The Development of Digital Leadership Indicators of School Administrators under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office in the Northeastern Region

Main Article Content

Naraporn Kumhangphol
Jutamas Srijumnong
Suchat Bangwiset

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to: firstly, establish indicators for digital leadership among school administrators in the secondary educational service area office of northeastern Thailand; and secondly, assess how well the structural model of digital leadership aligned with empirical data in the same region. The research was carried out in three phases. Phase one involved constructing and refining digital leadership indicators through the analysis of existing research and documentation, expert interviews, and the creation of a conceptual framework. Phase two focused on evaluating the proposed model by comparing it to empirical data collected from a sample of 660 school administrators using statistical software. Data was gathered through a 5-level rating scale. In the third phase, the study investigated the application of the developed indicators to digital leadership. A quality assessment was performed by five experts using Likert's 5-level rating scale questionnaire to evaluate the implementation of digital leadership indicators. The results of the study can be summarized as follows: The development of digital leadership indicators led to the identification of four main components, 12 sub-components, and 56 indicators for school administrators under the secondary educational service area office. The four main components were digital vision, digital literacy, digital communication, and digital culture. Each component included three sub-components and 14 indicators. The examination of the confirmatory factor analysis model demonstrated consistency with the statistical values: gif.latex?\chi2 = 22.35, DF = 23, GFI =0.99, AGFI =0.98, CFI = 1.00, SRMR =0.00, and RMSEA = 0.00. These results indicated that the model of digital leadership for school administrators aligns well with the empirical data, confirming the hypotheses.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kumhangphol, N., Srijumnong, J., & Bangwiset, S. (2024). The Development of Digital Leadership Indicators of School Administrators under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office in the Northeastern Region . Journal of Arts Management, 8(2), 373–394. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jam/article/view/269502
Section
Research Articles

References

Akçıl, U, Aksal, F.A., Mukhametzyanova. F.S., & Gazi, Z.A. (2017). An examination of open and technology leadership in managerial practices of education system. EURSSIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 119-131.

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00607a

Bass, B.M. (1990). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218-259.

Chaemchoi, S, (2019). Educational institution administration in the digital age. Chulalongkorn University.

Chueawangkham, E., & Ariratana, W. (2021). Digital leadership of schools administrator under the Udonthani primary education area 4. In The 22nd National Graduate Research Conference: NGRC, March 25, (pp.886-893). Khon Kaen University.

Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1993). Management of organizational behavior: utilizing human resources (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Izham, M., Juraime, F., Hamid, A., & Nordin, N. (2014). Technology leadership and its relationship with school-Malaysia standard of education quality (School-MSEQ). International Education Studies, 7(13), 278-285. DOI: 10.5539/ies.v7n13p278

Johnstone, J.N. (1981). Indicators of education system. The Anchor Press.

Kanchanathanachai, C. (2019). Indicators of digital leadership of school administrators Under the Basic Education Commission[Doctoral dissertation, Mahamakut Rajavidyalaya University].

Kanchanavasi, S, (2000). Theory of evolution (6th ed.). Chulalongkorn University.

Koontz, H., & Weihrich, H. (2009). Essentials of management an international perspective (8th ed.). TATA McGraw-Hill.

Mongkolvanich. C (2013). Organization and personnel management in education. Chulalongkorn University.

Mook, K.K. (2009). Digital leadership for high school classroom management. AU Graduate School of Education Journal, 1(1), 146-149.

https://repository.au.edu/handle/6623004553/12699

Pongsrivattana, S. (2007). Leadership status. Expernet.

Sararatana, W, (2013). Leadership: Current contemporary theories and perspectives. Limited Partnership Thipwisut.

Schermerhorn, J.R. (2002). Management. John Wiley & Sons.

Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing Newbury Park. Sage Publications.

Somprat, K, (2019). Leadership: Concepts, Theory and development. Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University.

Sriputtarin, S, (2007). Developing a model for certifying external assessors in educational quality assessment of basic education (Research report). Office for Educational Standards and Quality Assessment. https://www.onesqa.or.th/upload/download/202103231531456.pdf

Sullivan, L. (2017). 8 skills every digital leader needs. https://www.cmswire.com/digital-workplace/8-skills-every-digital-leader-needs/

Tama, L, (2021). Digital era leadership of school administrators affecting educational quality assurance system implementation of schools under the secondary educational service area office 22[Master’s thesis, Nakhon Phanom University].

Teanprapakun, P, (2018). Leadership of school administrators in education 4.0. Department of Educational Administration, Faculty of Education, Lampang Rajabhat University.

Thannimalai, R., & Raman, A. (2018). Principals' technology leadership and teachers' technology integration in the 21st century classroom. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(2), 177-187.

Thawinkarn, D. (2021). Digital leadership (2nd ed.). Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University.

Wangrungkij, P, (2018). Development of indicators and program for enhancing academic engagement for undergraduate students as mediated by personal best goal[Doctoral dissertation, Srinakharinwirot University].