Main Article Content
Today, the world has entered the digital age. It has the fast communication, bring to the problem of improper digital media using. The purpose of this study aims to study the predictive power of psycho - social factors related to good citizenship behavior in digital world on four sides. The samples are consisting 400 high school students under the basic of education commission in Bangkok, selected by two-step random, step 1 is a simple random sampling for the school and step 2 is a random sampling using class is a break to random students. The research consisted of six instruments in the form of summated rating scale. The reliability values ranged from .70 to .85. The data was analyzed by multiple regression analysis: Enter & Stepwise analysis. The findings were as follows: The independent factor involved to rule-making behavior and respect others people behavior in digital world is good attitude to good digital citizenship (β = .32, .45). Moreover, the independent factor involved to participation behavior and responsibility behavior in digital world is openness to experience personality (β = .39, .28). These variables are very important to develop the student’s behavioral. Therefore, educational institutions should promote the policy on student development in the use of digital media. It focuses on organizing learning activities that cultivate and develop good attitude to good digital citizenship and openness to experience personality. To make more good citizenship behavior in digital world.
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, Inc.
Allport, G. (1935). Handbook of Social Psychology. Worcester, Mass: Clark University Press.
Allport, G. (1961). Pattern And Growth In Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.
Engleewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentic-Hall, Inc.
Charoenrut, L. (2012). Analysis of factors affect on intellectual consumption behavior of secondary
education in the secondary education service office area 2 by multiple group analysis.
(Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://ir.swu.ac.th/xmlui/handle/123456789/3805
Charoenwanit, S. (2017). kān rangkǣ kan phān phư̄nthī sai bœ̄ : phonkrathop læ kān pō̜ngkan nai
wairun [Cyber Bullying: Impacts and Preventions in Adolescents]. Thai Science and
Technology Journal, 25(4), 639-648.
Choi, M., Glassman M., & Cristol D. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in the internet age:
Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Computers & Education, 107,
Choochom, O. (2002). wichā wō̜pō̜ hārō̜isō̜ng kānsāng læ phatthanā khrư̄angmư̄ wat thāng
phrưttikam sāt [RB 502 Construction and Development of Measuring Instruments in
Behavioral Science]. Bangkok: Behavioral Science Research institute.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five
Factor Model (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and Facets: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using
the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 64(1), 21-50. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2
Hallaq, T. (2016). Evaluating Online Media Literacy in Higher Education: Validity and Reliability of the
Digital Online Media Literacy Assessment (DOMLA). Media Literacy Education, 8(1), 62-84.
Janpipatpong, T. (2016). Personal and social environmental factors related to intellectual
facebook consumption behavior of undergraduate students in Bangkok metropolis.
(Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://bsris.swu.ac.th/thesis/56199130339RB6992555f.pdf
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and
theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2, 102-138. DOI:10.4236/ojpp.2016.62019
Jones, L. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2016). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. SAGE new
media & society, 18(9), 2063-2079. DOI:10.1177/1461444815577797
Joyrod, P., Kasemnet, L., & Jinnge, P. (2010). patčhai thī mī phon tō̜ phrưttikamkān rap sư̄ ʻintœ̄net
yāng mī wičhāranayān khō̜ng nakrīan chūang chan thī sī nai khēt Krung Thēp Mahā Nakhō̜n
[Factors Affecting Critical Internet-Consumption Behavior of Senior High School Students
in Bangkok]. Warasan Phuettikammasat, 16(1), 1-29.
Klaykaew, K. K. (2014). botbāt khō̜ng khrō̜pkhrūa nai kān plūkfang læ phatthanā khwāmpen
phonlamư̄ang dī tām rabō̜p prachāthipatai hai kap dek læ yaowachon [The Role of
Families in the Fortering and Development of Children becoming Good Citizens in a Democratic Society]. Warasan Phuettikammasat, 20(1), 1-18.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, E. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activity. Education and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. DOI:10.1177/001316447003000308
LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. Action. Social Forces. 13: 230-237. DOI:10.1093/ije/dyp398
Makaramani, R. (2013). phrưttikam khwāmpen phonlamư̄ang khō̜ng yaowachon nai
mahāwitthayālairātchaphat sūansunantha [Citizenship behaviors of youth in Suan
Sunandha Rajabhat University]. Research and Development Journal Suan Sunandha
Rajabhat University, 5, 74-84.
