Digital Platforms Legal Status: Addressing Transparency Obligation and Vicarious
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article aims to (1) examine the legal status and roles of online marketplace platform providers, as well as the legal relationships among platforms, sellers, and consumers; (2) examine and compare the laws of Thailand, the United States, and the European Union concerning the obligations to disclose seller information and access to information necessary for consumers to exercise their legal rights and pursue claims; (3) analyze the relationship between the degree of transactional control and the scope of legal obligations and civil liability of online marketplace platforms; and (4) identify limitations in Thai law and propose approaches to legal reform to enhance consumer protection. This study employs a qualitative research methodology based on documentary research and comparative legal analysis of relevant legislation, judicial decisions, and academic literature.
The findings indicate that the legal status and obligations of online marketplace platforms cannot be determined solely by their self-designation as intermediaries in their terms of service; rather, their actual roles in facilitating and controlling transactions must also be considered. The comparative legal analysis reveals differing approaches to regulating seller information disclosure, depending on the scope and conditions of application within each legal system. Furthermore, civil liability must be distinguished from obligations imposed under regulatory law. Although the degree of transactional control and the ability to prevent harm may serve as relevant factors in assessing liability, they do not, in themselves, automatically give rise to civil liability as a matter of law. Accordingly, this article proposes that Thai law should be further developed to clarify consumers' access to seller information and the legal obligations of online marketplace platforms, with due regard to the applicable legal grounds and constituent elements of civil liability.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in articles in the Journal of Arts of Management It is the responsibility of the author of the article. and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team I agree that the article is copyright of the Arts and Management Journal.
References
Baş Süzel, E. (2023). Responsibility of online platforms towards consumers. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 12(6), 226-232.
Boonaramruang, P. (2024). Platform policy & regulation. Faculty of Law, Chulalongkorn University.
Bulgakova, D., & Deruma, S. (2023). The liability of online intermediaries under European Union Law. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, 8(9), 1-43. https://kmlpj.ukma.edu.ua/article/view/303154/295197
Dillaway, M. E. (2021). The new “web-stream” of commerce: Amazon and the necessity of strict products liability for online marketplaces. Vanderbilt Law Review, 74(1), 187–220. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol74/iss1/4
Electronic Transactions Development Agency. (2024). Value of e-commerce survey in Thailand. https://www.etda.or.th
Electronic Transactions Development Agency. (2025, July 31). ETDA opens forum to clarify “measures for regulating online marketplace platforms” following the announcement of the list of high-risk platforms requiring additional duties under the DPS Law. https://www.etda.or.th/th/pr-news/Online-Market_DPS.aspx
European Union. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European parliament and of the council of 19 October 2022 on a single market for digital services and amending directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). EUR-Lex Access to European Union Law.
Fairgrieve, D. et al. (2024). Product liability and online marketplaces: Comparison and reform. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 73(2), 477-504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589324000046
Loomis v. Amazon.com LLC, 63 Cal. App. 5th 466, 277 Cal. Rptr. 3d 769 (Ct. App. 2021). Oberdorf v. Amazon.com, Inc., 930 F.3d 136 (3d Cir. 2019).
Sørensen, M. J. (2022). Is the “New Deal” for consumers a big deal? Consumer protection and online marketplaces. European Review of Private Law, 30(6), 1019–1038. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4567942
Veltri, G. A., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Folkvord, F., Theben, A., & Gaskell, G. (2023). The impact of online platform transparency of information on consumers' choices. Behavioural Public Policy, 7(1), 55-82. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.11