DEVELOPMENT OF A CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP MODEL OF SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS AFFECTING SOCIAL OUTCOMES IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Main Article Content

Chesinee Sawangsook
Pornsawad Sirasatanan
Theerungkoon Warabamrungkul
Sawatchai Sripanomtanakorn

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to: 1) develop a causal relationship model of school effectiveness in social outcomes of secondary schools, 2) examine the congruence between the development of the causal relationship model of school effectiveness and the empirical data, and 3) study the direct, indirect and total influential factors of the causal relationship model of school effectiveness on social outcomes in secondary schools. This was mixed methods research which was divided into 2 phases: Phase 1: establishing the research conceptual framework by analyzing relevant documents and research, and interviewing 54 school administrators, teachers and students from small, medium and large secondary schools, and Phase 2: testing the research hypothesis by collecting data using questionnaires with an overall reliability value of 0.98. The sample group consisted of 502 administrators and teachers from 108 secondary schools under Secondary Educational Service Area Office in the academic year 2022 and was selected by multi-stage random sampling. Data were analyzed by calculating frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, first order confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation model analysis.


The results of this research showed that: 1) the causal relationship model of school effectiveness in social outcomes of secondary schools consisted of 5 factors, which were: positive leadership of administrators, instructional leadership of teachers, school quality culture of the schools , learning management processes, and school effectiveness in social outcomes; 2) the causal relationship model of school effectiveness in social outcomes of secondary schools that was developed was consistent with the empirical data with the following statistical values: χ2= 17.72, P-value = 0.911, DF= 27, χ2/DF = 0.656, GFI = 0.995, AGFI = 0.980, RMR = 0.014, SRMR = 0.014, RMSEA = 0.000, CFI = 1.00, and CN = 1329.14. When considering the prediction coefficient (R2) of the 5 factors, it was found that they could together explain 90 percent of the variance of school effectiveness in social outcomes of secondary schools; and 3) factors with direct influence on school effectiveness in social outcomes of secondary schools, in descending order, were learning management processes and instructional leadership of teachers. Factors with indirect influence were: positive leadership of administrators had indirect influence through learning management processes; instructional leadership of teachers had indirect influence through school quality culture and learning management processes; and school quality culture had indirect influence through learning management processes. Total influences, in descending order, were learning management processes, instructional leadership of teachers, positive leadership of administrators, and school quality culture.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Checkley. K. (2000). The Contemporary Principal: New Skills for a new age. Education Update, 4.

Coleman, J. S. & Hoffer. (1987) . Social capital in the creation of human capital. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.

Daft, R. L. (2003). Management. 6th ed. New York: Thomson.

Dijkstra, A. B. (2012). Sociale opbrengsten van onderwijs. Amsterdam University Press.

Dijkstra, A. B. (2014). Social benefits of education. Amsterdam University Press.

Dijkstra, A. B., Khayati & Vosse. (2012). The assessment of social outcome and school Improvement through school inspections. Amsterdam Press.

Durlak, J. A. (2007). Effects of positive youth development programs on school, family and community systems. American Journal Community Psychologist. 39(3-4), 269-86.

Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: McGraw- Hill.

Khotbanthao, S. (2017). kānbō̜rihān kānsưksā lakkān læ thritsadī [Educational administration Principles and theories]. Bamgkok: Panyachon.

Phahamak, W. (2016). khwām sam phan chœ̄ng sāhēt khō̜ng prasitthiphon rōngrīan khō̜nāt lek Sang kat Samnakngān khanakam kān kān sưksānaphư̄nthān [Causal relationship of effectiveness of small schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission]. Doctoral dissertation. Suratthani Rajabhat University.

Phonrungrot, C. (2014). watthanatham khunnaphāp: sāng khon sāng chāt [Quality culture: Builds people, builds the nation]. Bangkok: Office of Educational Quality Standards Accreditation.

Puriso, W. (2015). kānphatthanā phāwa phū nam khrū nai rōngrīan nam tok hūai sūan phlū : kānwičhai patibatkān bǣp mī sō̜ won rūam phư̄nthān [Teacher leadership development in Huai Suan Phlu Waterfall School: ResearchBasic cooperative operations]. Doctoral dissertation. Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University.

Sanrattana. W. (2012). nǣokhit thritsadī læ praden phư̄a bō̜rihān thāngkān sưksā. [Concepts, theories and issues for educational administration]. Bangkok: Thippayawisut.

Schall, E, Ospina, S., Godsoe, B. & Dodge, J. (2004). Appreciative narratives as leadership research: Matching method to lens. In D.L. Cooperider and M. Avital (Eds.), Advances in appreciative inquiry: Constructive discourse and human organization. Oxford: Elsevier Science, Ltd.

Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A Beginer’s Guild to Structural Equation Modeling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Associates.

Senge, P. M. (1996). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Century Press.

Sinlarat, P. (2006). kānsưksā chœ̄ng sāngsan læ phalit phāp [Creative education and productivity]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Voogt, J. & Roblin, N. P. (2010). 21st century skills. Discussienota. Zoetermeer: The Netherlands: Kennisnet.

Whitney, D. K. & Trosten-Bloom, A. (2016). Appreciative Leadership:Responding Relationally to the Questions of Our Time. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316605881.

Wo̜rawan Na yutya, K. (2007). Ekkasān prakō̜p kān banyāi phisēt phithī pœ̄t kān prom khrū phū sō̜n sangkhommasưksā [Documents for the special opening ceremony lecture Training for social studies teachers]. Bangkok: Maenam Hotel.

Worawatthanachai, P. (2017). thritsadī kān kœ̄t khwāmkhit sāngsan chœ̄ng čhit wikhro [Psychoanalytic Theory of Creativity]. Substance education. 11(1), 69-78.