Legal Measures of Geographical Indication to Protect Traditional Knowledge of Food Products in the ASEAN Community: Lessons for Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to collect the data related to the legal measures of geographical indications for the protection of Thai food products and to propose guidelines for amending the geographical indications law related to the protection of traditional knowledge of Thai food. The results showed that Thailand can use flexible legal measures to maximize benefits, including learning from the experiences of member countries of the Southeast Asian Association and India regarding the use of Geographical Indication Law. This knowledge can serve as a guideline for amending the Geographical Indication Protection Act to protect the Thai traditions of using names for geographical sources and the traditions of producing Thai food products.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
References
An Official Publication of Law Society of Singapore. (2014). An Enhanced Regime for the Protection of Geographical Indications in Singapore (pp.30-37). Singapore: The Law Society of Singapore.
Bangun, J.A. (2011). Legal Protection of Geographical Indication in Indonesia. IP Theses IP Community, 14(1), 1-23.
Department of Intellectual Property. (2023). What are the 185 Thai GI Products? https://www.ipthailand.go.th/th/gi-002.html (in Thai)
Department of Intellectual Property. (2023). Announcement of the registration of the geographical Indications.https://www.ipthai land.go.th/images/781/s_52100060.pdf (in Thai)
Giovannucci, D., Josling, T., Kerr, W., Connor, B.O., & Yeung, M.T. (2009). Guide to Geographical Indications Linking Products and their origins. Geneva: CH: International Trade Centre.
Kireeva, Irina and Connor, B.O. (2010). Geographical Indications and the TRIPS Agreement: What Protection is provided to Geographical Indications in WTO Members? The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 13(2), 278-303.
Krittapholwiman. (2002). Documents for consideration of the law of members of parliament, volume 4, on the draft of the Geographical Indication Protection Act B.E. (pp.1-18). Bangkok: The King Prajadhipok's Institute. (In Thai)
Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University. (2015). Chinese in the Ayutthaya period. http://www.atthayastudies.aru.ac.th/content/ view/156/32/ (in Thai)
Silvia, H.B. & Federico, L. (2012). Cultural Heritage. Cultural Rights. Cultural Diversity New Developments in International Law. Dordrecht: CH: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
The Secretariat of The House of Representatives. (2019). Purpose and Interpretation of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E.2560 (2017). Bangkok: The publishing house of The Secretariat of The House of Representatives.
The Stock Exchange of Thailand. (2016). ASEAN moves towards AEC, reveals 10-year development. https://www.facebook.com/set.
or.th/photos/a.177703174974/10150604950314975/?type=3&locale=hi_IN) (in Thai)
United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2010). Adding value to traditional products of regional origin. Vienna: AT: United Nations Industrial Development Organization Investment and Technology Services Branch.
Zainol, Z.A. (2013). Relevancy of Geographical Indications for SMES. Tech Monitor, 3(1), 31-33.
