Main Article Content
The purposes of this study were: 1) to study the present condition of leading the education standard to practice at the policy level, at the follow-up of the promotion level and at the practice level, 2) to study and analyze the foreign contexts relating the ways of leading the national education standard to practice and 3) to synthesize the ways of leading the national education standard to practice. The sample in this study consisted of 284 informants obtained through the use of online data from all educational units, and 49 informants obtained from the interview and focus. The research instrument were issues in the focus group discussion for drafting the ways of leading the national education standard to practice and a questionnaire To collect data for drafting the ways of leading the national education standard to practice (Online). The statistical data were analyzed by percentage and content analysis.
The results of the study were as follows:
- As for the ways of leading the national education standard to practice, it was found that all levels and types of basic educational units had determined and announced and inform the use of education standard through managing the education standard in parallel with the national education standard.
- The results of the study of the educational system of the way of leading the national education standard to practice of 8 foreign countries namely Singapore, Japan, Finland, Canada, Australia, Germany, Portugal and Mexico revealed as follows: 1) Every country set policy and objectives in developing the quality of learners clearly 2) There was the policy that promoted clearly the ways of leading the national education standard to practice in terms of curriculum, teaching and learning and evaluation 3) There was a strong follow-up system and 4) There was high quality of teacher development system, emphasizing teacher development in terms of the quality of techniques, teaching strategies and also high criteria of recruiting teachers.
- The ways of leading the national education standard to practice had into 2 stages as follows: stage 1 the connection and finding suitable and stage 2 reviewing the education standard and managing the work system.
บทความทุกเรื่องได้รับการตรวจความถูกต้องทางวิชาการโดยผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิ ทรรศนะและข้อคิดเห็นในบทความวารสารบัณฑิตศึกษา มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์ มิใช่เป็นทรรศนะและความคิดของผู้จัดทำจึงมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของบัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์ กองบรรณาธิการไม่สงวนสิทธิ์การคัดลอก แต่ให้อ้างอิงแหล่งที่มา
Danelson, C. (1985). The Outcome-Based Curriculum. (Second Edition). Portland: Oregon, see Iserbyt, C.
Khemmani, T. (2014). pluk lōk kānsō̜n hai mī chīwit sūha ʻong rīan hǣng satawat mai [Awaken the world of teaching to live in a new century classroom]. nai ʻAphinyā tan thawī wong ʻēkkasān prakō̜p kān prachum wichākān Apiwat kān rīanrū sū čhut plīan prathēt Thai [In Tantaweewong academic conference documents “Activate learning towards a turning point Thailand”]. 6-8 May 2014, Bangkok Sahamit Printing and Publishing Company Limited.
Ministry of Education. (2018). prakāsok ra sūang sưksāthikān rư̄ang māttrathān kān ʻāchīwasưksā Phō̜.Sō̜. sō̜ngphanhārō̜ihoksipʻet [Notification of the Ministry of Education on Vocational Education Standards 2018].
Spady, W. G. (1988). Organizing for Results: The Basis of Authentic Restructuring and reform. Retrieved March 17, 2013, from http://126.96.36.199/ASCD/pdf/ journals/ed_lead/el_198810_spady.pdf
Thongkao, K. (2008). ʻēkkasān prakō̜p kānsō̜n chut wichā nayōbāi sāthārana læ kānwāngphǣn nūai thī hok rư̄ang kānnam nayōbāi pai patibat [Document for teaching public policy and Planning unit 6 on Policy Implementation]. Nonthaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University.
Viennet, R. and Pont, B. (2017). Education Policy Implementation: A Literature Review and Propose Framework. OECD Education Working Paper No.162.