New Generation Teachers Resilience: Home Grown Teacher Scholarship Program
Main Article Content
Abstract
This qualitative research investigated the resilience process among the new generation of teachers in the Home-Grown Teacher Scholarship Program ("Kru Rak Thin" project) to understand their motivation to complete the bachelor's degree. The primary informants included the 12 new generation teachers, i.e., the current scholarship students under Batch 1 in the "Kru Rak Thin" project, while the secondary informants were the 10 individuals involved with the social context of the new generation teachers, i.e., lecturers and personnel in the community. According to the research results, most scholarship students' family members worked as agricultural laborers with uncertain incomes. Their living conditions were poor regarding nutrition, secure housing, and a lack of caregivers. Although some students were determined to complete their bachelor's degree, poverty unfortunately limited their dreams. The hardships encountered by these students included the family poverty affecting their further education at a university level and the difficulties in the academic context. The resilience of students' identity was derived from their individual and personal ability to relate the experiences learned from their own families, culture, and beliefs to the social world in which they are currently living. Furthermore, it could be noted that the students would be able to access the education, activities enhancing the curriculum's potential, mutual goals among the lecturers and students, participation of personnel in the community in the activities, and involvement of families in modifying the students' behaviors only when there was the social context contribution from various sectors supporting the student's resilience process e.g. flexible regulations of the Equitable Education Fund (EEF), and so on.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in articles in the Journal of Arts of Management It is the responsibility of the author of the article. and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team I agree that the article is copyright of the Arts and Management Journal.
References
Backonja, U., Hall, A. K., & Thielke, S. (2014). Older adults' current and potential uses of information technologies in a changing world: a theoretical perspective. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 80(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415015591109
Carpenter, S.R., & Gunderson, L. (2001). Coping with Collapse: Ecological and Social Dynamics in Ecosystem Management: Like flight simulators that train would-be aviators, simple models can be used to evoke people's adaptive, forward-thinking behavior, aimed in this instance at sustainability of human–natural systems. BioScience, 51(6), 451-457. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0451:CWCEAS]2.0.CO;2
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
Education Equality Fund. (2023). Local teacher care program, academic year 2023. https://www.eef.or.th/notice_category/teachereef/
Fitts, W. H. (1972). The self-concept and behavior: overview and supplement. Western Psychological Service.
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253-267.
Groberg, E. (1995). A guide to promoting resilience in children: Strengthening the human strengthening the human spirit. Early childhood development: Practice and reflections, v. 8. The Hague-NO: Bemard Van Leer Foundation.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164
Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20149
Chanavorn, P. (2006). The technology of self in ending drug dependence[Doctoral Dissertation, Srinakharinwirot University].
Rutter, M. (2008). Development concepts in developmental psychopathology. In J. J. Hudziak (Ed). Developmental psychopathology and wellness: genetic and environmental influences. American Psychiatric Publishing.
United Nations Thailand. (2024). Sustainable development goal 4: quality education. https://thailand.un.org/th/sdgs/4
Ungar, M. (2008). Resilience across cultures. British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl343
Zwemer, E., Chen, F., Beck Dallaghan, G. L., Shenvi, C., Wilson, L., Martinelli, S. M., Resnick-Kahle, M., Crowner, J., Joyner, B. L., Westervelt, L., Jordan, J. M., Chuang, A., & Shaheen, A. (2022). Reinvigorating an academy of medical educators using ecological systems theory. Cureus, 14(1), e21640. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21640DOI:10.7759/cureus.2164