory nature-based solutions in the Global South. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4, 956534. https://doi.org/10.3389/ frsc.2022.956534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.956534
Wolff, E., Rauf, H. A., & Hamel, P. (2023). Nature-based solutions in informal settlements: A systematic review of projects in Southeast Asian and Pacific countries. Environmental Science and Policy, 145, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.014
Zwierzchowska, I., Fagiewicz, K., Poniży, L., Lupa, P., & Mizgajski, A. (2019). Introducing nature-based solutions into urban policy–Facts and gaps: Case study of Poznań. Land Use Policy, 85, 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.025