THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ BLACKBOARD WRITING SKILL BY EXPLICIT LEARNING MANAGEMENT

Main Article Content

Suvikrom Maprameat
Sasithep Pitiporntapin
Saharad Yokyong

Abstract

This classroom action research aimed: 1) to study best practices for explicit learning management to develop pre-service science teachers’ blackboard writing skill, and 2) to develop pre-service science teachers’ blackboard writing skill by explicit learning management. The participants selected by purposive selection were 21 masters students in Science Education division. The research instruments included blackboard writing skill tests, students’ reflective journals, semi-structured interview protocols, and teachers’ reflective journals. Qualitative data were analyzed by inductive analysis and quantitative data were analyzed by descriptive statistics; mean, standard deviation, and gain score.


The findings revealed that 1) best practices for explicit learning management to develop pre-service science teachers’ blackboard writing skill were: (1) providing their directed experience about blackboard writing and searching for information led them have less blackboard writing problems; (2) reflecting on practice from their teachers and peers provided them with useful information about blackboard writing skill; and (3) providing enough time for their practicing could improve their blackboard writing skill, and 2) the explicit learning management could develop their blackboard writing skill from intermediated level (gif.latex?\bar{x} = 1.86, SD= 0.68) to good level (gif.latex?\bar{x} = 3.06, SD=0.69).

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Chantavanich, S. (2000). withī wičhai chœ̄ng khunnaphāp [Qualitative Research Methodology]. 9th ed. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.

Faikhamta, C., Charoensuk, C., Srinakharin, D. & Boriboon, P. (2016). kānwičhai patibatkān nai chan rīan witthayāsāt [Science classroom action research]. Bangkok: Institute of Academic Development (IAD).

Kanjanavasee, S. (2009). thritsadī kānpramœ̄n [Classical test theory]. 7th ed. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Publications.

Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. 3rd ed. Gee-long, Victoria: Deakin University.

Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1979). College teaching. In P. L. Peterson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 70-93). Berkeley, Ca.: McCutchan.

Mapraneat, S. (2021). kradāndam sư̄ kānrīanrū thī mai thammadā [A blackboard is extraordinary for learning media]. In Division of Promoting Research and Academic Standing of Kasetsart University Laboratory School, Center for Educational Research and Development (Eds.), Prasopkān sāng sit khrū sāthit kasēt lem sī [Sathit teachers' Experiences for improving students, Volume 4.] (pp. 63-71). Bangkok: Siamprint Co., Ltd.

Michamnan, O., Yahakorn, S., & Lekwilai, S. (2015). phonkānchai rūpbǣp kānsō̜n bǣp ʻek phlisithō̜ thī mī tō̜ khwāmsāmāt nai kān ʻān læ khīan sakot khamkhō̜ ngō̜ nakrīan chan prathomsưksā pī thī nưng rōngrīan sap yai witthayākhom čhangwat Chaiyaphūm [The effects of using the explicit teaching model on reading and spelling abilities of prathom suksa i students at subyai wittayakom school in chaiyaphum province]. Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University. 21(2), 77-87.

Panich, V. (2016). sō̜n yāng mư̄ chan khrū [Teaching at Its Best]. Nakhon Pathom: Amarin Printing & Publishing Public Co., Ltd.

Ponpan, S. (2013). phon khō̜ng kānčhatkān rīanrū dūai rūpbǣp kānsō̜n bǣp ʻek phlisithō̜ thī nēn kānchai tūathǣn rư̄ang rabop čhān won tem thī mī tō̜ phon samrit thāngkān rīan læ thaksa kānsư̄sān thāng khanittasāt khō̜ng nakrīan chan matthayommasưksā pī thī nưng [The effect of explicit learning management emphasizing on representation in “integer system” on academic achievement and mathematical communication skill of mathayomsuksa I students]. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University (Humanities, Social Sciences and arts). 6(3), 211-227.

Rosenshine, B. (1987). Explicit teaching and teacher training. Journal of Teacher Education. 38(3), 34-36.

Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. Handbook of research on teaching. 3, 376-391.

Suwannatat, P. (2017). ʻǣp sō̜ng MOOCs khō̜ng Stanford læ MIT [Peep at MOOCs of Stanford and MIT]. Retrieved from https://celt.li.kmutt.ac.th/km/index.php/lurking-moocs-stanford-mit/

Ud-inkaew, C. & Saengpun, J. (2013). kānchai kradāndam bǣp Yīpun phư̄a songsœ̄m kān ʻaphiprāi læ prīapthīap rūam kan nai chan rīan khanittasāt thī sō̜n dūai withīkān bǣp pœ̄t [Using Japanese blackboard writing to enhance whole-class discussion and comparison in Mathematics classroom taught by open approach]. Journal of Research Methodology. 26(1), 91-108.