Mapobsuk, V. (2005). čhittawitthayā thūapai [General Psychology]. Bangkok: sūn songsœ̄m
National Statistical Office, Electronic Transactions Development Agency. (2016). Survey of
Information and Communication Technology. Retrieved from https://www.nso.go.th/ sites/2014/DocLib13/.pdf
Netsafe. (2016). From literacy to fluency to citizenship: Digital citizenship in education. Wellington,
Nidapoll. (2017, March 31). Re: Attitudes of Thai children and youth to online bullying behavior
[Web blog massage]. Retrieved from https://nidapoll.nida.ac.th/index.php?op =polls-detail&id=521#
Nordin, M. S., Ahmad, B. T. T., Zubairi, A. M., Ismail, N. A. H., Rahman, A. H. A., Trayek, F. A. A., &
Ibrahim, M. B. (2016). Psychometric Properties of a Digital Citizenship Questionnaire.
International Education Studies, 9(3), 71-80. DOI:10.5539/ies.v9n3p71
O’Connell, M. J., Clayton, A., & Rowe, M. (2017). Reliability and Validity of a Newly Developed
Measure of Citizenship Among Persons with Mental Illnesses. Community Mental Health, 53(3), 367-374. DOI:10.1007/s10597-016-0054-y
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2017). Number of schools by education area. Retrieved
Palmer, T. (2015). Digital Dangers: the impact of technology on the sexual abuse and exploitation
of children and young people. Barnardo’s: Barkingside.
Panthumanawin, D. (2007). pok kotmāi kap phrưttikam chœ̄ng čhariyatham [Laws and moral behavior]. Journal of Social Development, 9(1), 1-29.
Patki, S. M., & Abhyankar, S. C. (2016). Big Five Personality Factors as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Complex Interplay. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(2), 136-146.
Ribble, M. S., Bailey, G. D. & Ross, T. W. (2004). Digital Citizenship Addressing Appropriate
Technology Behavior. ISTE International Society for Technology in Education, 32(1), 6-12.
Richards, R. (2010). Digital Citizenship and Web 2.0 Tools. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and
Teaching, 6(2), 516-522.
Samoh, N., Boonmongkon, P., Ojanen, T. T., Samakmeekarom, R., & Guadamuz, T. E. (2014).
kānraprū khō̜ng yaowachon tō̜ kān rangkǣ kan nai phư̄nthī sai bœ̄ [Youth Perceptions on
Cyberbullying]. Warasan Pruetikamsat Puea Kan Phathana, 6(1), 351-363.
Shon, J., & Hillman, S. (2015). Defining Civic and Citizenship Education or What is The Good Citizen?.
Retrieved from https://manoa.hawaii.edu/hepc/wpcontent/uploads/ The-Good-Citizen-HEPC-May-6th-2015.pdf
Silavanich, P. (2016). Psychological and work environment factors related to the responsible work
behavior of behind-the-scenes entertainment industry employees. (Master’s thesis).
Retrieved from https://bsris.swu.ac.th/thesis/56199130368RB6992555f.pdf
Statista. (2017). Distribution of internet users in Mexico as of Apil 2017, by age. Retrieved from
Tansuwannond, C., Wongpinpech, P., & Leesattrupa, C. (2010). patčhai thī kīeokhō̜ng kap phrưttikam
kān bō̜riphōk sư̄ dūai panyā khō̜ng nakrīan radap ʻudomsưksā nai khēt Krung Thēp Mahā
Nakhō̜n [Factors Related to Intellectual Media Consumption Behavior of Undergraduate
Students in Bangkok]. Warasan Phuettikammasat, 16(1), 122-135.
Viphatphumiprathes, T. (2013). phon khō̜ng kānchai kitkamkān rīanrū dōi chai panyā pen thān nai wichākān sưksā phư̄a sāng phonlamư̄ang thī mī tō̜ khwām tranak nai khwāmpen phonlamư̄ang khō̜ng naksưksā [Effects of Civic Education’s Problem-Based Learning Activities on Citizenship Awareness of University Students]. Journal of Education Prince of Songkla University Pattani Campus, 24(2), 43-57.
Viyaritt, J. (2012). Psychosocial factors and social norm perceived related to responsibility behavior of rental-car drivers in Bangkok. (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://thesis.swu.ac.th/ swuthesis/App_Beh_Sci_Res/Junsuda_V.pdf
Vorchertbanca, N. (2016). Psycho-Social factors involed in working behavior with ethics standard of
the police officers in Mookdaharn province. (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from
World Association of Technology Teachers. (2000). What is a good citizen. Retrieved from