CONSTRUCTION OF SYSTEMS THINKING ABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE SUBJECT

Main Article Content

Rapeepan Kongtoom
Tassatrin Wannagatesiri
Kulthida Nugultham

Abstract

The purposes of this research are twofold: 1) to create a system thinking ability assessment tool for undergraduate students in the scope of environmental science subject and 2) to evaluate the quality and efficiency of the developed system thinking ability assessment tool. A sample group of 34 general science pre-service teachers from Rajabhat universities in the central, northern, and western regions was selected using the cluster sampling method. The evaluation of the tool’s quality included five personal expert assessment of the index of item-objective congruence (IOC). Difficulty and discrimination indices were calculated using mean and standard deviation statistics. The reliability of the assessment tool was determined using the Kuder-Richardson procedure.


The research results revealed that 1) the assessment tool, comprising two environmental scenarios with 4 multiple-choice questions each, totaling 16 questions related to the eight characteristics of the hierarchical levels of systems thinking and 2) the IOC values ranging from 0.60 to 1.00. The difficulty index ranged from 0.20 to 0.79, and the discrimination index ranged from 0.20 to 0.65. The overall reliability of the assessment tool was 0.60. In the experimental group, the implementation of the system thinking ability assessment tool found that it can classify the level of systems thinking ability. The 57.89 percent of participants demonstrated system thinking abilities in characteristics 1, and 63.16 percent exhibited system thinking abilities in characteristics 2. Those exhibiting abilities beyond these characteristics were less than 50 percent. The experimental group demonstrating characteristics 1 and 2 is categorized as being at a preparatory level in system thinking abilities, with an average percentage of 60.53, whereas the basic to expert levels have an average percentage of less than 50.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Arnold, R. D. & Wade, J. P. (2015). A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach. Procedia Computer Science. 44, 669-678.

Assaraf, O. B.-Z. & Orion, N. (2005). Development of System Thinking Skills in the Context of Earth System Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42(5), 518-560.

Assaraf, O. B.-Z. & Orion, N. (2010). System Thinking Skills at Elementary School. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 47, 540-563.

Bahri, A., Jamaluddin, A., Muharni, A., Fikri, M. & Arifuddin, M. (2021). The Need of Science Learning to Empower High Order Thinking Skills in 21st Century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1899. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012144

Brandstadtera, K., Harmsa, U. & Großschedl, J. (2012). Assessing System Thinking Through Different Concept-Mapping Practices. International Journal of Science Education. 34(14), 2147–2170.

Chen, Y-C., Wilson, K. & Lin, H-S. (2019). Identifying the Challenging Characteristics of Systems Thinking Encountered by Undergraduate Students in Chemistry Problem-Solving of Gas Laws. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 20, 594-605.

Khajeloo, M. & Siegel, M. (2022). Concept Map as a Tool to Assess and Enhance. Students' System Thinking Skills. Instructional Science. 50(1), 571-597.

Lavi, R. & Dori, Y. J. (2018). Systems thinking of Pre- and In-Service Science and Engineering Teachers. International Journal of Science Education. 41(2), 248-279.

Lewis, A. & Smith, D. (1993). Defining Higher Order Thinking. Theory Into Practice. 32(3), 131-137.

Meilinda, Rustaman, N. Y., Firman, H. & Tjasyono, B. (2018). Development and Validation of Climate Change System Thinking Instrument (CCSTI) for Measuring System Thinking on Climate Change Content. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series. 1013(1), 1-8.

Miterianifa, M., Ashadi, A., Saputro, S. & Suciati, S. (2021, November). Higher Order Thinking Skills in the 21st Century: Critical Thinking. In International Conference on Social Science, Humanities, Education and Society Development. Tegal: Indonesia.

Nagarajan, S. & Overton, T. (2019). Promoting Systems Thinking Using Project- and Problem-Based Learning. Journal of Chemical Education. 96(12), 2901-2909.

Ongiem, A. & Vichitvejpaisal, P. (2018). kāntrūatsō̜p khunnaphāp khrư̄angmư̄ wičhai [Validation of the Tests] Thai Journal of Anesthehesiol. 44(1), 36-42.

Richmond, B. (1993). Systems Thinking Critical Thinking Skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review. 9, 113-133.

Richmond, B. (1999). System Dynamics / Systems Thinking: Let ' s Just Get on With It. System Dynamics Review. 10, 135-157.

Semiz, G. K. & Teksöz, G. (2019). Developing the Systems Thinking Skills of Pre- Service Science Teachers through an Outdoor ESD course. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning. 20(4), 337-356.

Tanak, A. (2020). Developing Preservice Science Teachers’ Teaching Practices with an Emphasis on Higher Order Thinking. Science Education International. 31, 237-246.

Tripto, J., Assaraf, O. B.-Z. & Amit, M. (2013). Mapping What They Know: Concept Maps as an Effective Tool for Assessing Students’ Systems Thinking. American Journal of Operations Research. 03(01), 245-258.

Zhang, B. H. & Ahmed, S. A. M. (2020). Systems Thinking—Ludwig Von Bertalanffy, Peter Senge, and Donella Meadows. Science Education in Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer, Cham.

Zoller, U. (2012). Science Education for Global Sustainability: What Is Necessary for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Strategies? Journal of Chemical Education. 89(3), 297-300.