THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETENCY-BASED INSTRUCTION MODEL IN ENHANCING INNOVATION RESEARCH COMPETENCY FOR STUDENT TEACHERS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research were as follows: 1) To develop a competency-based learning management model that enhance the innovative research competencies of student teachers. And 2) To study the effects of the competency-based learning management model on enhancing the innovative research competencies of student teachers. The research was designed and developed with a sample group of third-year student teachers who studied in the second semester of the academic year 2565, totaling 56 individuals. This group consisted of 27 students as the experimental group and 29 students as the control group, selected through random sampling. Data collection tools included competency assessment forms for innovative research, innovative research competency tests, and satisfaction questionnaires regarding the model. Data analyses were conducted using means, standard deviations, and t-tests.
The research findings were as follows: 1) The research identified that the learning management framework developed consisted of the following components: background and significance, objectives, content structure, principles, key characteristics, learning management steps, media/learning resources, assessment, and learning management processes according to the AM-3ST model, which had 6 steps, namely: (1) Affective Attributes (2) Motivation Building (3) Set my Goals (4) Scaffolding (5) Systematic Implementation (6) Team Meeting, and Reflection. 2) The study of the model's impact revealed that the student teacher groups in the experimental group, who had received learning management based on the "AM-3ST" competency-based model, demonstrated higher research competence after the experiment compared to before the experiment and higher than the control group, with statistically significant differences at the .01 level. Additionally, the student teacher group expressed a high level of satisfaction with the model overall ( = 4.36, SD = 0.70)
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกเรื่องได้รับการตรวจความถูกต้องทางวิชาการโดยผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิ ทรรศนะและข้อคิดเห็นในบทความวารสารบัณฑิตศึกษา มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์ มิใช่เป็นทรรศนะและความคิดของผู้จัดทำจึงมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของบัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์ กองบรรณาธิการไม่สงวนสิทธิ์การคัดลอก แต่ให้อ้างอิงแหล่งที่มา
References
Chaowprapa, C. (2015). kānsamrūat panhā kāntham wičhai nai chan rīan khō̜ng naksưksā fưk prasopkān wichāchīp khrū Khana Kharusāt mahāwitthayālai rātchaphat ʻUbon Rātchathānī [A Survey of Problems in Doing Classroom Research of the Teacher Professional Training Students of the Faculty of Education, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University]. Journal of Graduate School Pitchayatat. 10(2), 1-9.
Choweneenard, P. (2017). kānphatthanā samatthana kānčhatkān rīanrū læ wičhai phư̄a phatthanā phū rīan dūai withīkān chīnæ samrap naksưksā fưk prasopkān wichāchīp khrū [Developing competencies in learning management and research for student development by means of guidance for students practicing teaching professional experience] The 4th RMU Graduate Research Conference. (pp.634-643). Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University.
Independent Committee Education Reform. (2019). rāingān phantha kit dān kanpatirū kānsưksā phān laksūt læ kān rīan kānsō̜n thān samatthana [A Commission Report on Education Reform through Competency-Based Curriculum & Instruction]. Unpublished manuscript
Jaipal, K. & Figg, C. (2011). Collaborative action research approaches promoting professional development for elementary school teachers. Educational action research. 19(1), 59-72.
Jannamsai, W. & Pornthadawit, N. (2014). patčhai thī samphan kap samatthana kānwičhai nai chan rīan khō̜ng khrū sangkat samnakngān khēt phư̄nthī kānsưksā matthayommasưksā khēt 30 [Factors related to classroom research competency of teacher's at the secondary education service area office 30]. Journal of Technical Education Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. 2(2), 1-11.
Kammanee, T. (2012). sāt kānsō̜n ʻongkhwāmrū phư̄a kānčhatkān krabūankān rīanrū thī mī prasitthiphāp (Phim khrang thī hok) [Teaching science: Knowledge for effective management of the learning process]. 6th ed. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Lorenzen, M. (2001). The land of confusion? High school students and their use of the World Wide Web for research. Research strategies. 18(2), 151-163.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series: ERIC.
