PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPING LEARNING MANAGEMAENT IN SCIENTIFIC LITERACY OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to: 1) explore problems related to learning management for scientific literacy, 2) develop a program to enhance pre-service teachers' learning management competency for science literacy using reflective practice processes, and 3) monitor the change in their field practice. The participants were divided into three phases: Phase 1 consisted of 111 students from Year 1 to Year 5, Phase 2 involved 36 third-year students, and Phase 3 included 5 fourth-year students after completing the competency development program. The program activities were designed around three key components: understanding learning management competency for scientific literacy, hands-on practice, and continuous reflective activities over a period of 15 weeks. Data were collected using four instruments: (1) an open-ended questionnaire on instructional problems, (2) the competency development program, (3) reflection logs and (4) classroom observation forms. Quantitative data were analyzed using percentage, while qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.
The findings revealed that (1) pre-service teachers initially had misconceptions about scientific literacy, (2) after participation in the program, they demonstrated enhanced learning management competency for scientific literacy, particularly in selecting appropriate situations and providing learners with opportunities for self-directed experiences, and (3) some sub-competencies were not fully achieved. A notable outcome was that prior teaching experience strongly influenced competency development. The study recommends that instructional planning should allocate more than half of the program to self-directed practice. Furthermore, the learning activities should comprehensively integrate all components of scientific literacy and employ strategies that encourage students to engage in continuous reflection and practice for at least one semester.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกเรื่องได้รับการตรวจความถูกต้องทางวิชาการโดยผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิ ทรรศนะและข้อคิดเห็นในบทความ Journal of Global of Perspectives in Humanities and Social Sciences (J-GPHSS) มิใช่เป็นทรรศนะและความคิดของผู้จัดทำจึงมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของบัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์ กองบรรณาธิการไม่สงวนสิทธิ์การคัดลอก แต่ให้อ้างอิงแหล่งที่มา
References
Anderson, A. E., Justement, L. B. & Bruns, H. A. (2020). Using real-world examples of the COVID-19 pandemic to increase student confidence in their scientific literacy skills. Biochemistry Molecular and Biology Education. 48(6), 678-684.
Anılan, B., Atalay, N. & Kılıç, Z. (2018). Teacher Candidates’ Levels of Relating the Scientific Knowledge to Their Daily Lives. International Journal of Instruction. 11(4), 733-748.
Aseeri, M. M. Y. (2015). The Reality of Professional Development of Mathematics and Science Teachers at Elementary Schools in Najran, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Education and Practice. 6(23), 85-99.
Dawan, P. & Kijkuakul, S. (2022). Science Teacher’s View on Promoting Scientific Literacy through Online Teaching. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University. 45(2). 17-33.
Boujaoude, S. B. (2002). Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: The case of Lebanon. International Journal of Science Education. 24(2), 139-156.
Gao, S., Hall, J. L., Zygouris-Coe, V. & Grysko, R. A. (2021). Understanding the Role of Science-Specific Literacy Strategies in Supporting Science Teaching and Student Learning: A Case Study of Preservice Elementary Teachers in a Science Methods Course that Integrated a Disciplinary Literacy Framework. Electronic journal for research in science & mathematics education. 26(1), 33-55.
Ganesan, S. (2020). The Role of Teachers in Reflective Teaching in the Classroom. International Journal of Education. 8(3), 30-33.
Gianina-Estera PETRE. (2022). Teaching practicum: an interplay between ideal and real in pre-service teacher's training. Acta Didactica Napocensia. 15(2), 199-208.
Gibbs, G. (1998). Learning by Doing: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Methods. Oxford Brooks University, Oxford.
Koh, K. H. (2011). Improving Teachers' Assessment Literacy through Professional Development. Teaching Education. 22(3), 255-276.
OECD [Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development]. (2018). The Future of education and skills: Education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.201 8).pdf
Pottinger, E., Dyer, R. & Akard, J. (2019). Reflective Practice through Mentorship: A Program Reflection. Journal of Instructional Research. 8(2), 62-69.
Ross, K., Hooten, M. A. & Cohen, G. (2013). Promoting Science Literacy through an Interdisciplinary Approach. Interdisciplinary Science Literacy. 39(1), 21-26.
Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., Pursitasari, I. D. & Permana, I. (2022, October 28). Professional development model for science teachers based on scientific literacy. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. (pp. 1-7). Bogor, Indonesia: The Indonesian Operations Research Association (IORA) - International Conference on Operations Research 2016.
Sevil, K., Nagihan, Y. & Bahar, A. S. (2022). Facilitating 7th Grade Students’ Food Literacy through Science Activities: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Science Learning. 5(1), 55-68.
Shih-Yeh, C. & Shiang-Yao, L. (2018). Reinforcement of Scientific Literacy through Effective Argumentation on an Energy-related Environmental Issue. European Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 14(12), 16-25.
Sutiani, A., Situmorang, M. & Silalahi, A. (2021). Implementation of an Inquiry Learning Model with Science Literacy to Improve Student Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction. 14(2), 117-138.
Tüysüz, M., Tüzün, U. N. & Çavuş, H. (2023). Designing Authentic Science Assessment for Pre-Service Science Teachers. Dinamika ILMU. 23(2), 261-276.
Yıldırım, A. (2023). How Can Pre-Service Science Teachers Reflect Their Critical Thinking in Their Writings? International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies. 11(1), 76–83.