O'Sullivan, E. (2005). Comparative children's literature: Routledge.
Panhun, S. (2016). kānpramœ̄n phư̄a phatthanākān rīanrū khō̜ng phū rīan [Assessment for improving students ‘learning] Journal of Educational. 27(2), 13-29.
Petty, G. (2004), Teaching Today Practical approach. 3rd Ed., London: Nelson Thornes.
Phuhongthong, C. (2017). kānwičhai patibatkān chœ̄ng wiphāk bǣp mī sō̜ won rūam phư̄a phatthanā patibatkān čhatkān rīanrū thī nēn phū rīan pen samkhan khō̜ng nisit fưk prasopkān wichāchīp khrū phān withīkān rīanrū sū kān plīanplǣng [Critical Participant Action Research for Developing Learner - Centered Instruction Practices in Pre-Service Student Teacher Through Transformative Learning]. Doctoral dissertation. Srinakharinwirot University.
Phusrion, S. (2020) kānwičhai læ phatthanā thāngkān sưksā [Research and Development in Education]. Mahasarakham: Takasila Printing House.
Poonputta, A. (2017). rūpbǣp kānhai khō̜mūn yō̜ ʻon klap phư̄a songsœ̄m samatthana kānwičhai nai chan rīan khō̜ng naksưksā fưk prasopkān wichāchīp khrū mahāwitthayālai rātchaphat Mahā Sārakhām [A Model of Informative Feedback on Improving Classroom Research Competencies of Internship Students in Teaching Profession, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University]. Social Sciences Research and Academic Journal. 13(37), 61-74.
Rungsuwan, C. (2010) Active Learning. Academics News, Faculty of Pharmacy Chiang mai University.
Seehanat, J. & Papanai, R. (2017). kānphatthanā khwāmsāmāt thāngkān khīan chœ̄ng sāngsan khō̜ng nakrīan ra dap chan prathom sưksā pī thī hok dūai kān sœ̄m sakkayaphāp kān rīan phasān theknik kānchai kham thām bǣp kra tun hai khit læ phǣnphang khwāmkhit [The Development of Creative Writing Ability for Primary 6 Students by Scaffolding with Motivate Thinking Question and Mind Mapping Methods]. Academic Journal of Curriculum and Instruction Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University. 9(25), 157-168.
Shenker, J. I., Goss, S. A. & Bernstein, D. A. (1996). Instruction’ s Resource Manual for Psychology: Implementing Acting Learning in the Classroom. Retrieved from http://s.psych/uiuc,edu/-jskenker/active.html.
Srinon, R., Srinon, U., Niyomdit, W. & Kitnopkieat, K. (2018). kānčhatkān rīanrū chœ̄ng ruk nai yuk Thai lǣn 4.0 [Active Learning Management in the Era of Thailand 4.0]. Journal of Educational Administration, Silpakorn University. 9(2). 331-343.
Suwanno, P. & Lambensa, P. (2019). phon kānchai rūpbǣp kān rīan kānsō̜n bǣp hō̜ ʻong rīan klap dān dūai kānrīanrū thī chai kānwičhai pen thān khō̜ng nak sưksā chan pī thī sī mahāwitthayālai rātchaphat Yalā .[Effects of a Flipped-Classroom Model With Research-Based Learning of the Fourth Year Studentsat Yala Rajabhat University]. Journal of Yala Rajabhat University. 14(1), 1-10.
Teachers Council of Thailand. (2022). Announcement of the Teachers Council of Thailand on the accreditation of degrees according to professional standards. Retrieved from https://catalog.ksp.or.th/th/dataset
Teachers and Educational Personnel Council Act. (2003). Royal Gazette. Unpublished manuscript.
Vygotsky, L. S. & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes: Harvard university press.
Wongyai, W. & Phattapon, M. (2014). kān khōt phư̄a kān rūkhit [cognitive coaching]. Bangkok: Jarunsanitwong Printing House.